| Literature DB >> 27457072 |
Yaa Obirikorang1, Christian Obirikorang2, Enoch Odame Anto2,3, Emmanuel Acheampong4, Emmanuella Nsenbah Batu2, Agyemang Duah Stella1, Omerige Constance1, Peter Kojo Brenya2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) appears to be a global epidemic and an increasingly major non-communicable disease threatening both affluent and non-affluent society. The study aimed to determine the knowledge of diabetic complications among diabetes mellitus clients visiting the Diabetic Clinical at Sampa Government Hospital, Ghana.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetic complication; Knowledge; Type 2 diabetics
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27457072 PMCID: PMC4960830 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3311-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
General Characteristic of Type 2 diabetic patients
| Variables | Frequency | % Prevalence |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) Mean ± SD | 55.28 ± 14.71 | |
| Age group | ||
| <19 | 5 | 0.8 % |
| 20–39 | 92 | 14.6 % |
| 40–59 | 295 | 46.9 % |
| 60–79 | 194 | 30.8 % |
| 80–99 | 44 | 6.9 % |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 243 | 38.5 % |
| Female | 387 | 61.5 % |
| Marital status | ||
| Single | 54 | 8.5 % |
| Married | 465 | 73.8 % |
| Widowed | 111 | 17.7 % |
| Economic income | ||
| None | 615 | 97.7 % |
| <500 (low) | 5 | 0.8 % |
| 500–1000 (medium) | 5 | 0.8 % |
| >1000 | 5 | 0.8 % |
| Highest level of education | ||
| None | 495 | 78.5 % |
| Basic | 43 | 6.9 % |
| JHS | 58 | 9.2 % |
| SHS | 24 | 3.8 % |
| Tertiary | 10 | 1.5 % |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Akan | 383 | 60.8 % |
| Mole-Dagbani | 247 | 39.2 % |
| Duration of diabetes (years) | ||
| <5 | 450 | 71.5 % |
| 5–10 | 126 | 20.0 % |
| 11–15 | 39 | 6.2 % |
| 16–20 | 15 | 2.3 % |
| Area of residence | ||
| Rural | 344 | 54.6 % |
| Urban | 286 | 45.4 % |
SD Standard deviation
Response of T2D participants on the complication of diabetes
| Complications | Participants responses | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Don’t Know | |
| Hypertension | 223 (35.4 %) | 15 (2.3 %) | 392 (62.3 %) |
| Heart Disease | 58 (9.2 %) | 44 (6.9 %) | 528 (83.8 %) |
| Hypoactive sexual arousal | 160 (25.4 %) | 58 (9.2 %) | 412 (65.4 %) |
| Arousal disorder | 135 (21.5 %) | 73 (11.5 %) | 422 (66.9 %) |
| Sexual Pain disorder | 0 | 24(3.8 %) | 606 (96.2 %) |
| Retinopathy (Eye disease) | 112(17.7 %) | 106 (16.9 %) | 412 (65.4 %) |
| Nephropathy | 34 (5.4 %) | 146 (23.1 %) | 450 (71.5 %) |
| Diabetic Foot | 325 (51.5 %) | 9 (1.5 %) | 296 (46.9 %) |
| Neuropathy | 184(29.2 %) | 19(3.1 %) | 427 (67.7 %) |
Values are presented as N (%): frequency (percentage)
Fig. 1Overall knowledge score on complications of type 2 diabetes among diabetic patients
Shows the association between age groups, gender, marital status, socioeconomic income, duration of T2D, individual area of residency and degree of understanding of diabetic complication
| Variables | Level of understanding for diabetic complications | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Adequate ( | Inadequate ( | Don’t Know( |
| |
| Age group (years) | |||||
| <19 | 5 | – | – | 5 (100.0 %) | 0.8198 (3.597, 8) |
| 20–39 | 92 | 14(15.8 %) | 34 (36.8 %) | 44(47.4 %) | |
