| Literature DB >> 27453320 |
Peihua Cao1, Chit-Ming Wong1, Kwok-Hung Chan2, Xiling Wang3, King-Pan Chan1, Joseph Sriyal Malik Peiris4, Leo Lit-Man Poon4, Lin Yang5.
Abstract
Age-specific genetic and antigenic variations of influenza viruses have not been documented in tropical and subtropical regions. We implemented a systematic surveillance program in two tertiary hospitals in Hong Kong Island, to collect 112 A(H1N1)pdm09 and 254 A(H3N2) positive specimens from 2013 to 2014. Of these, 56 and 72 were identified as genetic variants of the WHO recommended vaccine composition strains, respectively. A subset of these genetic variants was selected for hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) tests, but none appeared to be antigenic variants of the vaccine composition strains. We also found that genetic and antigenicity variations were similar across sex and age groups of ≤18 yrs, 18 to 65 yrs, and ≥65 yrs. Our findings suggest that none of the age groups led other age groups in genetic evolution of influenza virus A strains. Future studies from different regions and longer study periods are needed to further investigate the age and sex heterogeneity of influenza viruses.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27453320 PMCID: PMC4958999 DOI: 10.1038/srep30260
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Weekly numbers of collected samples (blue) and those selected for sequencing (red), 2013–2014.
Comparison of demographic characteristics of selected and unselected samples by season.
| Sub-type (Year) | Characteristic | Selected case | Unselected case | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A(H1N1)pdm09 | ||||
| 2013 | Total specimens | 67 (100%) | 172 (100%) | |
| Age (years) | 0.86 | |||
| ≤18 | 36 (49%) | 98 (57%) | ||
| 19–64 | 20 (23%) | 50 (29%) | ||
| ≥65 | 11 (28%) | 24 (14%) | ||
| Male | 35 (52%) | 83 (48%) | 0.68 | |
| 2014 | No. of patients | 45 (100%) | 207 (100%) | |
| Age (years) | 0.14 | |||
| ≤18 | 22 (49%) | 73 (35%) | ||
| 19–64 | 15 (33%) | 71 (34%) | ||
| ≥65 | 8 (18%) | 63 (30%) | ||
| Male | 23 (51%) | 105 (51%) | 0.91 | |
| A(H3N2) | ||||
| 2013 | Total specimens | 116 (100%) | 240 (100%) | |
| Age (years) | 0.001 | |||
| ≤18 | 53 (46%) | 67 (28%) | ||
| 19–64 | 23 (20%) | 45 (19%) | ||
| ≥65 | 40 (34%) | 128 (53%) | ||
| Male | 65 (56%) | 116 (48%) | 0.21 | |
| 2014 | No. of patients | 138 (100%) | 309 (100%) | |
| Age (years) | <0.001 | |||
| ≤18 | 56 (41%) | 65 (21%) | ||
| 19–64 | 28 (20%) | 55 (18%) | ||
| ≥65 | 54 (39%) | 189 (61%) | ||
| Male | 73 (53%) | 154 (50%) | 0.62 | |
*Pearson’s Chi-square tests.
Figure 2Weekly maximum proportion of amino acid mutations for A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2), 2013–2014.
Comparison of haemagglutinin inhibition test results and HA1 amino acid mutations of A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) samples across age and gender, against the reference strains A/California/07/2009 (H1N1) and A/Victoria/361/2011 (H3N2).
| Subtype | No. of samples | Dilution of antiserum in HI tests | Genetic variations (Amino acid mutations) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 160 | 320 | 640 | ≥1280 | |||||
| H1N1 | Age (years) | 0.42 | 0.265 | |||||
| ≤18 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 13 | 9.34 ± 1.79 | |||
| 19–64 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 10.49 ± 3.55 | |||
| ≥65 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 9.63 ± 1.01 | |||
| Male | 0 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 0.304 | 9.50 ± 2.23 | 0.276 | |
| Female | 0 | 3 | 15 | 13 | 10.00 ± 2.62 | |||
| H3N2 | Age (years) | 0.798 | 0.136 | |||||
| ≤18 | 0 | 8 | 14 | 7 | 10.11 ± 2.59 | |||
| 19–64 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 9.79 ± 2.57 | |||
| ≥65 | 0 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 10.66 ± 2.48 | |||
| Male | 0 | 14 | 15 | 12 | 0.294 | 10.13 ± 2.54 | 0.451 | |
| Female | 1 | 6 | 16 | 8 | 10.38 ± 2.59 | |||
*Fisher exact tests.
#One-way ANOVA.
Common amino acid substitutions observed in antigenic sites of HA1 polypeptide of A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) influenza virus isolates, Hong Kong, 2013–2014.
| Subtype | Antigenic site | Original amino acid substitution | New amino acid substitution | Mutated strains |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1N1 | 100 | P | S | 111 (99.11) |
| 114 | D | N | 103 (91.96) | |
| 202 | S | T | 103 (91.96) | |
| 220 | S | T | 112 (100) | |
| 240 | R | Q | 111 (99.11) | |
| 338 | I | V | 110 (98.21) | |
| H3N2 | 9 | H | Y | 250 (98.43) |
| 49 | Q | R | 249 (98.03) | |
| 161 | N | S | 247 (97.24) | |
| 172 | Q | H | 248 (97.64) | |
| 202 | V | G | 253 (99.61) | |
| 235 | Y | S | 252 (99.21) | |
| 294 | N | K | 252 (99.21) |
Figure 3Flow chart of sample selection in this study.