| Literature DB >> 27450538 |
Francesco Nicoli1,2,3, Mkunde Chachage4,5, Petra Clowes5,6, Asli Bauer5,6, Dickens Kowour5, Barbara Ensoli7, Aurelio Cafaro7, Leonard Maboko5, Michael Hoelscher6,8, Riccardo Gavioli9, Elmar Saathoff6,8, Christof Geldmacher6,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The presence of IgG and IgM against Tat, an HIV protein important for viral replication and immune dysfunction, is associated with slow disease progression in clade B HIV-infected individuals. However, although Tat activities strictly depend on the viral clade, our knowledge about the importance of anti-Tat antibodies in non-clade B HIV infection is poor. The objective of this study was to investigate the association of different anti-Tat antibody isotypes with disease progression in non-clade B HIV-infected subjects and to study the relationship between anti-Tat humoral responses and immunological abnormalities.Entities:
Keywords: Antibodies; Clade B HIV; Clade C HIV; Diseases progression; Immune activation; Tat
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27450538 PMCID: PMC4957276 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-1647-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Characteristics of the HIV positive individuals included in the study (n = 96a)
| Ageb | 36.1 (28.8–42.3) | |
| Female, | 58 (60.4 %) | |
| CD4+ T cell counts (cells/μl)b | 398 (267–606) | |
| Log10 pVL (copies/ml)b | 4.7 (4.0–5.3) | |
| Duration of infection (n)c | >1 year, < 3 years | 20 |
| >3 years | 69 | |
aNot all 96 subjects had data for each of the examined parameters (CD4, n = 95; pVL, n = 89)
bValues shown are median and (Interquartile Range)
cDuration of infection could be confidentially estimated for 89 subjects out of 96
Fig. 1Prevalence and cross-clade reactivity of anti-Tat antibodies. CART-naïve, chronically HIV-infected individuals (n = 96) were tested for the presence of anti-Tat antibodies by ELISA. a Percentage of subjects with anti-clade C Tat IgG, IgA or IgM or anti-clade C Tat negative. b Number of anti-clade C Tat positive individuals able to recognize clade B Tat. c Number of subjects able to recognize clade B but not clade C Tat. d Heatmap showing, for single donors, positivity (black) or negativity (grey) toward clade C or clade B Tat for each isotype after unsupervised clustering. e Venn diagram analyses of the number of subjects recognizing clade B and/or C Tat stratified by the antibody isotype displayed
Frequency of anti-Tat antibodies and disease stage
| IgG | IgA | IgM | Negative | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD4+ T cells (cells/μl) | <200 | 7/17 (41 %) | 4/17 (24 %) | 5/17 (29 %) | 7/17 (41 %) |
| 200–500 | 23/48 (48 %) | 10/48 (21 %) | 22/48 (46 %) | 12/48 (25 %) | |
| >500 | 14/30 (47 %) | 1/30 (3 %) | 22/30 (73 %) | 6/30 (20 %) | |
|
| 0.92 | 0.05 | 0.008 | 0.27 |
aFrequency of the different anti-Tat antibody isotypes was calculated in every stratum and compared using Freeman-Halton extension of the Fisher’s exact probability test for a two-rows by three-columns contingency table
Frequency of anti-Tat antibodies according to the duration of infection
| IgG | IgA | IgM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time of infection | < 3 years | > 3 years | < 3 years | > 3 years | < 3 years | > 3 years | |
| Anti-Tat antibodies status | + | 8/20 (40 %) | 32/69 (46 %) | 1/20 (5 %) | 14/69 (20 %) | 15/20 (75 %) | 31/69 (45 %) |
| − | 12/20 (60 %) | 37/69 (54 %) | 19/20 (95 %) | 55/69 (80 %) | 5/20 (25 %) | 38/69 (55 %) | |
|
| 0.80 | 0.17 | 0.02 | ||||
aFrequency of the different anti-Tat antibody isotype was calculated in every stratum and compared using Fisher’s exact probability test
Association of different anti-Tat antibody isotypes with CD4+ T cell count and viral load
| Associationa of duration of HIV infection and anti-Tat antibody isotype with CD4+ T cell counts ( | |||||||||
| Univariate | Multivariate | ||||||||
| Covariate | Stratum |
| Mean CD4+ T cells count (cells/μL) | IRR | 95 % conf.int. |
| IRR | 95 % conf.int. |
|
| HIV infection (years) | >3 | 69 | 403 | 1 | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| ≤3 | 19 | 501 | 1.24 | (0.98 to 1.58) | 0.079 | 1.10 | (0.86 to 1.41) | 0.443 | |
| IgG | neg. | 48 | 431 | 1 | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| pos. | 40 | 415 | 0.96 | (0.76 to 1.22) | 0.764 | 0.97 | (0.77 to 1.21) | 0.761 | |
| IgM | neg. | 43 | 353 | 1 | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| pos. | 45 | 491 | 1.39 | (1.10 to 1.76) | 0.007 | 1.34 | (1.05 to 1.71) | 0.019 | |
| IgA | neg. | 73 | 448 | 1 | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| pos. | 15 | 306 | 0.68 | (0.51 to 0.91) | 0.010 | 0.73 | (0.55 to 0.95) | 0.020 | |
