| Literature DB >> 27455290 |
Miyuki Noguchi1, Atsushi Mizukoshi2, Yukio Yanagisawa3, Akihiro Yamasaki4.
Abstract
We measured temporal changes in concentrations of total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) and individual volatile organic compounds in a newly built daycare center. The temporal changes of the TVOC concentrations were monitored with a photo ionization detector (PID), and indoor air was sampled and analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to determine the concentrations of the constituent VOCs. The measurements were performed just after completion of the building and again 3 months after completion. The TVOC concentration exceeded 1000 µg·m(-3) for all the sampling locations just after completion of building, and decreased almost one tenth after 3 months, to below the guideline values of the TVOC in Japan at 400 µg·m(-3). The concentrations of the target VOCs of which the indoor concentrations are regulated in Japan were below the guideline values for all the cases. The air-exchange rates were determined based on the temporal changes of the TVOC concentrations, and it was found that the countermeasure to increase the air exchange rate successfully decrease the TVOC concentration level in the rooms.Entities:
Keywords: TVOC; VOCs; air exchange rate; guideline value; indoor air of new buildings; target compounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27455290 PMCID: PMC4962277 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13070736
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Guideline indoor air values established by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for the target volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
| Compound | Guideline Concentration (μg·m−3) |
|---|---|
| Acetaldehyde | 48 |
| 240 | |
| Ethyl benzene | 3800 |
| Formaldehyde | 100 |
| Styrene | 220 |
| Tetradecane | 330 |
| Toluene | 260 |
| Xylenes | 870 |
Figure 1Floor plan of the new daycare center. The additional fan was not installed just after completion, and installed at the tatami room and operated at the measurements after 3 months.
Analytical conditions used for the automated thermal desorption-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (ATD-GC/MS) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) systems.
| ATD-GC/MS | ||
|---|---|---|
| ATD | ATD 650 Turbo matrix (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) | |
| Primary desorption | 300 °C (10 min) | |
| Secondary desorption | 5 °C → 40 °C·min−1 → 300 °C (10 min) | |
| GC/MS | HP6890/HP5973N (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) | |
| Column | HP-1 MS: 60.0 m length, 250-μm inner diameter, 1.00 μm film (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) | |
| Carrier gas | He, flow rate: 1 mL·min−1 | |
| Column temperature | 40 °C (4 min) → 7 °C·min−1 → 280 °C (10 min) | |
| Analytical mode | SCAN | |
| Mass range | ||
| Instrument | HP1100 (Agilent) | |
| Column | Ascentis RP-Amide (250 mm length, 4.6 mm inner diameter, 5 μm particles (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) | |
| Mobile phase | H2O:CH3CN = 35:65 | |
| Flow rate | 1.0 mL·min−1 | |
| Injection volume | 20 μL | |
| Column temperature | 35 °C | |
| Detector | Diode array detector 360 nm | |
Volatile organic compound and carbonyl compound concentrations (μg·m−3) in air inside the daycare center just after completion.
| Concentration (μg·m−3) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound | Room A, 1.2 m | Room B, 1.2 m | Room B, 0.3 m | Guideline Value |
| Formaldehyde * | 9.5 | 7.4 | 7.0 | 100 |
| Acetaldehyde * | 33.0 | 23.0 | 21.1 | 48 |
| Acetone | 11.8 | 10.3 | 9.2 | - |
| Propionaldehyde | 8.8 | 5.9 | 6.0 | - |
| Crotonaldehyde | 37.7 | 129.0 | 128.1 | - |
| Benzaldehyde | 10.3 | 8.6 | 6.8 | - |
| Isovaleraldehyde | 22.3 | 13.3 | 11.4 | - |
| 91.4 | 49.3 | 51.5 | - | |
| Hexaldehyde | 104.8 | 63.5 | 57.0 | - |
| 2-Propanol | 7.9 | 6.5 | 7.1 | - |
| 2-Butanone | 161.6 | 155.4 | 159.0 | - |
| Ethyl acetate | 139.6 | 117.0 | 69.5 | - |
| Benzene | 10.3 | 8.2 | 6.2 | - |
| Toluene * | 16.9 | 11.2 | 10.7 | 260 |
| 12.2 | 15.6 | 23.2 | - | |
| Ethylbenzene * | 6.4 | 8.3 | 10.7 | 3800 |
| 4.4 | 5.4 | 7.7 | 870 | |
| Styrene * | 60.0 | 12.2 | 15.9 | 220 |
| 4.0 | 4.9 | 6.6 | 870 | |
| Nonane | 5.6 | 2.5 | 3.1 | - |
| α-Pinene | 124.3 | 54.5 | 79.8 | - |
| 20.9 | 7.9 | 10.7 | - | |
| 16.1 | 4.6 | 10.1 | - | |
| 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene | 6.4 | 7.5 | 8.9 | - |
| Decane | 54.3 | 16.6 | 25.9 | - |
| 154.1 | 49.1 | 50.6 | - | |
| TVOCs (GC/MS) | 2327 | 1218 | 1589 | 400 |
| TVOCs (PID) | 2600 | 1206 | 1668 | |
* Target compound listed in Table 1.
