Literature DB >> 12875596

Screening clinical breast examination.

Ismail Jatoi1.   

Abstract

Evidence suggests that CBE detects most breast cancers found by mammograms, and also some that mammograms miss, particularly in younger women. Recent estimates suggest that screening CBE has a sensitivity of about 54% and a specificity of about 94%. Yet, the impact of screening CBE on breast cancer mortality is still not clear, as there are no trials that have reported results comparing screening CBE alone to no screening. In some countries, the costs of screening mammography are considered too high, and policy makers are considering implementing screening programs based on CBE rather than mammography. In those countries with screening mammography programs already in place, screening CBE should also be included, as this will increase the overall sensitivity of breast cancer screening. Studies have shown that community health workers can be trained to conduct screening CBE, and that trained nurses perform CBE as well as physicians. Physicians should take on the responsibility to ensure that screening CBE is performed properly, however, and that it remains an integral part of all screening mammography programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12875596     DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00028-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Clin North Am        ISSN: 0039-6109            Impact factor:   2.741


  10 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of clinical breast assessment-based screening in rural Egypt.

Authors:  Adel Denewer; Osama Hussein; Omar Farouk; Waleed Elnahas; Ashraf Khater; Aiman El-Saed
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Breast Cancer Screening: a Paradigm Change Is Needed-the PB Desai Oration.

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-03

3.  Clinical breast examination screening by trained laywomen in Malawi integrated with other health services.

Authors:  Lily Gutnik; Clara Lee; Vanessa Msosa; Agnes Moses; Christopher Stanley; Suzgo Mzumara; N George Liomba; Satish Gopal
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Evaluation of Simulated Clinical Breast Exam Motion Patterns Using Marker-Less Video Tracking.

Authors:  David P Azari; Carla M Pugh; Shlomi Laufer; Calvin Kwan; Chia-Hsiung Chen; Thomas Y Yen; Yu Hen Hu; Robert G Radwin
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Breast Cancer Screening in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Perspective From Malawi.

Authors:  Lily A Gutnik; Beatrice Matanje-Mwagomba; Vanessa Msosa; Suzgo Mzumara; Blandina Khondowe; Agnes Moses; Racquel E Kohler; Lisa A Carey; Clara N Lee; Satish Gopal
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2015-12-23

6.  Effectiveness of clinical breast examination as a 'stand-alone' screening modality: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Tran Thu Ngan; Nga T Q Nguyen; Hoang Van Minh; Michael Donnelly; Ciaran O'Neill
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  The Efficacy of Clinical Breast Exams and Breast Self-Exams in Detecting Malignancy or Positive Ultrasound Findings.

Authors:  Nicole Huang; Lu Chen; Jing He; Quan D Nguyen
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-21

8.  Breast cancer in Iran: need for greater women awareness of warning signs and effective screening methods.

Authors:  Ali Montazeri; Mariam Vahdaninia; Iraj Harirchi; Amir Mahmood Harirchi; Akram Sajadian; Fatemeh Khaleghi; Mandana Ebrahimi; Shahpar Haghighat; Soghra Jarvandi
Journal:  Asia Pac Fam Med       Date:  2008-12-20

9.  Performance of breast cancer screening methods and modality among Chinese women: a report from a society-based breast screening program (SBSP) in Shanghai.

Authors:  Miao Mo; Guang-Yu Liu; Ying Zheng; Lian-Fang Di; Ya-Jie Ji; Li-Lang Lv; Ying-Yao Chen; Wei-Jun Peng; Jie-Ru Zhu; Ping-Ping Bao; Jian-Hui Ding; Cai Chang; Jian-Feng Luo; Zhi-Gang Cao; Wang-Hong Xu; Zhi-Min Shao
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-06-24

10.  Cost-effectiveness of screening mammography in a low income country: a Markov simulation analysis.

Authors:  Segni Kejela
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 1.930

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.