Literature DB >> 27461019

Response to an Online Version of a PRAMS-like Survey in South Dakota.

Teresa Binkley1, Tianna Beare1, Maggie Minett1, Kriston Koepp1, Howard Wey1, Bonny Specker2.   

Abstract

Objectives Increasing response rates for research surveys is challenging, especially in minority populations. A unique minority group in South Dakota is the American Indian (AI) representing about 9 % of the state's population and 15 % of the births. The purpose of this study was to determine race differences among White, AI, and Other Races (OR) in contact, participation, and response rates in the South Dakota Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (SDPRAMS). We determined response rates of an online version and evaluated demographic characteristics associated with online response. Methods The SDPRAMS was sent to 1814 mothers randomly sampled from 2014 birth certificate files. Results The weighted response rate was 71.3 %, and varied significantly among the three races: 79.1 % for White race, 48.6 % for AI race, and 60.6 % for OR (p < 0.01). A higher percent of White mothers responded online than AI and OR (35, 25 and 26 %, respectively; p = 0.001); no difference between AI and OR. Online responders were more likely to be married, educated beyond high school and having annual incomes ≥$25,000 (p ≤ 0.01 for all), but only education (p < 0.001) and income (p = 0.05) remained significant in the logistic models. 26 % of White, 43 % of AI, and 46 % of OR online respondents used a smartphone to respond (p = 0.01). Conclusions Response rates differed among races. An online version of the PRAMS is a viable method of response to offer participants. Response to the online version via smartphone may increase response from minority populations, emphasizing the importance of mobile friendly formats.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Online survey; PRAMS; Race American Indians; Response rates; Smartphone

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27461019     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-016-2118-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  3 in total

1.  How can PRAMS survey response rates be improved among American Indian mothers? Data from 10 states.

Authors:  Shin Y Kim; Myra Tucker; Melissa Danielson; Christopher H Johnson; Pelagie Snesrud; Holly Shulman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-03-19

2.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): current methods and evaluation of 2001 response rates.

Authors:  Holly B Shulman; Brenda Colley Gilbert; Coi Gl Msphbrenda; Amy Lansky
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Women in an infertility survey responded more by mail but preferred a choice: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Melanie Morris; Phil Edwards; Pat Doyle; Noreen Maconochie
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.437

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Women's Perspectives on Factors Influencing Florida Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) Response.

Authors:  Grace Jones; Stefania Alastre; Shanda Vereen; Concha Prieto; Roneé E Wilson; Jennifer Marshall
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2022-07-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.