Literature DB >> 2744915

Long term results of arthrodesis for severe osteoarthritis of the hip in young adults.

M Sofue1, S Kono, W Kawaji, M Homma.   

Abstract

We examined 40 patients (12 men, 28 women) who had undergone hip arthrodesis for severe osteoarthritis more than 15 years previously. Twenty-one cases were due to congenital dislocation of the hip. The age at fusion was mostly between 30 and 39 years. There was no case in which the position of fusion was unsatisfactory. At follow-up, 26 patients had back pain, 9 had pain in the same knee, 2 in the opposite knee and 3 had pain in both knees. Pain in the opposite hip occurred in 5 patients who had slight osteoarthritic changes on the preoperative radiographs. Every patient had been able to return to his or her previous occupation. Thirty-five had some difficulty in bending during Japanese-style sitting, but all could walk for more than 30 minutes without any difficulty. All but two were satisfied with the operation and none of them wanted to have a total hip replacement. In spite of the disadvantages of arthrodesis of the hip, such as the limitation of some activities and the effect on neighbouring joints, most patients were very satisfied with the result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2744915     DOI: 10.1007/bf00266374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  6 in total

1.  Function following arthrodesis for coxarthrosis with special reference to the mobile hip.

Authors:  G Gudmundsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1972

2.  The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention.

Authors:  J Charnley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1972-02

3.  Total hip replacement in patients younger than thirty years old. A five-year follow-up study.

Authors:  H P Chandler; F T Reineck; R L Wixson; J C McCarthy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  15-21-year results of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty.

Authors:  B M Wroblewski
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Hip arthrodesis in young patients. A long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  P D Sponseller; A A McBeath; M Perpich
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Hip arthrodesis. A long-term follow-up.

Authors:  J J Callaghan; R A Brand; D R Pedersen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.284

  6 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Total knee arthroplasty in patients with prior ipsilateral hip arthrodesis.

Authors:  Borja de la Hera; Rafael Rubio-Quevedo; Angeles Gomez-Garcia; Alejandro Gomez-Rice
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-10-27

2.  Is total hip arthroplasty after hip arthrodesis as good as primary arthroplasty?

Authors:  Mariano Fernandez-Fairen; Antonio Murcia-Mazón; Ana Torres; Virginia Querales; Antonio Murcia
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Results and experiences of conversion of hip arthrodesis ].

Authors:  A Schuh; G Zeiler; S Werber
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Arthrodesis of the hip and its conversion].

Authors:  G Zeiler; A Schuh
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  The long-term fate of the hip arthrodesis: does it remain a valid procedure for selected cases in the 21st century?

Authors:  Matthias U Schafroth; Reinoud J Blokzijl; Daniël Haverkamp; Mario Maas; René K Marti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Hip arthrodesis with the anterolateral plate: an innovating technique for an orphaned procedure.

Authors:  Patrick Hoekman; Garba Idé; Akambi Sanoussi Kassoumou; Mahamadou Malam Hayatou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.