Literature DB >> 27447616

Current Stem Cell Biomarkers and Their Functional Mechanisms in Prostate Cancer.

Kaile Zhang1,2, Shukui Zhou3, Leilei Wang4, Jianlong Wang5, Qingsong Zou6, Weixin Zhao7, Qiang Fu8, Xiaolan Fang9.   

Abstract

Currently there is little effective treatment available for castration resistant prostate cancer, which is responsible for the majority of prostate cancer related deaths. Emerging evidence suggested that cancer stem cells might play an important role in resistance to traditional cancer therapies, and the studies of cancer stem cells (including specific isolation and targeting on those cells) might benefit the discovery of novel treatment of prostate cancer, especially castration resistant disease. In this review, we summarized major biomarkers for prostate cancer stem cells, as well as their functional mechanisms and potential application in clinical diagnosis and treatment of patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer stem cell; prostate cancer; stem cell biomarker

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27447616      PMCID: PMC4964535          DOI: 10.3390/ijms17071163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Sci        ISSN: 1422-0067            Impact factor:   5.923


1. Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-skin cancer in American men [1,2]. Standard PCa treatment includes radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and castration (either by drug or by surgery, mainly for androgen sensitive PCa), as well as immunotherapy and palliative therapy (mainly for castration resistant PCa (CRPC)). CRPC is responsible for majority of the PCa-related deaths [3], and currently there are two major hypotheses of CRPC carcinogenesis, the adaptive mechanism and the selective mechanism [4]. The adaptive mechanism suggests gene mutations in PCa cells (e.g., mutations of androgen receptor (AR)), dysregulated expression of genes, etc., contribute to CRPC development [5]. The selective mechanism, which is emerged in the last few decades, suggests that pre-existing castration-resistant subclones in primary PCa tissues and cancer stem cell selection dominates CRPC development (Figure 1) [6,7,8]. Recently, it has been suggested that stem-cell directed differentiation therapy could promote differentiation of cancer stem cells and sensitize them to anticancer drugs (such as synergistic androgen signaling blocking agents) [9].
Figure 1

The mechanism and pathway map of the prostate cancer (modified based on KEGG database). Solid line between genes/molecules indicates direct regulation, while dashed lines indicates possible indirect regulation. Circle indicates a group of similar molecules (instead of a specific one). Biomarkers discussed in this review are highlighted in orange and in bold font, related molecules that are newly discovered are in yellow. Classic biomarkers included in KEGG prostate cancer pathway are highlighted in green. Key regulators in classical pathways involved in PCa are displayed in red (e.g., NKX3.1, PTEN, AR).

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) were defined as cells with capacity of self-renewal and proliferation in cancer tissue [8]. Over years, scientists have been arguing about the origin of cancer stem cells. CSCs were suggested to originate from mutated normal stem cells, from mutated progenitor cells in the process of differentiation which re-gains the characteristics of stem cells, or from mature cells that re-acquired self-renewal ability [10]. Various cell surface markers were used to isolate CSCs, whose proliferative potential was verified by in vitro andin vivo assays (Table 1 and Table 2). This review summarizes recent research progress of current stem cell markers in PCa.
Table 1

Summary of prostate cancer stem cell biomarkers based on location and function.

BiomarkerTransmembrane ProteinGlycoproteinEnzymeTranscription FactorExtracellular ProteinmRNA
IntegrinsYes-----
CD44Yes-----
CD133YesYes----
CD166Yes-----
Trop2YesYes----
CD117Yes-Yes---
ALDH1---Yes--
ABCG2Yes-----
SOX2---Yes--
EZH2--Yes---
cPAcP--Yes---
AR splice variants-----Yes
HGF----Yes-
TGM2--Yes---

Trop2, tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 2; ALDH1, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1; ABCG2, ATP binding membrane transporters; cPAcP, cellular prostatic acid phosphatase; HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; TGM2, transglutaminase II; SOX2, SRY-box 2; EZH2, enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit.

Table 2

Summary of verifying studies and possible pathways of prostate cancer stem cell biomarkers.

MarkersPCa Cell LinesPrimary PCa TissuesMouse ModelsPossible Involved Pathway in PCa
IntegrinsYesYes--
CD44YesYes--
CD133YesYes--
CD166--Yes-
Trop2--Yes-
CD117--Yes-
ALDH1Yes---
ABCG2YesYes--
SOX2-Yes--
EZH2-Yes--
cPAcPYes---
AR splice variantsYes--AR
HGFYes--AR
TGM2Yes--NF-κB

PCa, Prostate cancer.

