| Literature DB >> 27455338 |
Carlo Dossi1, Damiano Monticelli2, Andrea Pozzi3, Sandro Recchia4.
Abstract
Mercury substitution is a big issue in electroanalysis, and the search for a suitable, and less toxic, replacement is still under development. Of all the proposed alternatives, bismuth films appear to be the most viable solution, although they are still suffering some drawbacks, particularly the influence of deposition conditions and linearity at low concentrations. In this paper, the most promising strategies for bismuth film deposition on screen-printed electrodes (surface modifications, polymeric film deposition, insoluble salt precursors) will be evaluated for trace metal analysis. Particular attention will be devoted to bismuth chemistry, aiming to rationalize their electroanalytic performance.Entities:
Keywords: bismuth chemistry; bismuth film electrodes; metal/surface interactions; screen-printed electrodes; surface modifications
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27455338 PMCID: PMC5039657 DOI: 10.3390/bios6030038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosensors (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6374
Figure 1Cyclic voltammetry profiles of bismuth on pretreated screen-printed electrodes.
Comparison of the calibration linear best fit parameters for Cadmium analysis as a function of the chemical pretreatment of the screen printed electrode. Experimental conditions: [Cd2+] additions = 12 μg/L; 60-s stripping; differential pulse voltammetry.
| Pretreatment of the Graphite Working Electrode | Best Fit Using All Calibration Points | Best Fit Using Calibration Using Calibration Points above 12 μg/L | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slope | Intercept | Slope | Intercept | |
| No pretreatment (BiFE) | 1.008 | −4.698 | 0.996 | 0.421 |
| Treatment A (Type-A BiFE) | 3.130 | −5.838 | 2.947 | −0.122 |
| Treatment B (Type-B BiFE) | 5.893 | −7.02 | 5.738 | −0.174 |
Figure 2Non-linear calibration curve of cadmium analysis, and the corresponding ASV curves, at low concentrations (2 μg/L each addition) with a Type-B BiFE.
Comparison of the calibration linear best fit parameters for cadmium and lead analysis as a function of the polymer used for casting. Experimental conditions: [Cd2+] additions = 25 μg/L; [Pb2+] additions = 25 μg/L; 60-s stripping; differential pulse voltammetry.
| Bi-Polymer Film | Cadmium | Lead | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slope | Intercept | LOD | Slope | Intercept | LOD | |
| Bi/Naf | 1.098 | −1.698 | 1.2 | 0.984 | −0.618 | 0.8 |
| Bi-Meth | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0.346 | −1.80 | N/A |
| Bi-PSS | 2.911 | −8.172 | 1.1 | 4.262 | −0.972 | 0.9 |
Figure 3Differential-pulse stripping analysis of cadmium and lead with (A) Bi/PO4/Naf at pH = 4.4 and (B) Bi/PO4/PSS(A) at pH = 2. Calibration curves for Cd and Pb are shown in the insert.
Comparison of the linear calibration best fit parameters for cadmium and lead analysis as a function of the method used for bismuth film preparation. Experimental conditions: pH = 2; [Cd2+] additions = 25 μg/L; [Pb2+] additions = 25 μg/L; 60-s stripping; differential pulse voltammetry.
| Electrode Type | Cadmium | Lead | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slope | Intercept | LOD | Slope | Intercept | LOD | |
| Bi/PO4/Naf | 3.49 | 1.53 | 1.6 | 2.72 | −4.19 | 1.1 |
| Bi/PO4/PSS(A) | 4.44 | −10.47 | 1.2 | 8.46 | −6.29 | 0.8 |
| Bi/PO4/PSS(B) | 4.998 | −9.49 | 1.1 | 12.31 | −10.82 | 0.6 |
| Bi/PO4/PSS(C) | 6.031 | −23.01 | 1.0 | 8.64 | −17.09 | 0.8 |
Figure 4Decreasing intensity of the vanadium signal at −580 mV during the eight cycles in the activation step of Bi/VO4/PSS(B).
Figure 5Comparison of differential-pulse stripping profiles of 50 ug/L Cd and Pb using Bi/PO4/PSS(B) and Bi/VO4/PSS(B) electrodes.
Figure 6Long-term stability of cadmium and lead signals in differential-pulse stripping on a Bi/PO4/PSS(B) electrode.