Literature DB >> 25922127

Intra-individual variability in the response to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.

Virginia López-Alonso1, Miguel Fernández-Del-Olmo1, Alessia Costantini1, Juan Jose Gonzalez-Henriquez2, Binith Cheeran3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the intra-individual reliability in response to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (AtDCS).
METHODS: 45 healthy subjects received AtDCS (1 mA, 13 min) in two separate sessions, 6-12 months apart. Motor evoked potentials were collected at baseline and then at 5-min intervals after AtDCS for 1h. Short intracortical inhibition (SICI) was assessed at minutes 6 and 46 after AtDCS.
RESULTS: AtDCS increased cortical excitability over minutes 0-30 post-stimulation in both sessions, with fair intra-individual reliability. 60% and 64% of subjects responded with the expected increase in cortical excitability in each session, respectively. 69% of the subjects maintained their response pattern between sessions during this timeframe. However, there were no significant effects on cortical excitability over the full hour post AtDCS in either session. SICI showed fair intra-individual reliability 6 min after AtDCS.
CONCLUSION: A change in cortical excitability in the first half-hour post-AtDCS may be a good predictor of the response in a subsequent session. Furthermore, minute 15 post-stimulation showed the maximum increase in cortical excitability in both sessions. SIGNIFICANCE: We show for the first time that intra-individual variability is lower than inter-individual variability, and with fair intra-individual inter-sessional reliability for 30 min after AtDCS-subjects are likely to maintain their response patterns to tDCS between sessions, with implications for experimental and therapeutic applications of tDCS.
Copyright © 2015 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortical plasticity; Inter-individual variability; Intra-individual variability; Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25922127     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  47 in total

1.  Neurophysiological and behavioural effects of dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation on the proximal upper limb.

Authors:  Alana B McCambridge; James W Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Individual differences in TMS sensitivity influence the efficacy of tDCS in facilitating sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  L Labruna; A Stark-Inbar; A Breska; M Dabit; B Vanderschelden; M A Nitsche; R B Ivry
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Motor cortical plasticity in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - Electromyography studies.

Authors:  Urvakhsh Meherwan Mehta; Milind Vijay Thanki; Jaya Padmanabhan; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Matcheri S Keshavan
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates GABA Levels Beyond the Stimulated Region: Perspectives for Stroke Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Takahiro Inoue; Kenji Taneda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Non-linear changes to corticospinal excitability induced with increasing intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander D Tang; Kartik K Iyer; Ann-Maree Vallence; Hakuei Fujiyama
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Asif Jamil; Giorgi Batsikadze; Hsiao-I Kuo; Ludovica Labruna; Alkomiet Hasan; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  One MRI-compatible tDCS session attenuates ventromedial cortical perfusion when exposed to verbal criticism: The role of perceived criticism.

Authors:  Chris Baeken; Josefien Dedoncker; Jonathan Remue; Guo-Rong Wu; Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt; Sara De Witte; Tasha Poppa; Jill M Hooley; Rudi De Raedt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Response variability of different anodal transcranial direct current stimulation intensities across multiple sessions.

Authors:  Claudia Ammann; Martin A Lindquist; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 9.  Plasticity of Sensorimotor Networks: Multiple Overlapping Mechanisms.

Authors:  Ethan R Buch; Sook-Lei Liew; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 7.519

10.  Facilitatory non-invasive brain stimulation in older adults: the effect of stimulation type and duration on the induction of motor cortex plasticity.

Authors:  Rohan Puri; Mark R Hinder; Alison J Canty; Jeffery J Summers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.