2. Integrins

Integrins are a family of transmembrane receptors known to participate in cell-cell adhesion and cell-surface mediated signaling, serving as bridges for cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions [11]. Integrin could interact with specific ligands to transfer signals through cell-cell or cell-ECM interactions and stimulate expression of downstream target genes. Integrins were generally overexpressed in PCa [12,13]. In PCa, expression of α2-integrin and EZH2 is observed in a small fraction of cancer cells, which is supportive for their role as stem cell marker [14]. α2β1 integrin plays an important role in epithelia-stroma interaction, which is suggested to contribute to selective bone metastasis [12]. In the meantime, it could be a new marker to screen for prostate stem cells. Collins et al. [15] has discovered that the prostate stem cells expressing α2β1 integrin locate at basal epithelial layer. Approximately 1% of basal cells examined by confocal microscopy were integrin positive, and these cells could be isolated directly from the tissue on the basis of rapid adhesion to type I collagen. This isolated cell population displays basal cell phenotype, marked by expression of CK5 and CK14 and lack of expression of differentiation-specific markers (such as prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP)). These prostate stem cells could be cultivated in vitro and display much greater capability to form colonies in vitro (comparing to total basal cell population). When α2β1 overexpressing cells and stromal cells were transplanted subcutaneously into nude mouse, they could form structure of normal prostate gland prostate-specific differentiation [15]. Microarray experiments performed by several independent groups found that Integrin-α6 (also known as CD49f) is consistently overexpressed in hematopoietic, neural, and embryonic stem cells, and it is suggested as an effective cell stemness marker [16]. It has been used for characterization of prostatic progenitor cells [17,18], and was suggested as an emerging biomarker for PCa evaluation [14,19,20].

3. CD44

CD44 is a single-pass type I transmembrane protein and an important cellular adhesion molecule related to signaling to extracellular matrix. CD44 was considered as a marker of cancer stem cells from many organs including prostate [21,22,23]. It was located extensively on cell membrane and is important for cell adhesion and signal transduction. It was reported that CD44 positive cells from primary prostatic tumor tissues possess cell stemness [24]. Molecular studies demonstrated that CD44+ PCa cells retain certain intrinsic properties of progenitor cells [25]. CD44+ cells express high levels of stemness genes including Oct-3/4, Bmi, β-catenin and Smoothened (SMO) [2,26,27]. Kasper et al. discovered that in PCa cells (such as LNCaP, DU145 and PC3), CD44 positive cells had much greater proliferative capability than CD44 negative cells [28]. Van et al. isolated the DU145 cells from CD44+ and CD44− Cells and tested the gene expression of stem cells by RT-PCR. Low expression of luminal cell markers (e.g., CK18) and AR were observed in CD44+ cells, whereas the genes highly related to stem cell proliferation and differentiation were overexpressed [29]. Recently, CD44 expression level was reported to be correlated with PCa grade in prostate biopsy samples [30], and proteomics analysis showed that CD44+ cells had positive correlation with genes related to cancer proliferation and metastasis [31]. However, Ugolkov discovered that expression of CD44 and Oct4 were observed in large populations of benign and malignant cells in the prostate, which is somewhat contradictory to the definition of stem cells as a small fraction of the total cell population [32]. Their results suggested that combined expression of embryonic stem cell markers EZH2 and SOX2 might be used to identify potential cancer stem cells as a minor (<10%) subgroup in CD44+ prostatic adenocarcinoma cells [32]. Recently, quite a few thorough analyses have been done on CD44 isoforms that are generated through alternative splicing of CD44 precursor mRNA. Those CD44 variants function distinctly in PCa and might serve as independent markers comparing to total CD44 expression level. For example, CD44v2 correlated with a better recurrence-free survival rate in PCa patients and is underexpressed in metastatic PCa cell lines [33]. Another well-studied isoform is CD44v6, which is associated with PCa proliferation, invasion, adhesion, metastasis, chemo-/radioresistance, and the induction of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) as well as the activation PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Wnt signaling pathways, and CD44v6 expression was closely associated with conventional prognostic factors and is identified as significant predictor for biochemical recurrence in PCa [34,35]. CD44v7–10 were overexpressed in PCa, and knock-down of CD44v7–10 by RNAi would significantly decrease invasion and migration in PCa cells [36]. Taken together, those results demonstrated CD44 RNA isoforms, but not total CD44 protein, might serve as specific marker for prostate cancer stem cells, though total CD44 protein level might still serve as a stem cell marker for other types of cancers [29].

