Literature DB >> 27462394

Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound for diagnosis of perianal fistulas: Reliable and objective technique.

Marina Garcés-Albir1, Stephanie Anne García-Botello1, Alejandro Espi1, Vicente Pla-Martí1, Jose Martin-Arevalo1, David Moro-Valdezate1, Joaquin Ortega1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate accuracy of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) as compared to 2D-EAUS and physical examination (PE) in diagnosis of perianal fistulas and correlate with intraoperative findings.
METHODS: A prospective observational consecutive study was performed with patients included over a two years period. All patients were studied and operated on by the Colorectal Unit surgeons. The inclusion criteria were patients over 18, diagnosed with a criptoglandular perianal fistula. The PE, 2D-EAUS and 3D-EAUS was performed preoperatively by the same colorectal surgeon at the outpatient clinic prior to surgery and the fistula anatomy was defined and they were classified in intersphincteric, high or low transsphincteric, suprasphincteric and extrasphincteric. Special attention was paid to the presence of a secondary tract, the location of the internal opening (IO) and the site of external opening. The results of these different examinations were compared to the intraoperative findings. Data regarding location of the IO, primary tract, secondary tract, and the presence of abscesses or cavities was analysed.
RESULTS: Seventy patients with a mean age of 47 years (range 21-77), 51 male were included. Low transsphincteric fistulas were the most frequent type found (33, 47.1%) followed by high transsphincteric (24, 34.3%) and intersphincteric fistulas (13, 18.6%). There are no significant differences between the number of IO diagnosed by the different techniques employed and surgery (P > 0.05) and, there is a good concordance between intraoperative findings and the 2D-EAUS (k = 0.67) and 3D-EAUS (k = 0.75) for the diagnosis of the primary tract. The ROC curves for the diagnosis of transsphincteric fistulas show that both ultrasound techniques are adequate for the diagnosis of low transsphincteric fistulas, 3D-EAUS is superior for the diagnosis of high transsphincteric fistulas and PE is weak for the diagnosis of both types.
CONCLUSION: 3D-EAUS shows a higher accuracy than 2D-EAUS for assessing height of primary tract in transsphincteric fistulas. Both techniques show a good concordance with intraoperative finding for diagnosis of primary tracts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dimensional endoanal ultrasound; High transsphincteric fistula; Intersphinteric fistula; Perianal fistula; Tridimensional endoanal ultrasound

Year:  2016        PMID: 27462394      PMCID: PMC4942752          DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i7.513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg


  18 in total

1.  Ultrasound study of anal fistulas with hydrogen peroxide enhancement.

Authors:  Alberto Navarro-Luna; Ma Isabel García-Domingo; Josep Rius-Macías; Constancio Marco-Molina
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-01-05       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Prospective comparison of hydrogen peroxide-enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging of perianal fistulas.

Authors:  R L West; D D E Zimmerman; S Dwarkasing; S M Hussain; W C J Hop; W R Schouten; E J Kuipers; R J F Felt-Bersma
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Hydrogen peroxide-enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating perianal fistulas: agreement and patient preference.

Authors:  Rachel L West; Soendersing Dwarkasing; Richelle J F Felt-Bersma; W Ruud Schouten; Wim C J Hop; Shahid M Hussain; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.566

4.  Anal endosonography in the evaluation of perianal sepsis and fistula in ano.

Authors:  P J Law; R W Talbot; C I Bartram; J M Northover
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Is routine endoanal ultrasound useful in anal fistulas?

Authors:  I Pascual Migueláñez; D García-Olmo; M C Martínez-Puente; J A Pascual Montero
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  [Evaluation of three-dimensional endoanal endosonography of perianal fistulas and correlation with surgical findings].

Authors:  Marina Garcés Albir; Stephanie García Botello; Pedro Esclápez Valero; Angel Sanahuja Santafé; Alejandro Espí Macías; Blas Flor Lorente; Eduardo García-Granero
Journal:  Cir Esp       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 1.653

7.  Intrarectal ultrasound in the evaluation of perirectal abscesses.

Authors:  P A Cataldo; A Senagore; M A Luchtefeld
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Endoanal ultrasound-guided surgery for anal fistula.

Authors:  C Ratto; E Grillo; A Parello; G Costamagna; G B Doglietto
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Endorectal ultrasound: instrumentation and clinical aspects.

Authors:  U Hildebrandt; G Feifel; H P Schwarz; O Scherr
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Endosonographic imaging of anal sphincter injury: does the size of the tear correlate with the degree of dysfunction?

Authors:  Frank Voyvodic; Nicholas A Rieger; Sarah Skinner; Ann C Schloithe; Gino T Saccone; Michael R Sage; David A Wattchow
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Pelvic floor dysfunctions: how to image patients?

Authors:  Francesca Iacobellis; Alfonso Reginelli; Daniela Berritto; Giuliano Gagliardi; Antonietta Laporta; Antonio Brillantino; Adolfo Renzi; Mariano Scaglione; Gabriele Masselli; Antonio Barile; Luigia Romano; Salvatore Cappabianca; Roberto Grassi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Utility of Endoanal Ultrasonography in Assessment of Primary and Recurrent Anal Fistulas and for Detection of Associated Anal Sphincter Defects.

Authors:  Sameh Hany Emile; Alaa Magdy; Mohamed Youssef; Waleed Thabet; Mahmoud Abdelnaby; Waleed Omar; Wael Khafagy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Endoanal Ultrasound for Anal Fistula: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jin Li; Shao-Na Chen; Yun-Yong Lin; Zhi-Min Zhu; Da-Lin Ye; Fei Chen; Shao-Dong Qiu
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Role of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound in assessing the anal sphincter morphology of female patients with chronic proctalgia.

Authors:  Ya-Hong Xue; Shu-Qing Ding; Yi-Jiang Ding; Li-Qun Pan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Value of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound scan (3D-EAUS) in preoperative assessment of fistula-in-ano.

Authors:  Isuru Sampath Almeida; Umesh Jayarajah; Dakshitha Praneeth Wickramasinghe; Dharmabandhu Nandadeva Samarasekera
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2019-01-29

6.  Sphincter damage during fistulotomy for perianal fistulae and its relationship with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Stephanie García-Botello; Marina Garcés-Albir; Alejandro Espi-Macías; David Moro-Valdezate; Vicente Pla-Martí; Jose Martín-Arevalo; Joaquín Ortega-Serrano
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.445

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.