| Literature DB >> 27457808 |
Duan Zhang1,2, Ye-Cun Wu2, Mei Yang2, Xiao Liu2, Cormac Ó Coileáin2,3,4, Mourad Abid3, Mohamed Abid3, Jing-Jing Wang4, Igor Shvets4, Hongjun Xu2,3, Byong Sun Chun5, Huajun Liu6, Han-Chun Wu2.
Abstract
Monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides MX2 (M = Mo, W; X = S) exhibit remarkable electronic and optical properties, making them candidates for application within flexible nano-optoelectronics. The ability to achieve a high optical signal, while quantitatively monitoring strain in real-time is the key requirement for applications in flexible sensing and photonics devices. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) allows us to achieve both simultaneously. However, the SERS depends crucially on the size and shape of the metallic nanoparticles (NPs), which have a large impact on its detection sensitivity. Here, we investigated the SERS of monolayer MX2, with particular attention paid to the effect of the distribution of the metallic NPs. We show that the SERS depends crucially on the distribution of the metallic NPs and also the phonon mode of the MX2. Moreover, strong coupling between MX2 and metallic NPs, through surface plasmon excitation, results in splitting of the and modes and an additional peak becomes apparent. For a WS2-Ag system the intensity of the additional peak increases exponentially with local strain, which opens another interesting window to quantitatively measure the local strain using SERS. Our experimental study may be useful for the application of monolayer MX2 in flexible nano-optoelectronics.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27457808 PMCID: PMC4960528 DOI: 10.1038/srep30320
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1WS2 characterization.
(a) RHEED patterns of a sapphire substrate after annealing with oxygen for 2 hours. (b) RHEED pattern of monolayer WO3 grown on a sapphire substrate. (c) X-ray photoemission spectroscopy compositional analysis of monolayer WO3 grown on a sapphire substrate. X-ray photoemission spectroscopy compositional analysis for the S (d) and W (e) peaks of monolayer WS2 grown on a sapphire substrate. (f) PL spectrum of monolayer WS2 grown on sapphire substrate.
Figure 2SERS of monolayer WS2 at room temperature.
(a) Schematic drawing of the experimental setup for the SERS measurements of WS2. (b) Raman spectra of monolayer WS2 with (Red) and without (Black) 5 nm nominally thick Ag NPs on top. Arrow indicates the splitting of the mode. (c) SEM image of 5 nm nominally thick Ag NPs on monolayer WS2. (d) Simulated electric field cartography at the surface of the area marked in Fig. 2c with an excitation wavelength of 532 nm.
Figure 3SERS of monolayer MoS2 at room temperature.
(a) Raman spectra of monolayer MoS2 with (Red) and without (Black) 5 nm nominally thick Ag NPs on top. Arrows indicate the splitting of the and modes. (b) Optical image of MoS2 with and without Ag NPs on top. (c) 2D distribution of Raman intensity corresponding to the rectangle in Fig. 3b.
Figure 4Thickness dependent SERS of monolayer WS2 and splitting of mode at room temperature.
(a) Raman spectra of monolayer WS2 with different thickness Ag NPs on top. (b) Enhancement factors as a function of the Ag NP thickness. (c) Raman splitting of the mode with different thickness Ag NPs on top of it. (d) IP1/IP0 and IP2/IP0 as a function of the Ag NP thickness induced strain.