| Associationa of duration of HIV infection and anti-Tat antibody isotype with Log10 VL ( | |||||||||
| Univariate | Multivariate | ||||||||
| Covariate | Stratum |
| Mean viral load (Log10 copies/ml) | IRR | 95 % conf.int. |
| IRR | 95 % conf.int. |
|
| HIV infection (years) | >3 | 65 | 4.68 | 1 | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| ≤3 | 18 | 4.26 | 0.91 | (0.79 to 1.05) | 0.203 | 0.96 | (0.83 to 1.10) | 0.553 | |
| IgG | neg. | 45 | 4.47 | 1 | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| pos. | 38 | 4.74 | 1.06 | (0.96 to 1.16) | 0.230 | 1.05 | (0.96 to 1.15) | 0.284 | |
| IgM | neg. | 40 | 4.84 | 1 | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| pos. | 43 | 4.36 | 0.90 | (0.82 to 0.99) | 0.027 | 0.92 | (0.85 to 0.99) | 0.037 | |
| IgA | neg. | 68 | 4.46 | 1 | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| pos. | 15 | 5.20 | 1.17 | (1.08 to 1.26) | <0.001 | 1.13 | (1.06 to 1.21) | <0.001 | |
IRR incidence rate ratio
aPoisson regression with robust variance estimates was used to examine the association of Tat antibody isotypes with CD4+ T cell count and viral load. The table shows that the duration of HIV infection and anti-Tat IgG positivity had no significant influence on both parameters, whereas the presence of anti-Tat IgM and IgA were significantly associated with CD4+ T cell count and viral load. Anti-Tat IgM positivity was associated with higher CD4+ T cell counts and lower viral loads, whereas anti-Tat IgA positivity showed the opposite pattern. The fact that multivariate IRRs and p-values for both parameters are fairly similar to the univariate estimates suggest that these associations are independent of each other
Stratification of subjects according to anti-Tat antibody isotypes
| Antibody response (n) | Age: median (range) | Females | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isotype | ( | IgG | IgG | IgA | IgA | IgM | IgM | ||
| Tat B | Tat C | Tat B | Tat C | Tat B | Tat C |
| |||
| IgG | (13) | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 (26–45) | 9 (69 %) |
| IgA | (15) | 8 | 9 | 10 | 13 | 4 | 6 | 40 (25–55) | 6 (40 %) |
| IgM | (21) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 19 | 34 (20–54) | 16 (80 %) |
| IgM + IgG | (22) | 12 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 22 | 36 (20–61) | 13 (59 %) |
| Neg | (25) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 (19–53) | 14 (56 %) |
Fig. 2Association of anti-Tat antibody isotypes with CD4+ T cell count and viral load. Subjects were stratified according to the type and number of the anti-Tat antibody isotypes detected. Subgroups were compared for (a) CD4+ T cell count or (b) Log10 plasma viral load. Lines represent the median value. Statistical comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney test. c Subjects were plotted according to both CD4+ T cell count and Log10 plasma viral load. Empty circles represent subjects with anti-Tat IgG and/or IgM but not IgA, grey squares represent subjects with anti-Tat IgA, black triangles represent anti-Tat antibody negative subjects
Fig. 3Association of anti-Tat antibody isotypes with immunological abnormalities. a Subjects were stratified according to the activation burden. Subjects in panels (b-d) were stratified according to the type and number of anti-Tat antibody isotypes. b Subgroups were compared for CD4:CD8 ratio. c Subgroups were compared for percentages of CD38+ HLA-DR+ on CD8+ (left panel) and CD4+ T cells (right panel). d Subgroups were compared for CD8+ (left panel) and CD4+ (right panel) T cell subpopulations. Solid lines in panels (b-c) represent the median value while bars in panel (d) represent the median values with interquartile range. Statistical comparisons were made using Fisher’s exact probability test (a) and Mann-Whitney test (b-d)
Fig. 4Association of different anti-Tat antibody isotypes with disease progression. a Subjects were stratified according to the tertiles of CD4+ T cell decline. Black bars represent subjects with any anti-Tat antibody isotype (top panel) or with anti-Tat IgG and IgM (bottom panel). Statistical comparisons were made using Fisher’s exact probability test. b Subjects were stratified according to the type and number of anti-Tat antibody isotypes. Subgroups were compared for absolute differences of CD38+HLA-DR+CD8+ T and CD38+HLA-DR+CD4+ T cell percentages. Absolute differences were obtained by subtracting baseline values from values collected at 1 year follow up visit. Data are presented as Box-and-Whisker Plots. Statistical significance of absolute difference was calculated using Wilcoxon signed rank test; p-values < 0.05 indicates that differences are significantly different from 0