Lily Gutnik1, Clara Lee2, Vanessa Msosa3, Agnes Moses4, Christopher Stanley5, Suzgo Mzumara6, N George Liomba5, Satish Gopal7. 1. UNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi. Electronic address: lily.gutnik@mail.harvard.edu. 2. UNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi; University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 3. Department of Surgery, Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi. 4. UNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi; University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi; University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi. 5. UNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi. 6. Department or Radiology, Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi; University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi. 7. UNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi; University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer awareness and early detection are limited in sub-Saharan Africa. Resource limitations make screening mammography or clinical breast examination (CBE) by physicians or nurses impractical in many settings. We aimed to assess feasibility and performance of CBE by laywomen in urban health clinics in Malawi. METHODS: Four laywomen were trained to deliver breast cancer educational talks and conduct CBE. After training, screening was implemented in diverse urban health clinics. Eligible women were ≥30 y, with no prior breast cancer or breast surgery, and clinic attendance for reasons other than a breast concern. Women with abnormal CBE were referred to a study surgeon. All palpable masses confirmed by surgeon examination were pathologically sampled. Patients with abnormal screening CBE but normal surgeon examination underwent breast ultrasound confirmation. In addition, 50 randomly selected women with normal screening CBE underwent breast ultrasound, and 45 different women with normal CBE were randomly assigned to surgeon examination. RESULTS: Among 1220 eligible women, 1000 (82%) agreed to CBE. Lack of time (69%) was the commonest reason for refusal. Educational talk attendance was associated with higher CBE participation (83% versus 77%, P = 0.012). Among 1000 women screened, 7% had abnormal CBE. Of 45 women with normal CBE randomized to physician examination, 43 had normal examinations and two had axillary lymphadenopathy not detected by CBE. Sixty of 67 women (90%) with abnormal CBE attended the referral visit. Of these, 29 (48%) had concordant abnormal physician examination. Thirty-one women (52%) had discordant normal physician examination, all of whom also had normal breast ultrasounds. Compared with physician examination, sensitivity for CBE by laywomen was 94% (confidence interval [CI] 79%-99%), specificity 58% (CI, 46%-70%), positive predictive value 48% (CI, 35%-62%), and negative predictive value 96% (CI, 85%-100%). Of 13 women who underwent recommended pathologic sampling of a breast lesion, two had cytologic dysplasia and all others benign results. CONCLUSIONS: CBE uptake in Lilongwe clinics was high. CBE by laywomen compared favorably with physician examination and follow-up was good. Our intervention can serve as a model for wider implementation. Performance in rural areas, effects on cancer stage and mortality, and cost effectiveness require evaluation.
BACKGROUND:Breast cancer awareness and early detection are limited in sub-Saharan Africa. Resource limitations make screening mammography or clinical breast examination (CBE) by physicians or nurses impractical in many settings. We aimed to assess feasibility and performance of CBE by laywomen in urban health clinics in Malawi. METHODS: Four laywomen were trained to deliver breast cancer educational talks and conduct CBE. After training, screening was implemented in diverse urban health clinics. Eligible women were ≥30 y, with no prior breast cancer or breast surgery, and clinic attendance for reasons other than a breast concern. Women with abnormal CBE were referred to a study surgeon. All palpable masses confirmed by surgeon examination were pathologically sampled. Patients with abnormal screening CBE but normal surgeon examination underwent breast ultrasound confirmation. In addition, 50 randomly selected women with normal screening CBE underwent breast ultrasound, and 45 different women with normal CBE were randomly assigned to surgeon examination. RESULTS: Among 1220 eligible women, 1000 (82%) agreed to CBE. Lack of time (69%) was the commonest reason for refusal. Educational talk attendance was associated with higher CBE participation (83% versus 77%, P = 0.012). Among 1000 women screened, 7% had abnormal CBE. Of 45 women with normal CBE randomized to physician examination, 43 had normal examinations and two had axillary lymphadenopathy not detected by CBE. Sixty of 67 women (90%) with abnormal CBE attended the referral visit. Of these, 29 (48%) had concordant abnormal physician examination. Thirty-one women (52%) had discordant normal physician examination, all of whom also had normal breast ultrasounds. Compared with physician examination, sensitivity for CBE by laywomen was 94% (confidence interval [CI] 79%-99%), specificity 58% (CI, 46%-70%), positive predictive value 48% (CI, 35%-62%), and negative predictive value 96% (CI, 85%-100%). Of 13 women who underwent recommended pathologic sampling of a breast lesion, two had cytologic dysplasia and all others benign results. CONCLUSIONS: CBE uptake in Lilongwe clinics was high. CBE by laywomen compared favorably with physician examination and follow-up was good. Our intervention can serve as a model for wider implementation. Performance in rural areas, effects on cancer stage and mortality, and cost effectiveness require evaluation.
Authors: Benjamin O Anderson; Cheng-Har Yip; Robert A Smith; Roman Shyyan; Stephen F Sener; Alexandru Eniu; Robert W Carlson; Edward Azavedo; Joe Harford Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Michael P Lux; Julius Emons; Mayada R Bani; Marius Wunderle; Charlotte Sell; Caroline Preuss; Claudia Rauh; Sebastian M Jud; Felix Heindl; Hanna Langemann; Thomas Geyer; Anna-Lisa Brandl; Carolin C Hack; Werner Adler; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Matthias W Beckmann; Peter A Fasching; Paul Gass Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Anna J Dare; Gregory C Knapp; Anya Romanoff; Olalekan Olasehinde; Olusola C Famurewa; Akinwumi O Komolafe; Samuel Olatoke; Aba Katung; Olusegun I Alatise; T Peter Kingham Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2021-09-10
Authors: Taylor Hand; Natalie A Rosseau; Christina E Stiles; Tianna Sheih; Elizabeth Ghandakly; Mojisola Oluwasanu; Olufunmilayo I Olopade Journal: Glob Health Action Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 2.640