OBJECTIVE:Psychostimulant medications are the gold standard of treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); however, a significant minority (∼30%) of individuals with ADHD fail to respond favorably. Noradrenergic agents are increasingly used as ADHD monotherapies or adjuncts for suboptimal stimulant response, yet knowledge of their cortical effects is limited. This study is the first to examine comparative effects of guanfacine (an α adrenergic 2A agonist), psychostimulant, and their combination on resting state cortical activity in ADHD. METHOD: The sample comprised 179 participants aged 7 to 14 years old with ADHD (113 boys, 55 girls). Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 blinded conditions: guanfacine (GUAN), d-methylphenidate (DMPH), or the combination (COMB). Electroencephalography (EEG) was performed pre-, mid-, and post-medication titration, with concomitant assessment of behavioral and cognitive functioning. RESULTS: Analyses of spectral power measures during resting EEG suggested that each medication condition displayed a distinct profile of effects on cortical activity. Significant time effects suggested that GUAN decreased global alpha band (8-12 hertz [Hz]) power, DMPH and COMB increased centro-parietal beta band (13-21 Hz) power, and COMB resulted in decreased theta band (4-7 Hz) power. Relative to other medication groups, COMB was associated with significantly lower theta band power and DMPH with higher beta band power compared with those in the GUAN group. Medication-related changes in theta power were correlated with improvements in behavioral and cognitive functioning. CONCLUSION: These data reveal distinct underlying medication-related effects on neural mechanisms. The COMB condition uniquely exhibited an EEG profile that was associated with improved behavioral and cognitive functioning. Clinical trial registration information-Single Versus Combination Medication Treatment for Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder; http://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT00429273.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Psychostimulant medications are the gold standard of treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); however, a significant minority (∼30%) of individuals with ADHD fail to respond favorably. Noradrenergic agents are increasingly used as ADHD monotherapies or adjuncts for suboptimal stimulant response, yet knowledge of their cortical effects is limited. This study is the first to examine comparative effects of guanfacine (an α adrenergic 2A agonist), psychostimulant, and their combination on resting state cortical activity in ADHD. METHOD: The sample comprised 179 participants aged 7 to 14 years old with ADHD (113 boys, 55 girls). Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 blinded conditions: guanfacine (GUAN), d-methylphenidate (DMPH), or the combination (COMB). Electroencephalography (EEG) was performed pre-, mid-, and post-medication titration, with concomitant assessment of behavioral and cognitive functioning. RESULTS: Analyses of spectral power measures during resting EEG suggested that each medication condition displayed a distinct profile of effects on cortical activity. Significant time effects suggested that GUAN decreased global alpha band (8-12 hertz [Hz]) power, DMPH and COMB increased centro-parietal beta band (13-21 Hz) power, and COMB resulted in decreased theta band (4-7 Hz) power. Relative to other medication groups, COMB was associated with significantly lower theta band power and DMPH with higher beta band power compared with those in the GUAN group. Medication-related changes in theta power were correlated with improvements in behavioral and cognitive functioning. CONCLUSION: These data reveal distinct underlying medication-related effects on neural mechanisms. The COMB condition uniquely exhibited an EEG profile that was associated with improved behavioral and cognitive functioning. Clinical trial registration information-Single Versus Combination Medication Treatment for Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder; http://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT00429273.
Authors: Daniel J Simmonds; Sunaina G Fotedar; Stacy J Suskauer; James J Pekar; Martha B Denckla; Stewart H Mostofsky Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2007-01-21 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Joseph Biederman; Raun D Melmed; Anil Patel; Keith McBurnett; Jennifer Konow; Andrew Lyne; Noreen Scherer Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kurt P Schulz; Suzanne M Clerkin; Jin Fan; Jeffrey M Halperin; Jeffrey H Newcorn Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2012-10-20 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Anita D Barber; Lisa A Jacobson; Joanna L Wexler; Mary Beth Nebel; Brian S Caffo; James J Pekar; Stewart H Mostofsky Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Agatha Lenartowicz; Holly Truong; Giulia C Salgari; Robert M Bilder; James McGough; James T McCracken; Sandra K Loo Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: James J McGough; Alexandra Sturm; Jennifer Cowen; Kelly Tung; Giulia C Salgari; Andrew F Leuchter; Ian A Cook; Catherine A Sugar; Sandra K Loo Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Jeong Ha Park; Ji Sun Hong; Doug Hyun Han; Kyoung Joon Min; Young Sik Lee; Baik Seok Kee; Sun Mi Kim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Kristin N Meyer; Rosario Santillana; Brian Miller; Wes Clapp; Marcus Way; Katrina Bridgman-Goines; Margaret A Sheridan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ole Jakob Storebø; Nadia Pedersen; Erica Ramstad; Maja Lærke Kielsholm; Signe Sofie Nielsen; Helle B Krogh; Carlos R Moreira-Maia; Frederik L Magnusson; Mathilde Holmskov; Trine Gerner; Maria Skoog; Susanne Rosendal; Camilla Groth; Donna Gillies; Kirsten Buch Rasmussen; Dorothy Gauci; Morris Zwi; Richard Kirubakaran; Sasja J Håkonsen; Lise Aagaard; Erik Simonsen; Christian Gluud Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-05-09