Literature DB >> 2745884

Range estimation by echolocation in the bat Eptesicus fuscus: trading of phase versus time cues.

D Menne1, I Kaipf, I Wagner, J Ostwald, H U Schnitzler.   

Abstract

Bats of the species Eptesicus fuscus have been trained to discriminate a stationary simulated target from a target with a virtual distance that jitters from sound to sound. Similar to Simmons [Science 207, 1336-1338 (1979)], a jitter-detection threshold below 1 microsecond was found. However, Simmons' decreased performance at a time delay jitter of 30 microseconds could not be replicated, a critical feature used to postulate the idea that bats employ a coherent cross-correlation receiver for ranging. Such a receiver uses all phase information in the signal for delay estimation and therefore will be biased by phase manipulations. To test for such a bias, a phase jitter of +/- 45 degrees and a time jitter in the echo were overlaid. It was not found that there was a combination of both where their effects canceled. Full phase information is thus not used in delay estimation. However, bats were able to detect a pure phase jitter, e.g., polarity inversion of the signal. Bats could also detect phase jitter in the presence of randomized time jitter and vice versa. Phase jitter and time jitter, therefore, are separable features for a bat. The underlying physiological mechanism is not clear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2745884     DOI: 10.1121/1.397758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  The transfer function of a target limits the jitter detection threshold with signals of echolocating FM-bats.

Authors:  Kristian Beedholm
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Discrimination of jittered sonar echoes by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus: the shape of target images in echolocation.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M Ferragamo; C F Moss; S B Stevenson; R A Altes
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Phase sensitivity in bat sonar revisited.

Authors:  Sven Schörnich; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  What the bat's voice tells the bat's brain.

Authors:  Nachum Ulanovsky; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The degradation of distance discrimination in big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) caused by different interference signals.

Authors:  W M Masters; K A Raver
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Echo SPL influences the ranging performance of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  A Denzinger; H U Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 7.  Evidence for perception of fine echo delay and phase by the FM bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Convergence of temporal and spectral information into acoustic images of complex sonar targets perceived by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; C F Moss; M Ferragamo
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Echo delay versus spectral cues for temporal hyperacuity in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M J Ferragamo; M I Sanderson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Probing the natural scene by echolocation in bats.

Authors:  Cynthia F Moss; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.