Literature DB >> 15262234

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography--imaging protocols, artifacts, and pitfalls.

Andreas Bockisch1, Thomas Beyer, Gerald Antoch, Lutz S Freudenberg, Hilmar Kühl, Jörg F Debatin, Stefan P Müller.   

Abstract

There has been a longstanding interest in fused images of anatomical information, such as that provided by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems, with biological information obtainable by positron emission tomography (PET). The near-simultaneous data acquisition in a fixed combination of a PET and a CT scanner in a combined PET/CT imaging system minimizes spatial and temporal mismatches between the modalities by eliminating the need to move the patient in between exams. In addition, using the fast CT scan for PET attenuation correction, the duration of the examination is significantly reduced compared to standalone PET imaging with standard rod-transmission sources. The main source of artifacts arises from the use of the CT-data for scatter and attenuation correction of the PET images. Today, CT reconstruction algorithms cannot account for the presence of metal implants, such as dental fillings or prostheses, properly, thus resulting in streak artifacts, which are propagated into the PET image by the attenuation correction. The transformation of attenuation coefficients at X-ray energies to those at 511 keV works well for soft tissues, bone, and air, but again is insufficient for dense CT contrast agents, such as iodine or barium. Finally, mismatches, for example, due to uncoordinated respiration result in incorrect attenuation-corrected PET images. These artifacts, however, can be minimized or avoided prospectively by careful acquisition protocol considerations. In doubt, the uncorrected images almost always allow discrimination between true and artificial finding. PET/CT has to be integrated into the diagnostic workflow for harvesting the full potential of the new modality. In particular, the diagnostic power of both, the CT and the PET within the combination must not be underestimated. By combining multiple diagnostic studies within a single examination, significant logistic advantages can be expected if the combined PET/CT examination is to replace separate state-of-the-art PET and CT exams, thus resulting in significantly accelerated diagnostics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15262234     DOI: 10.1016/j.mibio.2004.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  35 in total

1.  Calcified Lymph Nodes Causing Clinically Relevant Attenuation Correction Artifacts on PET/CT Imaging.

Authors:  Amar Mehta; Ajeet Mehta; Charles Laymon; Todd M Blodgett
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2010-02-01

2.  Imaging of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: (124)I-PET/MRI may not be superior to (124)I-PET/CT.

Authors:  A Vrachimis; M Weckesser; M Schäfers; L Stegger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  [Principles of PET/CT and clinical application].

Authors:  A Bockisch; T Beyer; G Antoch; P Veit; S Müller; R Pink; S Rosenbaum; H Kühl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Putting 'clear' into nuclear medicine: a decade of PET/CT development.

Authors:  Thomas Beyer; David W Townsend
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Direct comparison of [18F]FDG PET/CT with PET alone and with side-by-side PET and CT in patients with malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Felix M Mottaghy; Cord Sunderkötter; Roland Schubert; Petra Wohlfart; Norbert M Blumstein; Bernd Neumaier; Gerhard Glatting; Cueneyt Ozdemir; Andreas K Buck; Karin Scharffetter-Kochanek; Sven N Reske
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques.

Authors:  Matthias Hofmann; Bernd Pichler; Bernhard Schölkopf; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Respiratory-induced errors in tumor quantification and delineation in CT attenuation-corrected PET images: effects of tumor size, tumor location, and respiratory trace: a simulation study using the 4D XCAT phantom.

Authors:  Parham Geramifar; Mojtaba Shamsaie Zafarghandi; Pardis Ghafarian; Arman Rahmim; Mohammad Reza Ay
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 8.  False-positive FDG PET uptake--the role of PET/CT.

Authors:  Sandra J Rosenbaum; Thomas Lind; Gerald Antoch; Andreas Bockisch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Positron emission tomography (PET) attenuation correction artefacts in PET/CT and PET/MRI.

Authors:  C Buchbender; V Hartung-Knemeyer; M Forsting; G Antoch; T A Heusner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  18F-FDG PET/CT evaluation of children and young adults with suspected spinal fusion hardware infection.

Authors:  Brian M Bagrosky; Kari L Hayes; Phillip J Koo; Laura Z Fenton
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.