Literature DB >> 27447842

The mammary ducts create a favourable microenvironment for xenografting of luminal and molecular apocrine breast tumours.

Elodie Richard1, Thomas Grellety1, Valerie Velasco1, Gaetan MacGrogan1, Hervé Bonnefoi1, Richard Iggo2.   

Abstract

There is a paucity of models for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer because of the difficulty of establishing xenografts from these tumours. We show that this obstacle can be overcome by injecting human tumour cells directly into the mammary ducts of immunodeficient mice. Tumours from 31 patients were infected overnight with a lentiviral vector expressing tdTomato and injected through the nipple into the mammary ducts of NOD-SCID-IL2RG-/- mice. Tumours formed in the mice in 77% of cases after the first injection (6/8 luminal A, 15/20 luminal B, and 3/3 molecular apocrine). Four luminal A and one molecular apocrine graft were tested in secondary and tertiary grafts: all were successfully passaged in secondary and 4/5 in tertiary grafts. None of the samples engrafted when injected subcutaneously. The morphology, oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), androgen receptor (AR), and Ki-67 profiles of the clinical samples were maintained in the tertiary grafts. We also show that the intraductal approach can be used to test the response to targeted therapy with fulvestrant and palbociclib, using a genetically defined ER+ model. We conclude that the mammary ducts create a microenvironment that is uniquely favourable to the survival and growth of tumours derived from mammary hormone-sensing cells. This approach opens the door to testing genomically targeted treatment of HR+ tumours in precision medicine programmes.
Copyright © 2016 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intraductal xenograft; luminal breast cancer; molecular apocrine breast cancer; patient-derived xenograft (PDX)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27447842     DOI: 10.1002/path.4772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  15 in total

1.  Orthotopic Implantation Achieves Better Engraftment and Faster Growth Than Subcutaneous Implantation in Breast Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts.

Authors:  Maiko Okano; Masanori Oshi; Ali Butash; Ichiro Okano; Katsuharu Saito; Tsutomu Kawaguchi; Masayuki Nagahashi; Koji Kono; Toru Ohtake; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  Modeling Breast Cancer in Organoid and Intraductal Models.

Authors:  Richard Iggo
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Patterns of genomic change in residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Aikaterini Chatzipli; Hervé Bonnefoi; Gaetan MacGrogan; Julie Sentis; David Cameron; Coralie Poncet; Richard Iggo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 9.075

Review 4.  Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in basic and translational breast cancer research.

Authors:  Lacey E Dobrolecki; Susie D Airhart; Denis G Alferez; Samuel Aparicio; Fariba Behbod; Mohamed Bentires-Alj; Cathrin Brisken; Carol J Bult; Shirong Cai; Robert B Clarke; Heidi Dowst; Matthew J Ellis; Eva Gonzalez-Suarez; Richard D Iggo; Peter Kabos; Shunqiang Li; Geoffrey J Lindeman; Elisabetta Marangoni; Aaron McCoy; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Helen Piwnica-Worms; Marie-France Poupon; Jorge Reis-Filho; Carol A Sartorius; Valentina Scabia; George Sflomos; Yizheng Tu; François Vaillant; Jane E Visvader; Alana Welm; Max S Wicha; Michael T Lewis
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 9.264

5.  The ninth ENBDC Weggis meeting: growth and in-depth characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast cells.

Authors:  Katrin E Wiese; Romain J Amante; Maria dM Vivanco; Mohamed Bentires-Alj; Richard D Iggo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 6.  In vivo models in breast cancer research: progress, challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Ingunn Holen; Valerie Speirs; Bethny Morrissey; Karen Blyth
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.758

7.  Anti-inflammatory signaling by mammary tumor cells mediates prometastatic macrophage polarization in an innovative intraductal mouse model for triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Jonas Steenbrugge; Koen Breyne; Kristel Demeyere; Olivier De Wever; Niek N Sanders; Wim Van Den Broeck; Cecile Colpaert; Peter Vermeulen; Steven Van Laere; Evelyne Meyer
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08-15

8.  Intraductal patient-derived xenografts of estrogen receptor α-positive breast cancer recapitulate the histopathological spectrum and metastatic potential of human lesions.

Authors:  Maryse Fiche; Valentina Scabia; Patrick Aouad; Laura Battista; Assia Treboux; Athina Stravodimou; Khalil Zaman; Valerian Dormoy; Ayyakkannu Ayyanan; George Sflomos; Cathrin Brisken
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 7.996

9.  Deep Learning Enables Individual Xenograft Cell Classification in Histological Images by Analysis of Contextual Features.

Authors:  Quentin Juppet; Fabio De Martino; Elodie Marcandalli; Martin Weigert; Olivier Burri; Michael Unser; Cathrin Brisken; Daniel Sage
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.673

10.  Growth of human breast cancers in Peromyscus.

Authors:  Vimala Kaza; Elena Farmaki; Amanda Havighorst; Janet Crossland; Ioulia Chatzistamou; Hippokratis Kiaris
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 5.758

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.