Cauane Blumenberg1, Aluísio J D Barros. 1. Cauane Blumenberg, Postgraduate Programme in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil, 1160 Marechal Deodoro St. - 3rd floor, Pelotas, RS, 96020-220, Brazil, Phone: +55 53 32841300, Email: cauane.epi@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the use of Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) to conduct one of the follow-up waves of the 2004 Pelotas birth cohort. The aim is to point out the advantages and limitations of using this electronic data capture environment to collect data and control every step of a longitudinal epidemiological research, specially in terms of time savings and data quality. METHODS: We used REDCap as the main tool to support the conduction of a birth cohort follow-up. By exploiting several REDCap features, we managed to schedule assessments, collect data, and control the study workflow. To enhance data quality, we developed specific reports and field validations to depict inconsistencies in real time. RESULTS: Using REDCap it was possible to investigate more variables without significant increases on the data collection time, when comparing to a previous birth cohort follow-up. In addition, better data quality was achieved since negligible out of range errors and no validation or missing inconsistencies were identified after applying over 7,000 interviews. CONCLUSIONS: Adopting electronic data capture solutions, such as REDCap, in epidemiological research can bring several advantages over traditional paper-based data collection methods. In favor of improving their features, more research groups should migrate from paper to electronic-based epidemiological research.
OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the use of Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) to conduct one of the follow-up waves of the 2004 Pelotas birth cohort. The aim is to point out the advantages and limitations of using this electronic data capture environment to collect data and control every step of a longitudinal epidemiological research, specially in terms of time savings and data quality. METHODS: We used REDCap as the main tool to support the conduction of a birth cohort follow-up. By exploiting several REDCap features, we managed to schedule assessments, collect data, and control the study workflow. To enhance data quality, we developed specific reports and field validations to depict inconsistencies in real time. RESULTS: Using REDCap it was possible to investigate more variables without significant increases on the data collection time, when comparing to a previous birth cohort follow-up. In addition, better data quality was achieved since negligible out of range errors and no validation or missing inconsistencies were identified after applying over 7,000 interviews. CONCLUSIONS: Adopting electronic data capture solutions, such as REDCap, in epidemiological research can bring several advantages over traditional paper-based data collection methods. In favor of improving their features, more research groups should migrate from paper to electronic-based epidemiological research.
Keywords:
Epidemiology; electronic data capture; medical informatics; public health informatics; translational research
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: C M Schooling; W M Chan; S L Leung; T H Lam; S Y Lee; C Shen; J Y Leung; G M Leung Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Aluísio J D Barros; Iná S Santos; Alicia Matijasevich; Cora L Araújo; Denise P Gigante; Ana M B Menezes; Bernardo L Horta; Elaine Tomasi; Cesar G Victora; Fernando C Barros Journal: Cad Saude Publica Date: 2008 Impact factor: 1.632
Authors: Marleen H van den Berg; Annelies Overbeek; Helena J van der Pal; A Birgitta Versluys; Dorine Bresters; Flora E van Leeuwen; Cornelis B Lambalk; Gertjan J L Kaspers; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Iná S Santos; Aluísio J D Barros; Alicia Matijasevich; Roberta Zanini; Maria Aurora Chrestani Cesar; Fabio Alberto Camargo-Figuera; Isabel O Oliveira; Fernando C Barros; Cesar G Victora Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Helen Gonçalves; Maria Cf Assunção; Fernando C Wehrmeister; Isabel O Oliveira; Fernando C Barros; Cesar G Victora; Pedro C Hallal; Ana Mb Menezes Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2014-04-11 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Sina Kianersi; Maya Luetke; Christina Ludema; Alexander Valenzuela; Molly Rosenberg Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2021-08-21 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Yann Lambert; Muriel Galindo; Martha Suárez-Mutis; Louise Mutricy; Alice Sanna; Laure Garancher; Hedley Cairo; Helene Hiwat; Jane Bordalo Miller; José Hermenegildo Gomes; Paola Marchesini; Antoine Adenis; Mathieu Nacher; Stephen Vreden; Maylis Douine Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2022-06-16
Authors: Brenda Anna Kwambana-Adams; Adam L Cohen; Lee Hampton; Aquino Albino Nhantumbo; Robert S Heyderman; Martin Antonio; Andre Bita; Jason Mathiu Mwenda Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Jessica Andriesen; Sheana Bull; Janan Dietrich; Jessica E Haberer; Barbara Van Der Pol; Yegor Voronin; Kristin M Wall; Christopher Whalen; Frances Priddy Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 5.428