4. CD133

CD133 is a glycoprotein with five transmembrane domains, generally expressed in various stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells but not in mature endothelial cells [37]. CD133 has been widely used, usually in combination with other stem cell markers such as CD44 and α2β1 integrin, to isolate cancer stem cells from prostate tumors with different Gleason grade, including cells from both primary and metastatic lesions [38,39,40,41]. Approximately 0.1% of cells in any prostate tumor displayed this phenotype, though there was no correlation between the number of CD44+/α2β1hi/CD133+ cells and tumor grade [23]. In normal prostate tissues, CD133 expression was observed in both basal and luminal cells [42]. Although its expression in normal prostate tissue is pretty low, CD133 is usually overexpressed in inflammation cell population [43]. Prostatic basal cells could be enriched based on α2β1 integrin (hi) expression and further enriched for stem cells using CD133 in non-tumorigenic BPH-1 cells [44]. It is demonstrated that the tumorigenic potential did not reside in the CD133+ stem cells but was consistently observed in the CD133− population [45]. These data confirmed that benign basal cells include cells of origin of prostate cancer and suggested that proliferative CD133− basal cells are more susceptible to tumorigenesis compared to the CD133+-enriched stem cells. These findings challenged the current dogma that normal stem cells and cells of origin of cancer are the same cell type(s) [45]. Intensive studies need to be done to learn more about the role of CD133 in PCa origination.

5. ALDH1

ALDH1 was suggested as a stem cell marker for both normal and tumor tissues [46]. As a cytoplasmic enzyme, ALDH1 has multiple intracellular aldehydes which can be converted into carboxylic acids, and could be involved in intracellular degradation of cell toxic substances [47]. ALDH1 expression was reported to be correlated with tumor grade and prognosis in PCa patients [48]. Burger et al. [49] found that cells with high ALDH enzymatic activity have greater in vitro proliferative potential than cells with low ALDH activity. Similar results were observed in an in vivo prostate reconstitution assay [49]. Thus, ALDH enzymatic activity might be used as a functional marker of prostate stem/progenitor cells and allow for simple, efficient isolation of cells with primitive features. ALDH α2+/α6+/αV + CD44+ cells also displayed high colonization in vitro and highly invasive tumorigenesis and aggressive metastasis characteristics in vivo [50]. p63 cytoplasmic aberrance is associated with high ALDH1A1 expression, and it was found that cytoplasmic p63 levels were significantly associated with the frequency of proliferating cells and cells undergoing apoptosis in prostate cancers [51]. These components are suggested to have an important role in prostate cancer progression and may be used as a panel of molecular markers [52]. The aldehyde dehydrogenase enzymes are likely to protect stem cells by detoxification of cell toxic compounds, which indicates that ALDH1 might prevent prostate cancer stem cells from conventional chemotherapy attack, while effective inhibition of ALDH1 could enhance the chemotherapy efficiency. Thus, ALDH1 could not only be used as a prostate cancer stem cell marker for prognosis, but also as a potential drug target in cancer treatment.

6. ATP Binding Membrane Transporters (ABCG2, Also Known as Breast Cancer Resistant Protein or BCRP)

Studies have shown that prostate cancer contains side population cells (SP cells), which could be isolated by flow cytometry techniques based on behavioral characteristics of stem cells. SP cells have stem cell properties that are exclusively mediated by ABCG2. As a result, ABCG2 is considered as a marker of SP cells, as well as a cancer stem cell marker. ABCG2 is ATP binding membrane transporters, and is related to prostate cancer multi-drug resistance [10]. After castration, ABCG2+/ARprostate cancer stem cells could be isolated from prostate cancer tissues, and it is suggested that ABCG2 expression might protect prostate cancer stem cells from castration, chemotherapy and hypoxic environment. ABCG2 has been suggested as a biomarker for treatments targeting on prostate cancer stem cells [53]. Interestingly, Patrswala et al. [54] found that ABCG2(+) cells could produce ABCG2(−) cells, and both types of cells have similar tumorigenicity and colony formation ability. 30% of human cancer cell lines (and more in the bone marrow) and xenografts contain 0.04% to 0.20% of SP cells (low but detectable), yet most of the primary tumor cells have only a very small portion of the SP cells, almost impossible to detect [55,56]. Giving the evidence that non-recurrent PCa samples presented relatively lower level of ABCG2, compared to both normal tissue and recurrent samples, it might be associated with chemo-sensitivity [57]. Whether ABCG2 could be used as a specific biomarker in PCa diagnosis and prognosis is still unclear and requires further research.

