| Literature DB >> 27460795 |
Maxine Zylberberg1, Caroline Van Hemert2, John P Dumbacher3, Colleen M Handel2, Tarik Tihan4, Joseph L DeRisi5.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Avian keratin disorder (AKD), characterized by debilitating overgrowth of the avian beak, was first documented in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) in Alaska. Subsequently, similar deformities have appeared in numerous species across continents. Despite the widespread distribution of this emerging pathology, the cause of AKD remains elusive. As a result, it is unknown whether suspected cases of AKD in the afflicted species are causally linked, and the impacts of this pathology at the population and community levels are difficult to evaluate. We applied unbiased, metagenomic next-generation sequencing to search for candidate pathogens in birds affected with AKD. We identified and sequenced the complete coding region of a novel picornavirus, which we are calling poecivirus. Subsequent screening of 19 AKD-affected black-capped chickadees and 9 control individuals for the presence of poecivirus revealed that 19/19 (100%) AKD-affected individuals were positive, while only 2/9 (22%) control individuals were infected with poecivirus. Two northwestern crows (Corvus caurinus) and two red-breasted nuthatches (Sitta canadensis) with AKD-consistent pathology also tested positive for poecivirus. We suggest that poecivirus is a candidate etiological agent of AKD. IMPORTANCE: Avian keratin disorder (AKD) is an increasingly common disease of wild birds. This disease, characterized by beak overgrowth, was first described in the late 1990s and has been spreading rapidly both geographically and in terms of host species affected. AKD decreases host fitness and can be fatal. However, the cause of the disease has remained elusive, and its impact on host populations is poorly understood. We found a novel and divergent picornavirus in 19/19 AKD-affected black-capped chickadees that we examined but in only 2/9 control cases. We also found this virus in 4 individuals of 2 other passerine species that exhibited symptoms consistent with AKD. Our data suggest that this novel picornavirus warrants further investigation as the causative agent of AKD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27460795 PMCID: PMC4958255 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00874-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MBio Impact factor: 7.867
FIG 1 Avian keratin disorder. (A) An unaffected BCCH. (B) BCCH 971 (beak length: 18.7 mm). (C) RBNH 929 (beak length: 29.7 mm). (B and C) Both 971 and 929 exhibit beak overgrowth characteristic of AKD.
Description and treatment of black-capped chickadees, red-breasted nuthatches, and Northwestern crows sampled
| Species and specimen | Yr | AKD status | Poecivirus present | Beak length (mm) | Beak appearance, histopathology | NGS | Sample processing notes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elongated | Crossed | Normal, cellular-level hyperkeratosis | |||||||
| BCCH | |||||||||
| 160 | 2001 | Affected | Yes | 9.3 | X | Yes | Full Sanger sequencing of ORF | ||
| 263 | 2001 | Affected | Yes | 9.3 | X | Yes | |||
| 394 | 2001 | Affected | Yes | 9.4 | X | Yes | Full Sanger sequencing of ORF | ||
| 449 | 2002 | Affected | Yes | 9.5 | X | Yes | Full Sanger sequencing of ORF | ||
| 451 | 2002 | Affected | Yes | 11 | X | Yes | |||
| 478 | 2003 | Affected | Yes | 21.1 | X | X | Yes | ||
| 498 | 2004 | Affected | Yes | 40.3 | X | X | Yes | Full Sanger sequencing of ORF | |
| 600 | 2006 | Affected | Yes | 8.1 | X | Yes | |||
| 738 | 2010 | Affected | Yes | 8 | X | Full Sanger sequencing of ORF | |||
| 953 | 2014 | Affected | Yes | 25.1 | X | X | Stored at 4°C overnight prior to processing for poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | ||
| 954 | 2014 | Affected | Yes | 25.1 | X | Stored at 4°C overnight prior to processing for poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | |||
| 955 | 2014 | Affected | Yes | 23.1 | X | X | Poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | ||
| 956 | 2014 | Affected | Yes | 8.7 | X | Stored at 4°C overnight prior to processing for poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | |||
| 967 | 2015 | Affected | Yes | 19.6 | X | X | Stored at 4°C overnight prior to processing for poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | ||
| 968 | 2015 | Affected | Yes | 9.5 | X | X | Stored at 4°C overnight prior to processing for poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | ||
| 970 | 2015 | Affected | Yes | 8.8 | X | Stored at 4°C overnight prior to processing for poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | |||
| 971 | 2015 | Affected | Yes | 18.7 | X | X | Stored at 4°C overnight prior to processing for poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | ||
| 972 | 2015 | Affected | Yes | 15.7 | X | X | Poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | ||
| 973 | 2015 | Affected | Yes | 9.0 | X | X | Poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | ||
| 183 | 1995 | Unaffected | No | 7.3 | Poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | ||||
| 389 | 2001 | Unaffected | No | 7 | Poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | ||||
| 392 | 2001 | Unaffected | No | 7.3 | Poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | ||||
| 401 | 2001 | Unaffected | No | 7.3 | Poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | ||||
| 460 | 2003 | Unaffected | No | 7.3 | Poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | ||||
| 473 | 2003 | Unaffected | No | 7.3 | Poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | ||||
| 596 | 2007 | Unaffected | Yes | 7 | Full Sanger sequencing of ORF | ||||
| 601 | 2008 | Unaffected | Yes | 7.4 | Full Sanger sequencing of ORF | ||||
| 739 | 2010 | Unaffected | No | 7.3 | Poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | ||||
| RBNH | |||||||||
| 12 | 1999 | Affected | Yes | 12.1 | X | X | Poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | ||
| 929 | 2012 | Affected | Yes | 29.6 | X | X | Poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | ||
| NOCR | |||||||||
| 674 | 2005 | Affected | Yes | 36.3 | X | Poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | |||
| 848 | 2007 | Affected | Yes | 33.1 | X | X | Poecivirus detection using virus-specific primers | ||
BCCH, black-capped chickadees; RBNH, red-breasted nuthatches; NOCR, northwestern crows.
NGS, next-generation sequencing.
FIG 2 Poecivirus genome organization. (Top) Predicted genome organization. P1 (blue) represents viral structural proteins, and P2 (violet) and P3 (orange) represent nonstructural proteins. Predicted N-terminal cleavage sites are shown below the bar, and conserved picornaviral amino acid motifs are shown above it. (Middle) Number of reads from the metagenomic sequencing data set that support each base. (Bottom) Polyprotein homology between poecivirus and its closest relative, duck megrivirus, measured as the pairwise identity of a moving 15-amino-acid window.
FIG 3 Phylogenetic tree of picornaviruses. (Top) Relationship between picornavirus polyproteins. Color indicates host taxa, with poecivirus highlighted in light red. TMEV, Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus. (Bottom) Detail of boxed portion of top tree showing the relationship between poecivirus and its closest relatives; numbers indicate the percentage of bootstrap support for a given branch.
FIG 4 Viral tropism. Relative levels of viral RNA in different tissues from poecivirus-infected BCCH individuals were measured by qRT-PCR. Levels were normalized to levels of avian cellular RNA. Buccal and cloacal swabs were only tested for BCCH 970 and 971. gi, gastrointestinal.
FIG 5 Histopathology of AKD. (A1 and B1) Gross beak morphology of BCCH 601 (unaffected by AKD) and 498 (AKD affected; beak length is 40.3 mm), respectively. (A2 and B2) Histopathology of the beaks of BCCH 601 (A2) and 498 (B2). The black box (B2) indicates an area of cytoplasmic vacuolization of cells; the nuclei of these cells show contour irregularities and areas surrounded by a rim of clear cytoplasm, creating an “owl eye” appearance.