Literature DB >> 27450708

The Argumentative Theory: Predictions and Empirical Evidence.

Hugo Mercier1.   

Abstract

The argumentative theory of reasoning suggests that the main function of reasoning is to exchange arguments with others. This theory explains key properties of reasoning. When reasoners produce arguments, they are biased and lazy, as can be expected if reasoning is a mechanism that aims at convincing others in interactive contexts. By contrast, reasoners are more objective and demanding when they evaluate arguments provided by others. This fundamental asymmetry between production and evaluation explains the effects of reasoning in different contexts: the more debate and conflict between opinions there is, the more argument evaluation prevails over argument production, resulting in better outcomes. Here I review how the argumentative theory of reasoning helps integrate a wide range of empirical findings in reasoning research.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27450708     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  14 in total

1.  The Einstein effect provides global evidence for scientific source credibility effects and the influence of religiosity.

Authors:  Suzanne Hoogeveen; Julia M Haaf; Joseph A Bulbulia; Robert M Ross; Ryan McKay; Sacha Altay; Theiss Bendixen; Renatas Berniūnas; Arik Cheshin; Claudio Gentili; Raluca Georgescu; Will M Gervais; Kristin Hagel; Christopher Kavanagh; Neil Levy; Alejandra Neely; Lin Qiu; André Rabelo; Jonathan E Ramsay; Bastiaan T Rutjens; Hugh Turpin; Filip Uzarevic; Robin Wuyts; Dimitris Xygalatas; Michiel van Elk
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-02-07

2.  Scaling up interactive argumentation by providing counterarguments with a chatbot.

Authors:  Sacha Altay; Marlène Schwartz; Anne-Sophie Hacquin; Aurélien Allard; Stefaan Blancke; Hugo Mercier
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-02-14

3.  The effects of recursive communication dynamics on belief updating.

Authors:  Niccolò Pescetelli; Nick Yeung
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Why do we remember? The communicative function of episodic memory.

Authors:  Johannes Mahr; Gergely Csibra
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 5.  Making better decisions in groups.

Authors:  Dan Bang; Chris D Frith
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 6.  Fast and slow thinking in distressing delusions: A review of the literature and implications for targeted therapy.

Authors:  Thomas Ward; Philippa A Garety
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Cognitive reflection correlates with behavior on Twitter.

Authors:  Mohsen Mosleh; Gordon Pennycook; Antonio A Arechar; David G Rand
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Modularity and composite diversity affect the collective gathering of information online.

Authors:  Niccolò Pescetelli; Alex Rutherford; Iyad Rahwan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Evidence Linking Brain Activity Modulation to Age and to Deductive Training.

Authors:  P Álvarez Merino; C Requena; F Salto
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-11-25       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Witnessing, Remembering, and Testifying: Why the Past Is Special for Human Beings.

Authors:  Johannes B Mahr; Gergely Csibra
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.