7. SOX2 and EZH2

SOX2 and EZH2 are essential for the development of human embryonic stem cells. SOX2 is a transcription factor and plays a key role in maintaining undifferentiated status and keeping self-renewal ability of embryonic stem cells [58]. EZH2 is critical for embryonic stem cells rebuilding and embryonic development. Studies show that they play a key role in prostate cancer stem cells [32]. Recently, SOX2 and EZH2 are also suggested as markers in malignant glioma patients [59]. Ugolkov et al. [32] analyzed expression of CD44, CD133, Oct4, SOX2 and EZH2 in benign prostate tissues, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and PCa tissues, and found that EZH2 and SOX2 were expressed in <10% of benign prostate tissue, HGPINs and prostate cancer. In addition, 82% (27/33) of SOX2+ prostate cancer cases were EZH2+ type, and 100% (33/33) of cases were CD44+. On the other hand, CD44 was found in 97% of benign prostate and HGPIN cases, and in 72% of prostate cancer cases. CD133 was found in only a small portion of PCa tissues (6%, 4/67). Oct4 expression was found to be closely correlated with benign and HGPIN, but not with PCa. It is believed that CD44 and Oct4 were expressed in most of benign and malignant prostate cells, which is not likely to be representative for a very small proportion of cancer cells (such as cancer stem cells).

8. CD166

CD166 is a newly discovered molecular surface marker of prostate cancer stem cells [60]. CD166 belongs to the Ig family of type I transmembrane proteins, which mediate cell-cell interactions, and have been used as prognostic markers for a variety of cancers [1]. CD166 was reported to enrich sphere-forming activity of WT LSC (hi) and Pten null LSC (hi), and enhance the sphere-forming ability of benign primary human prostate cells in vitro and induce the formation of tubule-like structures in vivo [60]. CD166 could be used to identify and isolate human, murine prostate cancer stem cells and hormone refractory prostate cancer [61]. CD166 protein level is upregulated in human PCa, especially in CRPC patients. Although genetic deletion of murine CD166 in the Pten null PCa model does not interfere with sphere formation or block prostate cancer progression and CRPC development, the presence of CD166 on prostate stem/progenitors and castration resistant sub-population of cells suggest that it could be a surface marker of cell stemness. It could be a potential therapeutic target for prostate cancer therapies, as reduced expression of CD166 might be able to interfere or reverse prostate cancer metastasis.

9. cPAcP

cPAcP is a prostate specific differentiation antigen. In PCa cells, decreased cPAcP expression is associated with androgen-independent cell proliferation and tumorigenicity as seen in advanced hormone-refractory prostate carcinomas [62]. It was demonstrated that HDAC inhibitor treatment could result in increased cPAcP protein level in cPAcP positive cells, increase androgen responsiveness, and exhibit higher inhibitory activities on AR/cPAcP-positive PCa cells than on AR/cPAcP-negative PCa cells. These data indicate that cPAcP has potential clinical importance serving as a useful biomarker in the identification of PCa patient sub-population suitable for HDAC inhibitor treatment [63,64].

10. Hepatocyte Growth Factor

It was found that prostate cancer stem-like cells (CSCs)/cancer initiating cells (CICs) express hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and that the HGF/c-MET proto-oncogene product (c-MET) signal has a role in the maintenance of prostate CSCs/CICs in an autocrine fashion. Immunohistochemical staining of HGF was compared to biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy, and patients with PCa tumors exhibiting HGF positivity of 5% or more had a significantly shorter biochemical recurrence-free period than that of patients whose tumor HGF positivity was less than 5% (p = 0.001). In multivariate Cox regression, preoperative PSA and HGF positivity had the potential to be independent predictors of biochemical recurrence following prostatectomy [65].

