Literature DB >> 15517157

[Results and experiences of conversion of hip arthrodesis ].

A Schuh1, G Zeiler, S Werber.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: With the predictably good outcome of total hip arthroplasty today (THA), hip arthrodesis currently has limited indications. Over the long term, however, most patients develop secondary degenerative arthritis in the spine, contralateral hip, and ipsilateral knee due to overloading. The deteriorating condition of these joints eventually causes the onset of pain, which often requires conversion of a fused hip to a THA. The results and experiences of conversions of a hip arthrodesis into a THA are reported.
INTRODUCTION: Between 1 January 1985 and 31 December 2001 conversion of a previously performed arthrodesis of the hip to THA was carried out in a total of 45 patients; 34 patients could be followed up after the conversion to THA after a mean of 77.5 months (min.: 24, max.: 208). The primary indications for the conversion were low back pain (n=21) and ipsilateral knee pain (n=13).
RESULTS: The mean age at the time of THA was 75.3 years (min.: 32, max.: 74). The mean time interval between the arthrodesis and the conversion to THA was 30.4 years (min.: 5, max.: 66). Of 34 hips, 29 (85%) were either pain free or had minimal pain. Complications included one persisting sciatic nerve palsy, two superficial infections, two periprosthetic fractures, and two heterotopic ossifications IV degrees with one recurrence of ankylosis and one marked reduction of motion. Revision arthroplasty was performed in four hips. Postoperatively 7 patients showed no limping, 11 showed a slight limp, and 17 a pronounced limp. Recurrent dislocations occurred in one patient.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that this operation can lead to satisfactory results even after a long duration of the arthrodesis. There is a high rate of complications after conversion of a hip arthrodesis to a total hip arthroplasty. These issues must be carefully considered and discussed with the patient before any conversion procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15517157     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-004-0723-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  31 in total

1.  Total joint replacement for ankylosed hips. Indications , technique, and preliminary results.

Authors:  H C Amstutz; D N Sakai
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Conversion of fused hips to low friction arthroplasty.

Authors:  K Hardinge; D Williams; A Etienne; D MacKenzie; J Charnley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1977-11

3.  Low-friction arthroplasty of the hip for the failures of previous operations.

Authors:  J A Dupont; J Charnley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1972-02

4.  Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification.

Authors:  A F Brooker; J W Bowerman; R A Robinson; L H Riley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Conversion of hip arthrodesis to total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  K P Panagiotopoulos; G M Robbins; B A Masri; C P Duncan
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2001

7.  Hip and knee replacement after longstanding hip arthrodesis.

Authors:  M Rittmeister; M Starker; L Zichner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  [Endoprosthetic management of patients with hip arthrodesis].

Authors:  A R Wölfel; M Walther; C Rader; H Beck
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug

9.  Conversion of ankylosed hips to total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J D Lubahn; C M Evarts; J B Feltner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Contralateral total hip arthroplasty or ipsilateral total knee arthroplasty in patients who have a long-standing fusion of the hip.

Authors:  K L Garvin; P M Pellicci; R E Windsor; E U Conrad; J N Insall; E A Salvati
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  6 in total

1.  Is total hip arthroplasty after hip arthrodesis as good as primary arthroplasty?

Authors:  Mariano Fernandez-Fairen; Antonio Murcia-Mazón; Ana Torres; Virginia Querales; Antonio Murcia
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Long-term results of custom cementless-stem total hip arthroplasty performed in hip fusion.

Authors:  Xavier Flecher; Matthieu Ollivier; Pascal Maman; Sébastien Pesenti; Sébastien Parratte; Jean-Noël Argenson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Hip fusion takedown with total knee and hip arthroplasty in a patient with end-stage chronic kidney disease - a case report and narrative literature review.

Authors:  Wojciech Konarski; Tomasz Poboży; Martyna Hordowicz
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-05-31

4.  Not all primary total hip arthroplasties are equal-so is there a difference in reimbursement?

Authors:  Nipun Sodhi; Sarah E Dalton; Luke J Garbarino; Peter A Gold; Nicolas S Piuzzi; Jared M Newman; Anton Khlopas; Assem A Sultan; Morad Chughtai; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-02

5.  Ceramic on ceramic hip arthroplasty in fused hips.

Authors:  Kyung-Soon Park; Taek-Rim Yoon; Tae-Min Lee; Yeong-Seub Ahn
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Hip arthrodesis with the anterolateral plate: an innovating technique for an orphaned procedure.

Authors:  Patrick Hoekman; Garba Idé; Akambi Sanoussi Kassoumou; Mahamadou Malam Hayatou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.