Literature DB >> 27456168

Four-corner fusion of the wrist: clinical and radiographic outcome of 31 patients.

Andreas F Mavrogenis1, Dimitrios A Flevas2, Konstantinos Raptis3, Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos2, Vasilios G Igoumenou2, Thekla Antoniadou2, Leonidas Dimopoulos2, Dimitrios Antonopoulos3, Sarantis G Spyridonos3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Four-corner fusion is a rational surgical option for the management of degenerative conditions of the wrist. Most related studies have compared four-corner fusion with scaphoid excision or proximal row carpectomy, with a variety of reported results. To enhance the literature, we performed this study to evaluate a series of patients with degenerative conditions of the wrist treated with four-corner fusion using 3 surgical techniques and to discuss the clinical and radiographic outcome of the patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 31 patients (24 men, 7 women; mean age, 43 years; 9 heavy manual laborers) who underwent four-corner fusion of their wrists for degenerative conditions from 2005 to 2015. Internal fixation was done using multiple Kirschner wires (14 patients), headless compressive screws (8 patients), or a circular plate (9 patients). Mean follow-up was 4 years (1-11 years). We evaluated the clinical outcome with the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score and fusion with radiographs.
RESULTS: All patients experienced improvement of their pain, function, range of motion and grip strength (p < 0.05). Twenty-three patients (74 %) reported no pain, and eight patients reported mild, occasional pain. Twenty-one patients (68 %) were able to do usual and specific activities. Mean wrist motion improved to 70 % and mean grip strength improved to 85 % of opposite wrist. Two heavy manual labor patients requested a job modification because of wrist impairment. Radiographs of the wrist showed fusion of all fused joints in 28 (90.3 %) patients and partial fusion in three patients (9.7 %). No patient with partial fusion required a reoperation for symptomatic nonunion until the period of this study. Three patients experienced complications (10 %). Two patients treated with a circular plate experienced complex regional pain syndrome and painful implant impingement; another patient treated with Kirschner wires and headless compression screws experienced radiolunate arthritis from impingement of the lunate screw to the radius.
CONCLUSIONS: Four-corner fusion is a reliable limited wrist fusion technique that provides pain relief, grip strength and satisfactory range of motion in patients with degenerative conditions of the wrist. Partial union is more common with Kirschner wire fixation and complications are more common with circular plate fixation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Four-corner fusion; Midcarpal arthritis; SLAC wrist; SNAC wrist

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27456168     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-016-1824-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  40 in total

1.  Results of four-corner arthrodesis using dorsal circular plate fixation.

Authors:  Corey B Kendall; Timothy R Brown; S John Millon; L Edwin Rudisill; John L Sanders; Stephanie L Tanner
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  Variable angle locking intercarpal fusion system for four-corner arthrodesis: indications and surgical technique.

Authors:  Juan González Del Pino; Douglas Campbell; Thomas Fischer; Fiesky Núñez Vázquez; Jesse B Jupiter; Ladislav Nagy
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2012-08

Review 3.  A critical look at intercarpal arthrodesis: review of the literature.

Authors:  J M Siegel; L K Ruby
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 4.  Scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse arthritis--update on evaluation and treatment.

Authors:  Robert J Strauch
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  The outcome of scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis for advanced carpal collapse at a minimum of ten years.

Authors:  Gregory I Bain; Adam C Watts
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Scapholunate advanced collapse wrist: proximal row carpectomy or limited wrist arthrodesis with scaphoid excision?

Authors:  M M Tomaino; R J Miller; I Cole; R I Burton
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  Degenerative arthritis of the wrist: proximal row carpectomy versus scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis.

Authors:  M S Cohen; S H Kozin
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 8.  Scaphoid nonunion: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Victoria S Pao; James Chang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Motion-preserving procedures in the treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse wrist: proximal row carpectomy versus four-corner arthrodesis.

Authors:  J D Wyrick; P J Stern; T R Kiefhaber
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  Palmar midcarpal instability: the results of treatment with 4-corner arthrodesis.

Authors:  Charles A Goldfarb; Peter J Stern; Thomas R Kiefhaber
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.230

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Learning Curve and Pitfalls of Arthroscopic Four-Corner Arthrodesis.

Authors:  Aleksi Vihanto; Tero Kotkansalo; Markus Pääkkönen
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2019-02-20

2.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparing Proximal Row Carpectomy and Four-Corner Arthrodesis.

Authors:  Minkyoung Yoo; Richard E Nelson; Damian A Illing; Brook I Martin; Andrew R Tyser; Nikolas H Kazmers
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2020-06-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.