11. Tumor-Associated Calcium Signal Transducer 2

Tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 2 (also known as Trop2) is a type I membrane glycoprotein which transduces intracellular calcium signal and acts as a cell surface receptor [66,67]. Trop2 is highly expressed in epithelial related cancers, and its protein level often correlates with poor prognosis [68,69,70,71,72,73]. Trop2 positive cells could be identified as a subpopulation of prostate basal cells with stem cell characteristics, and it has been used as an effective marker for isolation of basal prostate progenitor cells [74,75,76]. In prostate cancer, scientists discovered that Trop2 regulate cancer cell proliferation, self-renewal, cell-cell adhesion and metastasis through β-catenin and β1-integrin signaling pathways [77,78,79]. Interestingly, Trop2 expression in prostate cancer cells was regulated by energy restriction, glucose deprivation and methylation [80,81,82], making it a potential drug target in cancer treatment. Moreover, anti-Trop2 bispecific antibody was approved to effectively lead pre-targeted immunoPET and radioimmunotherapy of PCa in preclinical models, which significantly increased PCa related survival [83,84].

12. CD117

CD117 (also known as c-Kit) is a receptor tyrosine kinase protein, and has been used as an important cell surface marker to identify hematopoietic progenitors in bone marrow [85,86,87]. CD117 overexpression was observed in several types of solid tumors including prostate [88,89], and is correlated with the capacity of cell self-renewal and cancer progression [90,91]. Circulating CD117 positive cell percentage is correlated with cancer progression and PSA values in advanced PCa [92]. CD117 could be activated by its ligand, Stem Cell Factor (SCF), to promote bone marrow cell migration, tumor dissemination and potential bone metastasis [91,92,93,94].

13. AR Splice Variants

AR splice variants were found to promote EMT as well as induce the expression of stem cell signature genes [95]. Over 10 different AR splice variants were discovered in PCa cell lines, PCa xenografts and human patient samples, and a few of them were dissected to understand their functions in cancer progression [96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103]. More importantly, AR splice variants, such as AR-V7, were suggested to contribute to the drug resistance after suppression of AR signaling, especially in CRPCs [104,105]. High level of AR-V7 was observed in CRPC specimen, but rarely in hormone-naïve specimen [102]. It was suggested that transition from negative to positive status of AR-V7 might reflect the selective pressures on tumor, which makes it a dynamic marker for PCa diagnosis based on liquid biopsy samples, such as circulating tumor cells (CTC) [106].

14. TGM2

Transglutaminases are enzymes that catalyze the crosslinking of proteins by epsilon-γ glutamyl lysine isopeptide bonds. While the primary structure of transglutaminases is not conserved, they all have the same amino acid sequence at their active sites and their activity is calcium-dependent. The protein encoded by this gene acts as a monomer, is induced by retinoic acid, and appears to be involved in apoptosis. TGM2 expression is shown to negatively regulate AR expression and to attenuate androgen sensitivity of prostate cancer cells [107]. TGM2 activation of NF-κB expression induces NF-κB binding to DNA elements in the AR gene to reduce AR gene expression, and triggers epithelial–mesenchymal transition [107]. This suggests that TGM2-regulated inflammatory signaling may contribute to the androgen dependence of prostate cancer cells [107]. Thus, TGM2 is concluded as a cancer stem cell survival factor in various types of cancers, including prostate cancer [108].

15. Conclusions

Studies of prostate cancer stem cells have gained much progress in the past few years and numerous potential approaches were discussed for novel PCa treatment [109,110]. This review summarizes the major intracellular PCa stem cell biomarkers, including a few novel markers discovered recently. The normal or pathological process and potential drug response reflected by those biomarkers were discussed, which might help with early diagnosis, prevention, drug target identification, drug response evaluation and so on. With the progress in study of circulating biomarkers, we expect that more candidates would be identified to facilitate PCa biopsies, especially those soluble markers (circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor nucleic acid (ctNAs), miRNA, lncRNA, exosomes, etc.) for liquid biopsies.
  110 in total

1.  A receptor tyrosine kinase specific to hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell-enriched populations.

Authors:  W Matthews; C T Jordan; G W Wiegand; D Pardoll; I R Lemischka
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-06-28       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Human prostatic acid phosphatase, an authentic tyrosine phosphatase, dephosphorylates ErbB-2 and regulates prostate cancer cell growth.

