| Literature DB >> 27462265 |
Ke Sheng1, Weidong Fang2, Yingcheng Zhu3, Guangying Shuai3, Dezhi Zou3, Meilan Su3, Yu Han3, Oumei Cheng3.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: HIGHLIGHTS Eighteen EOPD, 21 LOPD and 37 age-matched normal control subjects participated in the resting state fMRI scans.Age at onset of PD modulates the distribution of cerebral regional homogeneity during resting state.Disproportionate putamen alterations are more prominent in PD patients with a younger age of onset.Entities:
Keywords: early-onset Parkinson's disease; late-onset Parkinson's disease; putamen; regional homogeneity; resting-state functional MRI
Year: 2016 PMID: 27462265 PMCID: PMC4940400 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Demographic and clinical data in EOPD/LOPD patients and normal controls.
| N (female) | 18 (8) | 19 (10) | 0.62♦ | 21 (9) | 18 (10) | 0.50♦ | 0.92♦ |
| Age (Y) | 45.4 ± 6.07 | 45.8 ± 3.55 | 0.39▲ | 63.6 ± 4.84 | 61.7 ± 9.73 | 0.21▲ | <0.001⋆ |
| Disease duration (Y) | 3.04 ± 1.99 | NA | 3.1 ± 1.78 | NA | 0.43▲ | ||
| Disease stage(H&Y) | 2.03 ± 0.78 | NA | 2.0 ± 0.62 | NA | 0.49▲ | ||
| UPDRS | 37.8 ± 9.86 | NA | 39.3 ± 10.62 | NA | 0.3▲ | ||
| UPDRS III | 16.94 ± 5.07 | NA | 18.61 ± 4.51 | NA | 0.29▲ | ||
| MMSE | 27.8 ± 1.56 | 29.2 ± 0.91 | 0.003▲ | 26.5 ± 2.16 | 27.2 ± 2.74 | 0.21▲ | 0.065⋆ |
| HAMD | 6.38 ± 2.06 | 5.47 ± 1.87 | 0.089▲ | 6.52 ± 2.81 | 5.72 ± 2.10 | 0.17▲ | <0.001⋆ |
| Side initially affected, R/L | 11/7 | NA | 10/11 | NA | 0.40● | ||
| L-Dopa dose (mg/d) | 395.8 ± 278.7 | NA | 440.5 ± 187.9 | NA | 0.28▲ | ||
| No. (%) of patients treated with pramipexole | 14 (78) | NA | 16 (76) | NA | 0.91● | ||
| No. (%) of patients treated with piribedil | 9 (50) | NA | 14 (67) | NA | 0.29● |
NC, Normal control; EOPD, Early-onset Parkinson's disease patients; LOPD, Late-onset Parkinson's disease patients.
▲: Two sample t-test.
●: Pearson χ.
⋆: ANOVA analysis with two factors.
♦: Chi-square test.
Figure 1Statistical maps showing the ReHo differences among patients with EOPD or LOPD and normal controls ( Compared with LOPD, EOPD showed significantly deceased ReHo values in the right putamen and increased ReHo values in the left superior frontal gyrus. (B) Compared with younger normal controls, EOPD showed significantly deceased ReHo values in the right putamen and increased in the left inferior temporal gyrus. (C) Compared with older normal controls, LOPD exhibited decreased ReHo values in the right putamen and left insula. Red and blue denote higher and lower ReHo values, respectively, and the color bars indicate the T-value from post-hoc analyses between each pair of groups.
Regions showing ReHo differences among the EOPD, LOPD, and NC groups by .
| Right putamen | 99 | 29 | 14 | 0 | −4.23 |
| Left superior frontal gyrus | 106 | −25 | 65 | 10 | 5.57 |
| Right putamen | 93 | 28 | 7 | −3 | −7.00 |
| Left inferior temporal gyrus | 139 | −44 | 10 | −39 | 5.67 |
| Right putamen | 95 | 24 | 9 | −5 | −5.40 |
| Left insula | 112 | −33 | 21 | −1 | −5.49 |
Figure 2Correlation between the mean fitted ReHo index and the UPDRS score in both EOPD and LOPD patients (. A negative correlation was discovered between the ReHo values of the right putamen (x, y, z = 29, 14, 0) and the total UPDRS scores in LOPD patients (r = –0.67, p < 0.01).