| Literature DB >> 36032842 |
Pradeep Pradhan1, Anindya Nayak1, Sidharth Pradhan1, Prity Sharma1, Chappity Preetam1, Pradipta Kumar Parida1.
Abstract
To compare the efficacy between the commonly used sealing materials, i.e., adipose tissue and the gelfoam in primary endoscopic stapedotomy. Lobular fat and gelfoam have been used in patients who underwent endoscopic stapedotomy between two groups, each containing 29 patients. The hearing outcomes and postoperative complications were compared at the end of 12 weeks between two groups. The ABG of ≤ 10 dB was achieved in 69% of cases in group A and 76% of cases in group B. There was a significant short-term (1 week) improvement in the Dizziness Handicap Inventory score (p = 00) with patients of adipose tissue seal compared to the gelfoam. Although the audiological outcomes were comparable between the two groups, the use of the adipose tissue can be a better alternative than gelfoam to control vertigo in the early postoperative period without causing any significant morbidity to the patient.Entities:
Keywords: Adipose tissue seal; Comparison; Endoscopic stapes surgery; Gelfoam seal
Year: 2020 PMID: 36032842 PMCID: PMC9411381 DOI: 10.1007/s12070-020-02207-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ISSN: 2231-3796
Fig. 1Transcanal incision given (Right ear) from 6 o’clock to 12 o’clock poison
Fig. 2Complete exposure of stapes suprastructure
Fig. 3Fenestra was made over the stapes footplate with 0.8 mm perforator
Fig. 4Teflon piston (0.6 mm diameter, 4.25 mm length) was inserted through the stapedial window, anchored over the long process of incus, and a piece of lobular fat was used to seal the stapedial window after the insertion of the piston
Fig. 5Study design
Demographic data and patients characteristics of the study population (n = 46)
| Lobular fat | Gelfoam | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 26) | (n = 25) | ||
| Number of procedures | 26 | 25 | |
| Age (years) | 35 (range 22–48) | 30 (range 19–45) | |
| Female (%) | 20 (91%) | 21 (91%) | |
| Ear, right (%) | 15 (68%) | 19 (71%) | |
| Canaloplasty | 01 (3.84%) | 2 (7.69%) | 0.35 |
| Chorda tympani nerve injury | 01 (3.84%) | 00 (0.00%) | 0.33 |
| Giddiness (After 6 h) | 8 (30.76%) | 15 (60%) | 0.03 |
| Nystagmus (After 6 h) | 4 (15.38%) | 6 (24%) | 0.40 |
| Giddiness (After 1 week) | 2 (7.69%) | 3 (12%) | 0.19 |
| TM injury | 02 (9%) | 01 (4%) | 0.27 |
| TM perforation | 00 (0%) | 00 (%) | |
| Follow-up (months) | 08 (range 5–17) | 05 (range 3–11) | 0.46 |
| Operative time (minutes) | 42 (range 29–65) | 32 (range 38–70) | 0.40 |
| Hospital stay (days) | 2.38 (range 2–4) | 2.72 (range2-4) | 0.06 |
Pre and postoperative hearing results for lobular fat and gelfoam groups
| Characteristics | Lobular fat (n = 26) | Gelfoam (n = 25) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative ABG | 37.51 ± 7.2 dB | 36.66 ± 8.6 dB | |
| Postoperative ABG | 13.92 ± 6.8 dB | 15.42 ± 7.5 dB | |
| ABC | 23.10 ± 11.64 dB | 22.20 ± 12.24 dB | |
CI; confidence interval, dB; decibel, ABG; air bone gap, ABC; Air bone closure, SEM; standard error mean
Air–bone gap reported in bins of 10 decibels
| ABG (dB HL) | Group A (n = 26) | Group B (n = 25) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–10 dB | 18 (69.23%) | 19 (76.00%) | |
| 11–20 dB | 6 (23.07%) | 4 (16.00%) | |
| 21–30 | 02 (7.69%) | 02 (8.00%) |
dB HL; Decibel hearing loss, ABG; Air bone gap
Mean DHI scores in the follow-up periods
| Characteristics | Lobular fat (n = 26) | Gelfoam (n = 26) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean DHI score (1 week) | 43.92 ± 6.63 | 51.68 ± 11.38 | |
| Mean DHI score (1 month) | 22.38 ± 9.33 | 18.64 ± 6.67 | |
| Mean DHI score (3 months) | 14.80 ± 5.85 | 15.54 ± 6.10 |
DHI; Dizziness Handicap Inventory, CI; confidence interval, SEM; standard error mean
Fig. 6Diagram shows the comparative DHI scores between fat and gelfoam plugging at the end of 1,4 and 12 weeks in the postoperative period