Amy M Sheflin1, Erica C Borresen2, Jay S Kirkwood3, Claudia M Boot4, Alyssa K Whitney1, Shen Lu1, Regina J Brown5, Corey D Broeckling3, Elizabeth P Ryan2, Tiffany L Weir1. 1. Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. 2. Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. 3. Proteomics and Metabolomics Facility, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. 4. Department of Chemistry, Central Instrument Facility, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver and Lone Tree Oncology affiliation of University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Abstract
SCOPE: Heat-stabilized rice bran (SRB) and cooked navy bean powder (NBP) contain a variety of phytochemicals that are fermented by colonic microbiota and may influence intestinal health. Dietary interventions with these foods should be explored for modulating colorectal cancer risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: A randomized-controlled pilot clinical trial investigated the effects of eating SRB (30 g/day) or cooked navy bean powder (35 g/day) on gut microbiota and metabolites (NCT01929122). Twenty-nine overweight/obese volunteers with a prior history of colorectal cancer consumed a study-provided meal and snack daily for 28 days. Volunteers receiving SRB or NBP showed increased gut bacterial diversity and altered gut microbial composition at 28 days compared to baseline. Supplementation with SRB or NBP increased total dietary fiber intake similarly, yet only rice bran intake led to a decreased Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio and increased SCFA (propionate and acetate) in stool after 14 days but not at 28 days. CONCLUSION: These findings support modulation of gut microbiota and fermentation byproducts by SRB and suggest that foods with similar ability to increase dietary fiber intake may not have equal effects on gut microbiota and microbial metabolism.
RCT Entities:
SCOPE: Heat-stabilized rice bran (SRB) and cooked navy bean powder (NBP) contain a variety of phytochemicals that are fermented by colonic microbiota and may influence intestinal health. Dietary interventions with these foods should be explored for modulating colorectal cancer risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: A randomized-controlled pilot clinical trial investigated the effects of eating SRB (30 g/day) or cooked navy bean powder (35 g/day) on gut microbiota and metabolites (NCT01929122). Twenty-nine overweight/obese volunteers with a prior history of colorectal cancer consumed a study-provided meal and snack daily for 28 days. Volunteers receiving SRB or NBP showed increased gut bacterial diversity and altered gut microbial composition at 28 days compared to baseline. Supplementation with SRB or NBP increased total dietary fiber intake similarly, yet only rice bran intake led to a decreased Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio and increased SCFA (propionate and acetate) in stool after 14 days but not at 28 days. CONCLUSION: These findings support modulation of gut microbiota and fermentation byproducts by SRB and suggest that foods with similar ability to increase dietary fiber intake may not have equal effects on gut microbiota and microbial metabolism.
Authors: Peter J Turnbaugh; Ruth E Ley; Michael A Mahowald; Vincent Magrini; Elaine R Mardis; Jeffrey I Gordon Journal: Nature Date: 2006-12-21 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Caleb J Kelly; Leon Zheng; Eric L Campbell; Bejan Saeedi; Carsten C Scholz; Amanda J Bayless; Kelly E Wilson; Louise E Glover; Douglas J Kominsky; Aaron Magnuson; Tiffany L Weir; Stefan F Ehrentraut; Christina Pickel; Kristine A Kuhn; Jordi M Lanis; Vu Nguyen; Cormac T Taylor; Sean P Colgan Journal: Cell Host Microbe Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 21.023
Authors: Keila da S Queiroz-Monici; Giovana E A Costa; Neusely da Silva; Soely M P M Reis; Admar C de Oliveira Journal: Nutrition Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.008
Authors: Kendle M Maslowski; Angelica T Vieira; Aylwin Ng; Jan Kranich; Frederic Sierro; Di Yu; Heidi C Schilter; Michael S Rolph; Fabienne Mackay; David Artis; Ramnik J Xavier; Mauro M Teixeira; Charles R Mackay Journal: Nature Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Julian R Marchesi; Bas E Dutilh; Neil Hall; Wilbert H M Peters; Rian Roelofs; Annemarie Boleij; Harold Tjalsma Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-05-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joseph P Zackular; Nielson T Baxter; Kathryn D Iverson; William D Sadler; Joseph F Petrosino; Grace Y Chen; Patrick D Schloss Journal: MBio Date: 2013-11-05 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Jennifer M Monk; Wenqing Wu; Dion Lepp; K Peter Pauls; Lindsay E Robinson; Krista A Power Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Kristopher D Parker; Akhilendra K Maurya; Hend Ibrahim; Sangeeta Rao; Petronella R Hove; Dileep Kumar; Rama Kant; Bupinder Raina; Rajesh Agarwal; Kristine A Kuhn; Komal Raina; Elizabeth P Ryan Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2021-02-03
Authors: Iman Zarei; Bridget A Baxter; Renee C Oppel; Erica C Borresen; Regina J Brown; Elizabeth P Ryan Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2020-12-24