Literature DB >> 27448021

Micro-dose hCG as luteal phase support without exogenous progesterone administration: mathematical modelling of the hCG concentration in circulation and initial clinical experience.

C Yding Andersen1,2, R Fischer3, V Giorgione4, Thomas W Kelsey5.   

Abstract

For the last two decades, exogenous progesterone administration has been used as luteal phase support (LPS) in connection with controlled ovarian stimulation combined with use of the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger for the final maturation of follicles. The introduction of the GnRHa trigger to induce ovulation showed that exogenous progesterone administration without hCG supplementation was insufficient to obtain satisfactory pregnancy rates. This has prompted development of alternative strategies for LPS. Augmenting the local endogenous production of progesterone by the multiple corpora lutea has been one focus with emphasis on one hand to avoid development of ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome and, on the other hand, to provide adequate levels of progesterone to sustain implantation. The present study evaluates the use of micro-dose hCG for LPS support and examines the potential advances and disadvantages. Based on the pharmacokinetic characteristics of hCG, the mathematical modelling of the concentration profiles of hCG during the luteal phase has been evaluated in connection with several different approaches for hCG administration as LPS. It is suggested that the currently employed LPS provided in connection with the GnRHa trigger (i.e. 1.500 IU) is too strong, and that daily micro-dose hCG administration is likely to provide an optimised LPS with the current available drugs. Initial clinical results with the micro-dose hCG approach are presented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corpus luteum function; GnRH agonist trigger; Luteal phase support; hCG

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27448021      PMCID: PMC5065547          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0764-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  29 in total

Review 1.  Improving the luteal phase after ovarian stimulation: reviewing new options.

Authors:  C Yding Andersen; K Vilbour Andersen
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 2.  GnRH agonist for triggering of final oocyte maturation: time for a change of practice?

Authors:  P Humaidan; S Kol; E G Papanikolaou
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 15.610

3.  Neuroendocrine regulation of the corpus luteum in the human. Evidence for pulsatile progesterone secretion.

Authors:  M Filicori; J P Butler; W F Crowley
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  GnRH agonist (buserelin) or hCG for ovulation induction in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  P Humaidan; H Ejdrup Bredkjaer; L Bungum; M Bungum; M L Grøndahl; L Westergaard; C Yding Andersen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Effect of level of dietary energy and protein on embryo survival and progesterone production on day eight of pregnancy in Rasa Aragonesa ewes.

Authors:  J A Abecia; J M Lozano; F Forcada; L Zarazaga
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.145

Review 6.  Review: hCGs: different sources of production, different glycoforms and functions.

Authors:  T Fournier; J Guibourdenche; D Evain-Brion
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 7.  Identification of the high-risk patient for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Authors:  Evangelos G Papanikolaou; Peter Humaidan; Nikolaos P Polyzos; Basil Tarlatzis
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 1.303

8.  Direct transport of progesterone from vagina to uterus.

Authors:  E Cicinelli; D de Ziegler; C Bulletti; M G Matteo; L M Schonauer; P Galantino
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  GnRHa trigger and individualized luteal phase hCG support according to ovarian response to stimulation: two prospective randomized controlled multi-centre studies in IVF patients.

Authors:  P Humaidan; N P Polyzos; B Alsbjerg; K Erb; A L Mikkelsen; H O Elbaek; E G Papanikolaou; C Y Andersen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  A randomized controlled dose-response pilot study of addition of hCG to recombinant FSH during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  L L Thuesen; A Loft; A N Egeberg; J Smitz; J H Petersen; A Nyboe Andersen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  8 in total

1.  Excellence in assisted reproductive technologies: clinical and laboratory perspectives.

Authors:  Hakan Yarali; Gurkan Bozdag; Lale Karakoc Sokmensuer; Sezcan Mumusoglu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Disparities in reproductive outcomes according to the endometrial preparation protocol in frozen embryo transfer : The risk of early pregnancy loss in frozen embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  I Hatoum; L Bellon; N Swierkowski; M Ouazana; S Bouba; K Fathallah; B Paillusson; M Bailly; F Boitrelle; L Alter; M Bergère; J Selva; R Wainer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Grand Challenges in Reproductive Endocrinology.

Authors:  Claus Yding Andersen
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 5.555

4.  Luteal Coasting and Individualization of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Dose after Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Triggering for Final Oocyte Maturation-A Retrospective Proof-of-Concept Study.

Authors:  Barbara Lawrenz; Suzan Samir; Nicolas Garrido; Laura Melado; Nils Engelmann; Human M Fatemi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 5.  GnRH Agonist Trigger and LH Activity Luteal Phase Support versus hCG Trigger and Conventional Luteal Phase Support in Fresh Embryo Transfer IVF/ICSI Cycles-A Systematic PRISMA Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thor Haahr; Matheus Roque; Sandro C Esteves; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Early stop of progesterone supplementation after confirmation of pregnancy in IVF/ICSI fresh embryo transfer cycles of poor responders does not affect pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Song-Po Pan; Kuang-Han Chao; Chu-Chun Huang; Ming-Yih Wu; Mei-Jou Chen; Chin-Hao Chang; Jehn-Hsiahn Yang; Yu-Shih Yang; Shee-Uan Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Luteal Support with very Low Daily Dose of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin after Fresh Embryo Transfer as an Alternative to Cycle Segmentation for High Responders Patients Undergoing Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist-Triggered IVF.

Authors:  Andrea Roberto Carosso; Stefano Canosa; Gianluca Gennarelli; Marta Sestero; Bernadette Evangelisti; Lorena Charrier; Loredana Bergandi; Chiara Benedetto; Alberto Revelli
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-07

Review 8.  Individualized luteal phase support after fresh embryo transfer: unanswered questions, a review.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Jie Hao; Yanping Li
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.223

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.