Authors:  Tsai-Der Chuang; Siu-Ju Chen; Fen-Fen Lin; Suresh Veeramani; Satyendra Kumar; Surinder K Batra; Yaping Tu; Ming-Fong Lin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Genomic analysis of prostate cancer stem cells isolated from a highly metastatic cell line.

Authors:  Rebecca A Rowehl; Howard Crawford; Antoine Dufour; Jingfang Ju; Galina I Botchkina
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.069

4.  Differential expression of stem cell markers and ABCG2 in recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Esra Guzel; Omer F Karatas; Mehmet B Duz; Mustafa Solak; Michael Ittmann; Mustafa Ozen
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  Expression of CD44 in prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  A Y Liu
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Cloning of the gene encoding Trop-2, a cell-surface glycoprotein expressed by human carcinomas.

Authors:  M Fornaro; R Dell'Arciprete; M Stella; C Bucci; M Nutini; M G Capri; S Alberti
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1995-09-04       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy of Prostate Cancer with an Anti-TROP-2×Anti-HSG Bispecific Antibody and a (177)Lu-Labeled Peptide.

Authors:  Catharina M van Rij; Cathelijne Frielink; David M Goldenberg; Robert M Sharkey; Susanne Lütje; William J McBride; Wim J G Oyen; Otto C Boerman
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.099

8.  Identification and isolation of human prostate epithelial stem cells based on alpha(2)beta(1)-integrin expression.

Authors:  A T Collins; F K Habib; N J Maitland; D E Neal
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  ALDH1A1 is a marker for malignant prostate stem cells and predictor of prostate cancer patients' outcome.

Authors:  Ting Li; Yun Su; Yuping Mei; Qixin Leng; Bingjie Leng; Zhenqiu Liu; Sanford A Stass; Feng Jiang
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 5.662

10.  Enrichment of prostate cancer stem-like cells from human prostate cancer cell lines by culture in serum-free medium and chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Xing Huang; Xinmin Zheng; Xinghuan Wang; Shiwen Li; Lin Zhang; Zhonghua Yang; Zhiping Xia
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 6.580

View more
  7 in total

1.  Constant Degradation of the Androgen Receptor by MDM2 Conserves Prostate Cancer Stem Cell Integrity.

Authors:  Premkumar Vummidi Giridhar; Karin Williams; Andrew P VonHandorf; Paul L Deford; Susan Kasper
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  Role of prostate cancer stem-like cells in the development of antiandrogen resistance.

Authors:  Prem Prakash Kushwaha; Shiv Verma; Shashank Kumar; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  Cancer Drug Resist       Date:  2022-06-01

Review 3.  Recent Advances in Cancer Stem Cell-Targeted Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Narayanasamy Badrinath; So Young Yoo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  The driver role of JAK-STAT signalling in cancer stemness capabilities leading to new therapeutic strategies for therapy- and castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  U-Ging Lo; Yu-An Chen; Junjie Cen; Su Deng; Junghang Luo; Haiyen Zhau; Lin Ho; Chih-Ho Lai; Ping Mu; Leland W K Chung; Jer-Tsong Hsieh
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2022-08

5.  5-Aminolevulinic acid overcomes hypoxia-induced radiation resistance by enhancing mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production in prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Takuya Owari; Nobumichi Tanaka; Yasushi Nakai; Makito Miyake; Satoshi Anai; Shingo Kishi; Shiori Mori; Rina Fujiwara-Tani; Yudai Hojo; Takuya Mori; Masaomi Kuwada; Tomomi Fujii; Masatoshi Hasegawa; Kiyohide Fujimoto; Hiroki Kuniyasu
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 9.075

6.  Advances in Biomarkers for PCa Diagnostics and Prognostics-A Way towards Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Carsten Stephan; Klaus Jung
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Epidermal Growth Factor Is Essential for the Maintenance of Novel Prostate Epithelial Cells Isolated From Patient-Derived Organoids.

Authors:  Katia Cheaito; Hisham F Bahmad; Hiba Jalloul; Ola Hadadeh; Hiba Msheik; Albert El-Hajj; Deborah Mukherji; Mohamed Al-Sayegh; Wassim Abou-Kheir
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-10-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.