Figure 2TVOC concentrations and compositions in rooms A and B (at 1.2 m and 0.3 m above the floor) just after the building was completed.
Volatile organic compound and carbonyl compound concentrations (μg·m−3) in air inside the daycare center after three months of completion.
| Concentration (μg·m−3) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound | Room A, 1.2 m | Room B, 1.2 m | Room B, 0.3 m | Guideline Value |
| Formaldehyde | 6.30 | 6.01 | 7.06 | 100 |
| Acetaldehyde | 9.48 | 8.75 | 9.74 | 48 |
| Acetone | 15.8 | 15.2 | 12.1 | - |
| Propionaldehyde | <5.0 | <5.0 | <5.0 | - |
| Crotonaldehyde | <5.0 | <5.0 | <5.0 | - |
| Benzaldehyde | <5.0 | <5.0 | <5.0 | - |
| Isovaleraldehyde | <5.0 | <5.0 | <5.0 | - |
| <5.0 | <5.0 | <5.0 | - | |
| Hexaldehyde | 10.0 | 9.58 | 11.3 | - |
| 2-Propanol | 3.66 | 3.15 | 1.28 | - |
| 2-Butanone | - | - | - | - |
| Ethyl acetate | - | - | - | - |
| Benzene | 1.29 | <0.2 | <0.2 | - |
| Toluene | 9.63 | <0.2 | 7.54 | 260 |
| 1.18 | <0.2 | <0.2 | - | |
| Ethylbenzene | 0.687 | <0.2 | <0.2 | 3800 |
| 1.11 | <0.2 | <0.2 | 870 | |
| Styrene | 2.39 | <0.2 | <0.2 | 220 |
| 0.687 | <0.2 | <0.2 | 870 | |
| Nonane | 1.44 | 0.25 | 0.35 | - |
| α-Pinene | 82.4 | 34.1 | 40.1 | - |
| 1.12 | <0.2 | 0.22 | - | |
| 1.09 | 3.87 | 4.56 | - | |
| 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene | 0.934 | 0.311 | 0.470 | - |
| Decane | - | - | - | - |
| 11.3 | 0.876 | 3.17 | - | |
| TVOCs (with GC/MS) | 201 | 48.5 | 82.0 | 400 |
| TVOCs (with PID) | 110 | 170 | 200 | |
Figure 3TVOC concentrations and compositions in rooms A and B (at 1.2 m and 0.3 m above the floor) 3 months after the building was completed.
Figure 4Time changes of the total volatile organic compound (TVOC) concentrations at Room B monitored using a PID after the windows had been closed, at just completion, and after three months.
Air exchange rates and total volatile organic compound (TVOC) emission rates calculated using Equation (1).
| Time of Measurement | Position Measured | Air Change per Hour (ACH), | Emission Rate, |
|---|---|---|---|
| Just after completion | 0.3 m high | 1.5 | 700 |
| 1.2 m high | 1.5 | 584 | |
| After three months of completion | 0.3 m high | 3.5 | 63 |
| 1.2 m high | 3.5 | 126 |
Figure 5Curve fitted, using Equation (1), to the temporally changing TVOC concentrations measured just after completion.
Figure 6Simulation results of the TVOC concentration change with time for the cases of the air exchange rate was same as the one just after completion, but reduced air exchange rates of N = 1.5 h−1 and 0.5 h−1.