Literature DB >> 27457832

Biomechanics of Failed Pulmonary Autografts Compared With Normal Pulmonary Roots.

Aart Mookhoek1, Kapil Krishnan2, Sam Chitsaz3, Heide Kuang2, Liang Ge2, Paul H Schoof4, Ad J J C Bogers1, Johanna J M Takkenberg1, Elaine E Tseng5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Progressive dilatation of pulmonary autografts after the Ross operation may reflect inadequate remodeling of the native pulmonary root to adapt to systemic circulation. Understanding the biomechanics of autograft root dilatation may aid designing strategies to prevent dilatation. We have previously characterized normal human pulmonary root material properties; however, the mechanical properties of failed autografts are unknown. In this study, failed autograft roots explanted during reoperation were acquired, and their material properties were determined.
METHODS: Failed pulmonary autograft specimens were obtained from patients undergoing reoperation after the Ross operation. Fresh human native pulmonary roots were obtained from the transplant donor network as controls. Biaxial stretch testing was performed to determine tissue mechanical properties. Tissue stiffness was determined at patient-specific physiologic stresses at pulmonary pressures.
RESULTS: Nonlinear stress-strain response was present in both failed autografts and normal pulmonary roots. Explanted pulmonary autografts were less stiff than were their native pulmonary root counterparts at 8 mm Hg (134 ± 42 vs 175 ± 49 kPa, respectively) (p = 0.086) and 25 mm Hg (369 ± 105 vs 919 ± 353 kPa, respectively) (p = 0.006). Autograft wall stiffness at both 8 and 25 mm Hg was not correlated with age at the Ross procedure (p = 0.898 and p = 0.813, respectively) or with time in the systemic circulation (p = 0.609 and p = 0.702, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Failed pulmonary autografts retained nonlinear response to mechanical loading typical of healthy human arterial tissue. Remodeling increased wall thickness but decreased wall stiffness in failed autografts. Increased compliance may explain progressive autograft root dilatation in autograft failures.
Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27457832     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  9 in total

1.  Pulmonary autograft in aortic position: is everything known?

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Antonio Nenna; Cristiano Spadaccio; Massimo Chello
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2017-01

2.  Size and Stiffness of the Pulmonary Autograft after the Ross Procedure in Children.

Authors:  Yusuke Ando; Yoshie Ochiai; Shigehiko Tokunaga; Manabu Hisahara; Hironori Baba; Chihiro Miyagi; Tomoya Takigawa
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 3.  Narrative review of the contemporary surgical treatment of unicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Maria von Stumm; Tatjana Sequeira-Gross; Johannes Petersen; Shiho Naito; Lisa Müller; Christoph Sinning; Evaldas Girdauskas
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-04

4.  Wall stresses of early remodeled pulmonary autografts.

Authors:  Yue Xuan; Edgardo Alonso; Alexander Emmott; Zhongjie Wang; Shalni Kumar; Francois-Pierre Mongeon; Richard L Leask; Ismail El-Hamamsy; Liang Ge; Elaine E Tseng
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Range of Pulmonary Autograft Responses to Systemic Pressure Immediately After Ross Procedure.

Authors:  Andrew D Wisneski; Zhongjie Wang; Yue Xuan; Julius M Guccione; Liang Ge; Elaine E Tseng
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2019

6.  Biomechanical and morphological stability of acellular scaffolds for tissue-engineered heart valves depends on different storage conditions.

Authors:  Piotr Wilczek; Gach Paulina; Jendryczko Karolina; Marcisz Martyna; Wilczek Grazyna; Major Roman; Mzyk Aldona; Sypien Anna; Samotus Aneta
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 7.  Understanding Pulmonary Autograft Remodeling After the Ross Procedure: Stick to the Facts.

Authors:  Lucas Van Hoof; Peter Verbrugghe; Elizabeth A V Jones; Jay D Humphrey; Stefan Janssens; Nele Famaey; Filip Rega
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-09

Review 8.  The effectiveness and safety of pulmonary autograft as living tissue in Ross procedure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Adelaide Iervolino; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2022-02

Review 9.  Biomechanics of Pulmonary Autograft as Living Tissue: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.