Literature DB >> 23616886

An evaluation of the usability of a computerized decision support system for nursing homes.

M Fossum, M Ehnfors, A Fruhling, A Ehrenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) have the potential to significantly improve the quality of nursing care of older people by enhancing the decision making of nursing personnel. Despite this potential, health care organizations have been slow to incorporate CDSSs into nursing home practices.
OBJECTIVE: This study describes facilitators and barriers that impact the ability of nursing personnel to effectively use a clinical CDSS for planning and treating pressure ulcers (PUs) and malnutrition and for following the suggested risk assessment guidelines for the care of nursing home residents.
METHODS: We employed a qualitative descriptive design using varied methods, including structured group interviews, cognitive walkthrough observations and a graphical user interface (GUI) usability evaluation. Group interviews were conducted with 25 nursing personnel from four nursing homes in southern Norway. Five nursing personnel participated in cognitive walkthrough observations and the GUI usability evaluation. Text transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
RESULTS: Group interview participants reported that ease of use, usefulness and a supportive work environment were key facilitators of CDSS use. The barriers identified were lack of training, resistance to using computers and limited integration of the CDSS with the facility's electronic health record (EHR) system. Key findings from the usability evaluation also identified the difficulty of using the CDSS within the EHR and the poorly designed GUI integration as barriers.
CONCLUSION: Overall, we found disconnect between two types of nursing personnel. Those who were comfortable with computer technology reported positive feedback about the CDSS, while others expressed resistance to using the CDSS for various reasons. This study revealed that organizations must invest more resources in educating nursing personnel on the seriousness of PUs and poor nutrition in the elderly, providing specialized CDSS training and ensuring that nursing personnel have time in the workday to use the CDSS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computerized; content analysis; decision support system; graphical user interface evaluation; nursing homes; qualitative

Year:  2011        PMID: 23616886      PMCID: PMC3613005          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2011-07-RA-0043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  28 in total

1.  Organisational influences on nurses' use of clinical decision support systems.

Authors:  Rebecca Randell; Dawn Dowding
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Health care spending and use of information technology in OECD countries.

Authors:  Gerard F Anderson; Bianca K Frogner; Roger A Johns; Uwe E Reinhardt
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Analysis of an integrated clinical decision support system in nursing home clinical information systems.

Authors:  Gregory L Alexander
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.254

4.  A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: methodological aspects and empirical evidence.

Authors:  Monique W M Jaspers
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  Implementing a clinical decision-support system in practice: a qualitative analysis of influencing attitudes and characteristics among general practitioners.

Authors:  Eva Toth-Pal; Inger Wårdh; Lars-Erik Strender; Gunnar Nilsson
Journal:  Inform Health Soc Care       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.439

6.  Barriers to use of information and computer technology by Australia's nurses: a national survey.

Authors:  Robert Eley; Tony Fallon; Jeffrey Soar; Elizabeth Buikstra; Desley Hegney
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 7.  The attitudes of health care staff to information technology: a comprehensive review of the research literature.

Authors:  Rod Ward; Christine Stevens; Philip Brentnall; Jason Briddon
Journal:  Health Info Libr J       Date:  2008-06

8.  Clinical decision support systems in nursing: synthesis of the science for evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Jane A Anderson; Pamela Willson
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Information technology sophistication in nursing homes.

Authors:  Gregory L Alexander; Douglas S Wakefield
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.669

Review 10.  A systematic review of the designs of clinical technology: findings and recommendations for future research.

Authors:  Greg Alexander; Nancy Staggers
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.824

View more
  8 in total

1.  Nurses' perceptions of a novel health information technology: A qualitative study in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Onur Asan; Kathryn E Flynn; Laila Azam; Matthew C Scanlon
Journal:  Int J Hum Comput Interact       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.353

2.  Provider Use of a Novel EHR display in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Large Customizable Interactive Monitor (LCIM).

Authors:  Onur Asan; Richard J Holden; Kathryn E Flynn; Yushi Yang; Laila Azam; Matthew C Scanlon
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Global Scientific Research Landscape on Medical Informatics From 2011 to 2020: Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Xuefei He; Cheng Peng; Yingxin Xu; Ye Zhang; Zhongqing Wang
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-04-21

4.  Can smartphones and tablets improve the management of childhood illness in Tanzania? A qualitative study from a primary health care worker's perspective.

Authors:  Amani Flexson Shao; Clotilde Rambaud-Althaus; Ndeniria Swai; Judith Kahama-Maro; Blaise Genton; Valerie D'Acremont; Constanze Pfeiffer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Health workers' knowledge of and attitudes towards computer applications in rural African health facilities.

Authors:  Felix Sukums; Nathan Mensah; Rose Mpembeni; Jens Kaltschmidt; Walter E Haefeli; Antje Blank
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 2.640

6.  Staff perspectives on the usability of electronic patient records for planning and delivering dementia care in nursing homes: a multiple case study.

Authors:  Kate Shiells; Angie Alejandra Diaz Baquero; Olga Štěpánková; Iva Holmerová
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 7.  Nursing Home Implementation of Health Information Technology: Review of the Literature Finds Inadequate Investment in Preparation, Infrastructure, and Training.

Authors:  Michelle Ko; Laura Wagner; Joanne Spetz
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 8.  Systematic review of applied usability metrics within usability evaluation methods for hospital electronic healthcare record systems: Metrics and Evaluation Methods for eHealth Systems.

Authors:  Marta Weronika Wronikowska; James Malycha; Lauren J Morgan; Verity Westgate; Tatjana Petrinic; J Duncan Young; Peter J Watkinson
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.336

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.