Literature DB >> 23257153

Women in an infertility survey responded more by mail but preferred a choice: randomized controlled trial.

Melanie Morris1, Phil Edwards, Pat Doyle, Noreen Maconochie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate three modes of questionnaire completion (online, mail, and telephone) and a choice group for a questionnaire survey with a sensitive topic. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: A randomized trial of alternative completion methods (online, paper [mail], telephonic interview, and a choice of the three modes) for a survey about fertility problems embedded within a population-based cross-sectional survey of reproduction among women living in England and Wales.
RESULTS: From an initial cohort of 21,036 women who were sent a screening questionnaire, 4,559 responded. A total of 699 women reported fertility problems, of whom 593 (85%) agreed to participate. A total of 521 (75%) of the 699 women then completed the survey. Compared with the "mail" arm, those allocated to telephonic interview were less likely to agree to participate initially (odds ratio [OR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22, 0.74) but were ultimately more likely to complete the questionnaire (OR, 2.20; 95% CI: 1.01, 4.80). Overall, those allocated to the choice arm were most likely to go through to completion (80% vs. 77% mail, 72% telephone, and 68% online groups). In the choice arm, women showed a clear preference for mail (59% vs. 37% choosing online and 3% telephonic response).
CONCLUSIONS: Online surveys are a viable alternative to mailed questionnaires but were not as popular as mail in this study population. Response can possibly be increased by offering women a choice of response modes.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23257153     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  3 in total

1.  Response to an Online Version of a PRAMS-like Survey in South Dakota.

Authors:  Teresa Binkley; Tianna Beare; Maggie Minett; Kriston Koepp; Howard Wey; Bonny Specker
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-02

2.  Feasibility of an Electronic Survey on iPads with In-Person Data Collectors for Data Collection with Health Care Professionals and Health Care Consumers in General Emergency Departments.

Authors:  Shannon D Scott; Lauren Albrecht; Lisa M Given; Danielle Arseneau; Terry P Klassen
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-06-29

3.  Patient responses to research recruitment and follow-up surveys: findings from a diverse multicultural health care setting in Qatar.

Authors:  Amal Khidir; Humna Asad; Huda Abdelrahim; Maha Elnashar; Amal Killawi; Maya Hammoud; Abdul Latif Al-Khal; Pascale Haddad; Michael D Fetters
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.