| Literature DB >> 27447668 |
Joane Matta1, Lara Nasreddine2, Lamis Jomaa3, Nahla Hwalla4, Abla Mehio Sibai5, Sebastien Czernichow6,7,8, Leila Itani9, Farah Naja10.
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the proportion and socio-demographic correlates of Metabolically Healthy Overweight and Obesity (MHOv/O) among Lebanese adults and to investigate the independent effect of previously identified dietary patterns on odds of MHOv/O. Data were drawn from the National Nutrition and Non-Communicable Disease Risk Factor Survey (Lebanon 2008-2009). Out of the 337 adult participants who had complete socio-demographic, lifestyle, dietary as well as anthropometric and biochemical data, 196 had a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² and their data were included in this study. MHOv/O was identified using the Adult Treatment Panel criteria. Dietary patterns previously derived in this study population were: Fast Food/Dessert, Traditional-Lebanese and High-Protein. The proportion of MHOv/O in the study sample was 37.2%. Females, higher education and high level of physical activity were positively associated with odds of MHOv/O. Subjects with higher adherence to the Traditional-Lebanese pattern had higher odds of MHOv/O (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.09-3.91). No significant associations were observed between the Fast Food/Dessert and the high-protein patterns with MHOv/O. Follow-up studies are needed to confirm those findings and understand the mechanisms by which the Traditional-Lebanese pattern may exert a protective effect in this subgroup of overweight and obese adults.Entities:
Keywords: Lebanese dietary pattern; metabolically healthy obesity; traditional dietary pattern
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27447668 PMCID: PMC4963908 DOI: 10.3390/nu8070432
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Descriptive characteristics of the study population and their association with Metabolically Healthy Overweight and Obesity (MHOv/O), as derived by simple logistic regression (n = 196).
| MUHOv/O ( | MHOv/O ( | OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 42.7 ± 15.7 | 39.2 ± 13.0 | 0.12 | 0.98 (0.96–1.00) |
| Sex | 0.00 | |||
| Males | 81 (66) | 29 (40) | Ref | |
| Females | 42 (34) | 44 (60) | 2.93 (1.61–5.33) | |
| Marital status | 0.93 | |||
| Single | 38 (31) | 23 (32) | Ref | |
| Married | 85 (69) | 50 (68) | 0.97 (0.52–1.81) | |
| Education | 0.06 | |||
| Middle school | 60 (49) | 23 (31) | Ref | |
| High school | 32 (26) | 27 (37) | 1.93 (0.94–3.99) | |
| University & Higher education | 31 (25) | 23 (32) | 2.20 (1.09–4.44) | |
| Family history of obesity | 0.84 | |||
| No | 69 (56) | 42 (57) | Ref | |
| Yes | 54 (44) | 31 (43) | 0.94 (0.523–1.69) | |
| Crowding index | 1.0 ± 0.5 | 1.2 ± 0.5 | 0.10 | 1.56 (0.91–2.66) |
| <1person per room | 52 (43) | 22 (31) | Ref | |
| ≥1 person per room | 70 (57) | 50 (69) | 1.69 (0.91–3.13) | |
| Breakfast per week | 5.0 ± 2.8 | 5.3 ± 2.5 | 0.40 | 1.05 (0.94–1.17) |
| Breakfast Skippers (≤5 times/week) | 44 (36) | 24 (33) | Ref | |
| Breakfast consumers (>5 times/week) | 79 (64) | 49 (67) | 1.14 (0.62–2.10) | |
| Smoking | 0.24 | |||
| No | 83 (67) | 55 (75) | Ref | |
| Yes | 40 (33) | 18 (25) | 0.68 (0.35–1.30) | |
| Physical activity level | 0.00 | |||