| 40–59 | 295 | 39(13.1 %) | 68(22.9 %) | 188(63.9 %) | |
| 60–79 | 194 | 19(10.0 %) | 58(30.0 %) | 116(60.0 %) | |
| 80–99 | 44 | 10(22.2 %) | 10(22.2 %) | 24(55.6 %) | |
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 243 | 44(18.0 %) | 92(38.0 %) | 107(44.0 %) | 0.0131(8.675, 2) |
| Female | 387 | 39(10.0 %) | 77(20.0 %) | 271(70.0 %) | |
| Marital status | |||||
| Single | 54 | 10(18.2 %) | 29(54.5 %) | 15(27.3 %) | 0.2125 (5.826, 4) |
| Married | 465 | 58(12.5 %) | 112(24.0 %) | 295(63.5 %) | |
| Widowed | 111 | 14(13.0 %) | 29(26.1 %) | 63(56.5 %) | |
| Socioeconomic income | |||||
| None | 615 | 68(11.0 %) | 169(27.6 %) | 378(61.4 %) | 0.0023 (20.41, 6) |
| <500 (low) | 5 | 5(100.0 %) | |||
| 500–1000 (medium) | 5 | 5(100.0 %) | |||
| >1000 (high) | 5 | 5(100.0 %) | |||
| Highest level of education | |||||
| None | 495 | 33(6.6 %) | 114(23.1 %) | 348(70.3 %) | <0.0001 (34.80, 8) |
| Basic | 43 | 9(22.2 %) | 14(33.3 %) | 19(44.4) | |
| JHS | 58 | 19(33.3 %) | 24(41.7 %) | 15(25.0 %) | |
| SHS | 24 | 10(40.0 %) | 14(60.0 %) | ||
| Tertiary | 10 | 10(100.0 %) | |||
| Duration of T2D (years) | |||||
| <5 | 450 | 38 (8.6 %) | 97(21.5 %) | 315(69.9 %) | 0.0076 (17.51, 6) |
| 5–10 | 126 | 24(19.2 %) | 39(30.8 %) | 63(50.0 %) | |
| 10–15 | 39 | 15(37.5 %) | 15(37.5 %) | 9(12.5 %) | |
| 16–20 | 15 | 10(66.7 %) | 5(33.3 %) | ||
| Area of residence | |||||
| Rural | 344 | 29(8.4 %) | 92(26.8 %) | 223(64.8 %) | 0.206 (3.160, 2) |
| Urban | 286 | 53(18.6 %) | 78(27.1 %) | 155(54.2 %) | |
Values are presented as N (%) frequency (percentage), (X2, df) Chi-square, degree of freedom
Multivariable Logistic Regression analysis of level of understanding of diabetic complications
| Regression analysis Level of understanding of diabetic complications | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Adequate ( | Don’t Know( | Adjusted OR (95 % CI) |
| |
| Age group (years) | |||||
| <40 | 97 | 14(15.8 %) | 49(50.5 %) | 1 | |
| 40–59 | 295 | 39(13.1 %) | 188(63.9 %) | 1.36(0.68–2.75) | 0.361 |
| Above 60 | 238 | 29(12.18 %) | 140(58.82). | 1.34 (0.67–2.82) | 0.447 |
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 243 | 44(18.0 %) | 107(44.0 %) | 1.00 | |
| Female | 387 | 39(10.0 %) | 271(70.0 %) | 2.31 (1.56–3.41) | <0.0001 |
| Marital status | |||||
| Single | 54 | 10(18.2 %) | 15(27.3 %) | 1.00 | |
| Married | 465 | 58(12.5 %) | 295(63.5 %) | 3.37 (1.44–7.93) | 0.0060 |
| Widowed | 111 | 14(13.0 %) | 63(56.5 %) | 2.98 (1.10–8.08) | 0.0334 |
| Socioeconomic income | |||||
| No income | 615 | 68(11.0 %) | 378(61.4 %) | 1.00 | |
| Yes income | 15 | 15(100.0 %) | – | 0.06 (0.003–0.98) | <0.0001 |
| Highest level of education | |||||
| None | 495 | 33(6.6 %) | 348(70.3 %) | 1.00 | |
| Basic | 43 | 9(22.2 %) | 19(44.4 %) | 0.18(0.082–0.50) | 0.0009 |
| JHS and above | 92 | 39(42.39 %) | 15(16.30.0 %) | 0.04(0.02–0.08) | <0.0001 |
| Duration of T2D (years) | |||||
| <5 | 450 | 38 (8.6 %) | 315(69.9 %) | 1.00 | |
| 5–9 | 126 | 24(19.2 %) | 63(50.0 %) | 0.31 (0.18–0.57) | 0.0002 |
| ≥10 | 50 | 25(37.5 %) | 9(12.5 %) | 0.04 (0.23–0.62) | <0.0001 |
| Area of residence | |||||
| Rural | 344 | 29(8.4 %) | 223(64.8 %) | 1.00 | |
| Urban | 286 | 53(18.6 %) | 155(54.2 %) | 0.36 (0.22–0.68) | 0.0001 |
Values are presented as N (%) frequency (percentage), OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval variables