| Literature DB >> 27456862 |
Yongfeng Yu1, Zhengping Ding1, Hong Jian1, Lan Shen1, Lei Zhu2, Shun Lu3.
Abstract
The clinical outcomes of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have remained unsatisfactory after complete surgical resection. The objective of this study was to explore the prognostic value of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) activity level in Chinese patients with stage I B lung adenocarcinoma. A sensitive and validated method was employed for determining the activity of MMP9 in human lung adenocarcinoma cells in vitro. Then, the association was examined between the level of MMP9 enzymatic activity and clinical outcomes. A total of 104 cases were stratified according to the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification scheme and activity of MMP9 was analyzed by SensoLyte® assay kit. The results showed that the MMP9 activity was the highest in solid predominant and micropapillary predominant subtypes, intermediate in acinar predominant and papillary predominant subtypes, and the lowest in lepidic predominant subtype. Multivariate analysis revealed that pathological subtype and activity of MMP9 were independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS), respectively (P = 0.005 and 0.029). Significant relationship existed between enzyme activity of MMP9 and prognosis. And the 30 months DFS of high- and low-level MMP9 activity tumors was 44.2% and 84.1% (P < 0.0001), respectively. High-level MMP9 activity is correlated with aggressive tumor behaviors and poor clinical outcomes in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma after complete resection.Entities:
Keywords: Activity; MMP9; histological subtype; lung adenocarcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27456862 PMCID: PMC5055171 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.821
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Med ISSN: 2045-7634 Impact factor: 4.452
Figure 1Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) activity levels in adenocarcinoma cells and their invasive abilities (A) MMP9 activity levels determined with SensoLyte® method; (B) Transwell filter assay validated invasive abilities of adenocarcinoma cells. **Significant P‐values (<0.001).
Figure 2SensoLyte® validation enzyme activity of MMP9 in SPC‐A‐1BM when TIMP2 inhibited. **Significant P‐values (<0.001).
Patient characteristics
| Characteristic | No. (%) | 30 months DFS Rate, % |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 0.066 | ||
| ≤65 | 52 (50) | 55.47 | |
| >65 | 52 (50) | 73.08 | |
| Gender | 0.397 | ||
| Female | 48 (46.2) | 68.75 | |
| Male | 56 (53.8) | 60.42 | |
| Smoking history | 0.063 | ||
| Ever | 49 (47.1) | 54.66 | |
| Never | 55 (52.9) | 72.73 | |
| Size Grade | 0.052 | ||
| >3.0, ≤4.0 cm | 74 (71.2) | 71.60 | |
| >4.0, ≤5.0 cm | 30 (28.8) | 52.50 | |
| Acinar predominant | 0.133 | ||
| Yes | 22 (21.2) | 77.27 | |
| No | 82 (78.8) | 60.75 | |
| Lepidic predominant |
| ||
| Yes | 20 (19.2) | 84.00 | |
| No | 84 (80.8) | 59.52 | |
| Micropapillary predominant | 0.066 | ||
| Yes | 20 (19.2) | 45.00 | |
| No | 84 (80.8) | 68.81 | |
| Papillary predominant | 0.133 | ||
| Yes | 22 (21.2) | 77.27 | |
| No | 82 (78.8) | 60.75 | |
| Solid predominant |
| ||
| Yes | 20 (19.2) | 35.00 | |
| No | 84 (80.8) | 71.20 | |
| ECOG performance status | 0.822 | ||
| 0 | 91 (87.5) | 64.59 | |
| 1 | 13 (12.5) | 61.54 | |
| Visceral pleural involvement | 0.589 | ||
| Yes | 33 (31.7) | 60.10 | |
| No | 71 (68.3) | 66.20 | |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | 0.960 | ||
| Yes | 25 (24.0) | 64.00 | |
| No | 79 (76.0) | 64.26 | |
| Lymphatic and/or vessel invasion | 0.680 | ||
| Yes | 45 (43.3) | 62.46 | |
| No | 59 (56.7) | 66.67 | |
| MMP9 activity level |
| ||
| Low | 52 (50) | 84.14 | |
| High | 52 (50) | 44.23 | |
| MMP9 expression level | |||
| Low | 49 (47.1) | 65.03 | 0.861 |
| High | 55 (52.9) | 63.64 |
DFS, disease‐free survival.
Significant P‐values (<0.05) are shown in bold type.
For the sake of simplicity, we divided the different subtypes as high and low activity levels with the active MMP9 concentration in their median number.
Multivariate analyses for disease‐free survival
| Variables | HR | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years (≤65 vs. >65) | 0.524 | 0.243–1.129 | 0.099 |
| Gender (female vs. male) | 0.163 | 0.013–2.043 | 0.160 |
| Smoking history (never vs. ever) | 11.760 | 0.937–147.551 | 0.056 |
| Size Grade (>3.0, ≤4.0 cm vs. >4.0, ≤5.0 cm) | 1.771 | 0.858–3.657 | 0.122 |
| Predominant histologic subtypes (MIP and Sol vs. the rest) | 3.119 | 1.415–6.877 |
|
| ECOG performance status (0 vs. 1) | 1.480 | 0.520–4.212 | 0.463 |
| Visceral vascular invasion (yes vs. no) | 1.451 | 0.668–3.152 | 0.347 |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy (yes vs. no) | 0.684 | 0.296–1.582 | 0.375 |
| Lymphatic and/or vessel invasion (yes vs. no) | 1.006 | 0.493–2.055 | 0.986 |
| MMP9 activity level (low vs. high) | 2.858 | 1.112–7.346 |
|
| MMP9 expression level (low vs. high) | 0.911 | 0.507–2.142 | 0.911 |
Invasive adenocarcinomas were divided into five groups: lepidic predominant (Lep), papillary predominant (Pap), acinar predominant (Aci), micropapillary predominant (MIP), and solid predominant (Sol).
Significant P‐values (<0.05) are shown in bold type.
Figure 3(A) SensoLyte® validation enzyme activity level of MMP9 in the patients' tissues from different subtypes; (B) Immunohistochemical staining of MMP9 in five representative cases. Original magnification ×100. IHC scores of these five cases are lepidic, 86; papillary, 163; acinar, 182; micropapillary, 211; solid, 237. IHC, Immunohistochemical.
Figure 4(A) Disease‐free survival (DFS) curve for the patients with stage I B invasive lung adenocarcinoma of five subtypes; (B) overall survival (OS) curve for the stage I B patients of five subtypes; (C) DFS curve for the patients with stage I B lung adenocarcinoma of MMP9 high and low activities; (D) OS curve for the stage I B patients of MMP9 high and low activities.