Literature DB >> 27457116

Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 score as a predictor of survival in endometrial cancer patients.

Pratibha S Binder1, Jeffrey F Peipert2, D Kallogjeri3, Rebecca A Brooks4, L Stewart Massad5, David G Mutch5, Matthew A Powell5, Premal H Thaker5, Carolyn K McCourt5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of endometrial cancer increases with age and is associated with medical comorbidities such as obesity and diabetes. Although a few cohort studies of <500 patients showed an association between comorbidity and survival in patients with endometrial cancer, the degree of association must be better described. The Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 is a validated comorbidity instrument that provides a score of 0-3 based on the number of and severity of medical comorbidities.
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to explore the association between medical comorbidities and survival of patients with endometrial cancer. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients who were diagnosed with endometrial cancer from 2000-2012 were identified from the prospectively maintained Siteman Cancer Center tumor registry. Patients who underwent primary surgical treatment for endometrioid, serous, and clear cell endometrial carcinoma were included. Patients who primarily were treated with radiation, chemotherapy, or hormone therapy were excluded. Patients with uterine sarcomas or neuroendocrine tumors were excluded. Patients with missing Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 scores were also excluded from analysis. Information that included patient demographics, Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 score, tumor characteristics, adjuvant treatment, and survival data were extracted from the database. The association of Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 and overall and recurrence-free survival was explored in a multivariable Cox regression analysis after being controlled for variables that have been found to be associated significantly with survival in univariable analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 2073 patients with a median age of 61 years (range, 20-94 years) at diagnosis were identified. The Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 score was 0, 1, 2, and 3 in 22%, 38%, 28%, and 12% of patients, respectively. Stage distribution was I (73%), II (5%), III (15%), and IV (7%), and grade distribution was 1 (52%), 2 (23%), and 3 (25%). Most patients had endometrioid histologic condition (87%) followed by serous (11%) and clear cell (3%) endometrial carcinoma. The median overall survival time for the entire cohort was 54 months (95% confidence interval, 3-154 months), and the median recurrence-free survival was 50 months (95% confidence interval, 2-154 months). On univariable analysis, age, race, marital status, stage, grade, histologic condition, and treatment type were associated significantly with overall survival and recurrence-free survival. After adjustment for these covariates, patients with an Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 score of 2 had a 52% higher risk of death (95% confidence interval, 1.16-2.00); patients with an Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 score of 3 had a 2.35-fold increased risk of death (95% confidence interval, 1.73-3.21) compared with patients with an Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 score of 0. Similarly, patients with an Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 score of 2 had a 38% higher risk of recurrence (95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.78); patients with Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 score of 3 had a 2.05-fold increased risk of recurrence (95% confidence interval, 1.53-2.75) compared with patients with an Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 score of 0. We found no interaction between Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 score and age, stage, or treatment type.
CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate the importance of comorbidities in the estimation of the prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer, even after adjustment for age and known tumor-specific prognostic factors such as stage, grade, histologic condition, and adjuvant treatment. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comorbidity; endometrial cancer; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27457116      PMCID: PMC5124522          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  20 in total

1.  Comorbidity and functional status are independent in older cancer patients.

Authors:  M Extermann; J Overcash; G H Lyman; J Parr; L Balducci
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Combined chemotherapy and radiation improves survival for node-positive endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Larissa J Lee; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  The effects of age and comorbidity on treatment and outcomes in women with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Pauline T Truong; Hosam A Kader; Barbara Lacy; Mary Lesperance; Mary V MacNeil; Eric Berthelet; Elissa McMurtrie; Skaria Alexander
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.339

5.  Vaginal brachytherapy versus pelvic external beam radiotherapy for patients with endometrial cancer of high-intermediate risk (PORTEC-2): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised trial.

Authors:  R A Nout; V T H B M Smit; H Putter; I M Jürgenliemk-Schulz; J J Jobsen; L C H W Lutgens; E M van der Steen-Banasik; J W M Mens; A Slot; M C Stenfert Kroese; B N F M van Bunningen; A C Ansink; W L J van Putten; C L Creutzberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Comparison of Scoring Methods for ACE-27: Simpler Is Better.

Authors:  Dorina Kallogjeri; Jay F Piccirillo; Edward L Spitznagel; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  Impact of body mass index on treatment outcomes in endometrial cancer patients receiving doxorubicin and cisplatin: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Susan C Modesitt; Chunqiao Tian; Richard Kryscio; J Tate Thigpen; Marcus E Randall; Holly H Gallion; Gini F Fleming
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Differential prognostic impact of comorbidity.

Authors:  William L Read; Ryan M Tierney; Nathan C Page; Irene Costas; Ramaswamy Govindan; Edward L J Spitznagel; Jay F Piccirillo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  C P Morrow; B N Bundy; R J Kurman; W T Creasman; P Heller; H D Homesley; J E Graham
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry.

Authors:  Jay F Piccirillo; Ryan M Tierney; Irene Costas; Lori Grove; Edward L Spitznagel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Frailty as a prognostic indicator in the radical cystectomy population: a review.

Authors:  Niki Parikh; Pranav Sharma
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  The LEukemia Artificial Intelligence Program (LEAP) in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: A model to improve patient outcomes.

Authors:  Koji Sasaki; Elias J Jabbour; Farhad Ravandi; Marina Konopleva; Gautam Borthakur; William G Wierda; Naval Daver; Koichi Takahashi; Kiran Naqvi; Courtney DiNardo; Guillermo Montalban-Bravo; Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna; Ghayas Issa; Preetesh Jain; Jeffrey Skinner; Mary B Rios; Sherry Pierce; Kelly A Soltysiak; Junya Sato; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Jorge E Cortes
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 13.265

3.  Patients with endometrial cancer continue to lack understanding of their risks for cancer.

Authors:  Subhjit Sekhon; L Stewart Massad; Andrea R Hagemann; Rebecca Dick; Andrea Leon; Abigail S Zamorano; Premal H Thaker; Carolyn K McCourt; David G Mutch; Matthew A Powell; Lindsay M Kuroki
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-08-10

4.  Combination of preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio: a superior prognostic factor of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Rong Cong; Fanfei Kong; Jian Ma; Qing Li; Qijun Wu; Xiaoxin Ma
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Palliative Lung Radiotherapy: Higher Dose Leads to Improved Survival?

Authors:  T S Lewis; J A Kennedy; G J Price; T Mee; D K Woolf; N A Bayman; C Chan; J H Coote; C Faivre-Finn; M A Harris; A M Hudson; L S Pemberton; A Salem; H Y Sheikh; H B Mistry; D C P Cobben
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.126

Review 6.  Digital health behaviour change interventions targeting physical activity and diet in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anna L Roberts; Abigail Fisher; Lee Smith; Malgorzata Heinrich; Henry W W Potts
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.442

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.