Literature DB >> 27461175

Endoscopic versus microscopic stapes surgery.

Ozgur Surmelioglu1, Suleyman Ozdemir2, Ozgur Tarkan2, Ulku Tuncer2, Muhammed Dagkiran2, Fikret Cetik2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study to compare the outcomes and complications of endoscopic stapes surgery versus microscopic stapes surgery.
METHODS: This study involved patients who underwent stapedotomy at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University between January 2012 and July 2014. The patients were divided into two groups. Patients in group I were operated with endoscope and patients in group II were operated with microscope. Pure tone audiometry was carried out in all patients preoperatively. Peroperative surgical findings, complications, and duration of surgery were noted and compared between the two groups. Air conduction and bone conduction thresholds were measured at frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000Hz, and the mean (±SD) air-bone gap was noted.
RESULTS: Mean preoperative air-bone gap was 36.9±6.8dB (23.3-50dB) in group I and 35.1±6dB (26.6-50dB) in group II. Mean postoperative air-bone gap was 9.3±7.1dB (0-30dB) in group I and 13.5±9.7dB (1.6-35dB) in group II. The difference in preoperative and postoperative air-bone gap between the two groups was statistically significant (p=0.023). Patients in group I did not complain of postoperative pain but this was felt in four patients in group II. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.045).
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic stapes surgery has many benefits such as good visualization, and easy accessibility to the stapes, oval window niche, and facial nerve. Removal of the scutum and manipulation of the chorda tympani nerve are less frequent with the endoscopic technique.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conductive hearing loss; Endoscope; Otosclerosis; Stapes surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27461175     DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2016.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx        ISSN: 0385-8146            Impact factor:   1.863


  7 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic stapes surgery outcomes and complication rates: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ricardo Bartel; Juan Jose Sanz; Ignacio Clemente; Gabriela Simonetti; Guillem Viscacillas; Laura Palomino; Isabel Asarta; Xavier Lao
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Tympanomeatal flap creation in endoscopic stapedotomy: cautery vs. cold instrumentation.

Authors:  Emine Demir; Metin Çeliker; Gökçe Aydın Balaban; Engin Dursun
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Does endoscopic stapedotomy increase hearing restoration rates comparing to microscopic? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tsetsos Nikolaos; Tsentemeidou Aikaterini; Daskalakis Dimitrios; Blioskas Sarantis; Goudakos John; Tzoi Eleana; Markou Konstantinos
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Endoscopic stapedotomy: safety and audiological results in 150 patients.

Authors:  Luca Bianconi; Luca Gazzini; Elisa Laura; Stefano De Rossi; Alessandro Conti; Daniele Marchioni
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Endoscopic stapedotomy: Merits and demerits.

Authors:  Waleed Moneir; Ahmed Musaad Abd El-Fattah; Eslam Mahmoud; Mohamed Elshaer
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2017-12-13

6.  Comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery.

Authors:  Secaattin Gulsen; Erkan Karatas
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Primary Endoscopic Stapes Surgery: A Comparison of Adipose Tissue and Gelfoam Seal.

Authors:  Pradeep Pradhan; Anindya Nayak; Sidharth Pradhan; Prity Sharma; Chappity Preetam; Pradipta Kumar Parida
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-10-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.