| Literature DB >> 27452615 |
H-W Cheng1,1, J-N Dienemann1,1, P Stock1,1, C Merola1,1, Y-J Chen1,1, M Valtiner1,2.
Abstract
Tuning chemical structure and molecular layering of ionic liquids (IL) at solid interfaces offers leverage to tailor performance of ILs in applications such as super-capacitors, catalysis or lubrication. Recent experimental interpretations suggest that ILs containing cations with long hydrophobic tails form well-ordered bilayers at interfaces. Here we demonstrate that interfacial bilayer formation is not an intrinsic quality of hydrophobic ILs. In contrast, bilayer formation is triggered by boundary conditions including confinement, surface charging and humidity present in the IL. Therefore, we performed force versus distance profiles using atomic force microscopy and the surface forces apparatus. Our results support models of disperse low-density bilayer formation in confined situations, at high surface charging and/or in the presence of water. Conversely, interfacial structuring of long-chain ILs in dry environments and at low surface charging is disordered and dominated by bulk structuring. Our results demonstrate that boundary conditions such as charging, confinement and doping by impurities have decisive influence on structure formation of ILs at interfaces. As such, these results have important implications for understanding the behavior of solid/IL interfaces as they significantly extend previous interpretations.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27452615 PMCID: PMC4958918 DOI: 10.1038/srep30058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic of force probe measurements between two apposing surfaces across ionic liquids under macroscopically confined and nano-confined geometries by using (a) surface force apparatus and (b) atomic force microscopy, respectively. (c) The imidazolium based ionic liquids with different length of hydrophobic unit were used in this study (cf. text for details).
Figure 2AFM based 2-dimension-force distance (2D-FD) spectroscopy of (a,c,e) [C2min][Tf2N] and (b,d,f) [C8min][Tf2N] at various water concentrations as indicated. All 2D-FD plots were generated from 40 random selected AFM force distance measurements (cf. text for details).
Figure 3SFA force versus distance characteristics of (a) [C2min][Tf2N] and (b) [C8min][Tf2N] during compression between two mica surfaces in dry (black), with 43% humidity equilibrated (red), and water saturated (blue) ILs.
Figure 4Schematic interpretation of the interfacial structures of [C2MIm][Tf2N] and [C8MIm] [Tf2N] on mica surface with various water contents under (a,d) no confinement (AFM), (b,e) confinement at distances of a few molecular diameters and (c,f) hard compression in confinement with SFA.