Alejandro Sanchez-Crespo1,2, Frederik Christiansson3, Charlotte Karlsson Thur4, Henrik Lundblad4, Anders Sundin5. 1. Department of Hospital Physics, Nuclear medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. alejandro.sanchez-crespo@karolinska.se. 2. Karolinska University Hospital, Nuklearmedicin A3:01, S-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden. alejandro.sanchez-crespo@karolinska.se. 3. Department of Radiology, Nyköpings Hospital, Nyköping, Sweden. 4. Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 5. Department of Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is used to correct orthopedic conditions such as correction osteotomies in delayed fracture healing and pseudarthrosis. Long-term TSF-treatments are common and may lead to complications. Current conventional radiological methods are often unsatisfactory for therapy monitoring. Hence, an imaging technique capable of quantifying bone healing progression would be advantageous. METHODS: A cohort of 24 patients with different orthopedic conditions, pseudarthrosis (n = 10), deformities subjected to correction osteotomy (n = 9), and fracture (n = 5) underwent dynamic [18F]-fluoride (Na18F) PET/CT at 8 weeks and 4 months, respectively, after application of a TSF. Parametric images, corresponding to the net transport rate of [18F]-fluoride from plasma to bone, K i were calculated. The ratio of the maximum K i at PET scan 2 and 1 ([Formula: see text]) as well as the ratio of the maximum Standard Uptake Value at PET scan 2 and 1 ([Formula: see text]) were calculated for each individual. Different treatment end-points were scored, and the overall treatment outcome score was compared with the osteoblastic activity progression as scored with [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text]. RESULTS: [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] were not correlated within each orthopedic group (p > 0.1 for all groups), nor for the pooled population (p = 0.12). The distribution of [Formula: see text] was found significantly different among the different orthopedic groups (p = 0.0046) -also for [Formula: see text] (p = 0.022). The positive and negative treatment predictive values for [Formula: see text] were 66.7 % and 77.8 %, respectively. Corresponding values for [Formula: see text] were 25 % and 33.3 % CONCLUSIONS: The [Formula: see text] obtained from dynamic [18F]-fluoride-PET imaging is a promising predictive factor to evaluate changes in bone healing in response to TSF treatment.
PURPOSE: The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is used to correct orthopedic conditions such as correction osteotomies in delayed fracture healing and pseudarthrosis. Long-term TSF-treatments are common and may lead to complications. Current conventional radiological methods are often unsatisfactory for therapy monitoring. Hence, an imaging technique capable of quantifying bone healing progression would be advantageous. METHODS: A cohort of 24 patients with different orthopedic conditions, pseudarthrosis (n = 10), deformities subjected to correction osteotomy (n = 9), and fracture (n = 5) underwent dynamic [18F]-fluoride (Na18F) PET/CT at 8 weeks and 4 months, respectively, after application of a TSF. Parametric images, corresponding to the net transport rate of [18F]-fluoride from plasma to bone, K i were calculated. The ratio of the maximum K i at PET scan 2 and 1 ([Formula: see text]) as well as the ratio of the maximum Standard Uptake Value at PET scan 2 and 1 ([Formula: see text]) were calculated for each individual. Different treatment end-points were scored, and the overall treatment outcome score was compared with the osteoblastic activity progression as scored with [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text]. RESULTS: [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] were not correlated within each orthopedic group (p > 0.1 for all groups), nor for the pooled population (p = 0.12). The distribution of [Formula: see text] was found significantly different among the different orthopedic groups (p = 0.0046) -also for [Formula: see text] (p = 0.022). The positive and negative treatment predictive values for [Formula: see text] were 66.7 % and 77.8 %, respectively. Corresponding values for [Formula: see text] were 25 % and 33.3 % CONCLUSIONS: The [Formula: see text] obtained from dynamic [18F]-fluoride-PET imaging is a promising predictive factor to evaluate changes in bone healing in response to TSF treatment.
Entities:
Keywords:
Fluoride; Influx rate; PET/CT; Parametric PET imaging; SUV; TSF
Authors: Andreas Bockisch; Thomas Beyer; Gerald Antoch; Lutz S Freudenberg; Hilmar Kühl; Jörg F Debatin; Stefan P Müller Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2004 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: M Piert; T T Zittel; G A Becker; M Jahn; A Stahlschmidt; G Maier; H J Machulla; R Bares Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Robert K Doot; Mark Muzi; Lanell M Peterson; Erin K Schubert; Julie R Gralow; Jennifer M Specht; David A Mankoff Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: R A Hawkins; Y Choi; S C Huang; C K Hoh; M Dahlbom; C Schiepers; N Satyamurthy; J R Barrio; M E Phelps Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1992-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: W K Hsu; B T Feeley; L Krenek; D B Stout; A F Chatziioannou; J R Lieberman Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-03-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: C Messa; W G Goodman; C K Hoh; Y Choi; A R Nissenson; I B Salusky; M E Phelps; R A Hawkins Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1993-10 Impact factor: 5.958