| Low | 49 (40) | 18 (25) | Ref | |
| Moderate | 29 (24) | 9 (12) | 0.85 (0.34–2.13) | |
| High | 45 (36) | 46 (63) | 2.78 (1.41–5.49) | |
| Snack per day | 1.5 ± 1.2 | 1.5 ± 0.9 | 0.60 | 0.93 (0.71–1.23) |
| Eating at TV per week | 2.6 ± 3.1 | 2.4 ± 3.2 | 0.57 | 0.97 (0.89–1.07) |
| Eating out per week | 1.5 ± 2.2 | 0.8 ± 1.4 | 0.03 | 0.84 (0.70–1.01) |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 30.2 ± 4.1 | 29.3 ± 3.7 | 0.13 | 0.94 (0.87–1.02) |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 97.4 ± 11.1 | 92.6 ± 10.4 | <0.01 | 0.95 (0.93–0.98) |
| Insulin (μU/mL) | 29.5 ± 22.6 | 21.2 ± 8.3 | <0.01 | 0.95 (0.91–0.98) |
| CRP (mg/dl) | 6.9 ± 9.2 | 5.6 ± 5.6 | 0.29 | 0.985 (0.93–1.02) |
| Percent body fat | 32.0 ± 7.6 | 32.7 ± 6.9 | 0.56 | 1.01 (0.97–1.06) |
Numbers in this table represent mean ± SD for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables. † p-values were derived from chi square test for categorical variables and from independent samples t-test for continuous variables.
Multiple logistic regression for the association between socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics with MHOv/O in the study population (n = 196).
| Demographic and Lifestyle Variables | OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 0.99 (0.97–1.02) |
| Sex | |
| Males | Ref |
| Females | 3.81 (1.95–7.40) ** |
| Education | |
| Middle school | Ref |
| High school | 2.66 (1.19–5.96) * |
| University & Higher education | 2.49 (1.10–5.70) |
| Physical activity level | |
| Low | Ref |
| Moderate | 0.59 (0.22–1.60) |
| High | 2.35 (1.13–4.92) * |
* p-value ≤ 0.05. ** p-value ≤ 0.001.
Crude and adjusted logistic regression models describing the association between the various dietary patterns and MHOv/O in the study population, as derived by logistic regression (n = 196) *,†.
| Crude Model OR; 95% CI | Adjusted Model OR; 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|
| Low adherence | Ref | Ref |
| High adherence | 0.79 (0.43–1.45) | 1.38 (0.66–2.92) |
| Low adherence | Ref | Ref |
| High adherence | 1.29 (0.69–2.40) | 1.83 (1.09–3.91) |
| Low adherence | Ref | Ref |
| High adherence | 1.17(0.63–2.17) | 1.36 (0.69–2.70) |
* Low adherence was defined as belonging to the 1st tertile of the pattern score, while high adherence was defined as belonging to the 2nd and 3rd tertiles. † The adjusted model included sex, education, and physical activity.
Food items/groups constituting the dietary patterns prevalent in the study population *,†.
| Dietary Patterns | ||
|---|---|---|
| Fast Food/Dessert | Traditional-Lebanese | High protein |
| Hamburger (0.76) | Dairy products-full fat (0.58) | Fish (0.70) |
| Shawarma (0.72) | Olives (0.56) | Chicken (0.69) |
| Pizza and pies (0.70) | Fruits and vegetables (0.49) | Meat (0.60) |
| Falafel Sandwiches (0.61) | Legumes (0.47) | Dairy products-low fat (0.54) |
| Desserts (0.41) | Grains (0.47) | Breakfast cereals (0.23) |
| Carbonated beverages and juices (0.4) | Eggs (0.45) | - |
| Mayonnaise (0.35) | Vegetable oil (0.43) | - |
| Butter (0.22) | Nuts and dried fruits (0.40) | - |
| Alcoholic beverages (0.2) | Traditional sweets (0.37) | - |
* Factor loading of the various food groups/items are presented in (). † The dietary patterns and the food items-and their factor loading-making up these patterns were taken from Naja et al. (2013) [29].