Literature DB >> 27447442

Development of West-European PM2.5 and NO2 land use regression models incorporating satellite-derived and chemical transport modelling data.

Kees de Hoogh1, John Gulliver2, Aaron van Donkelaar3, Randall V Martin4, Julian D Marshall5, Matthew J Bechle6, Giulia Cesaroni7, Marta Cirach Pradas8, Audrius Dedele9, Marloes Eeftens10, Bertil Forsberg11, Claudia Galassi12, Joachim Heinrich13, Barbara Hoffmann14, Bénédicte Jacquemin15, Klea Katsouyanni16, Michal Korek17, Nino Künzli18, Sarah J Lindley19, Johanna Lepeule20, Frederik Meleux21, Audrey de Nazelle22, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen23, Wenche Nystad24, Ole Raaschou-Nielsen25, Annette Peters26, Vincent-Henri Peuch27, Laurence Rouil28, Orsolya Udvardy29, Rémy Slama30, Morgane Stempfelet31, Euripides G Stephanou32, Ming Y Tsai33, Tarja Yli-Tuomi34, Gudrun Weinmayr35, Bert Brunekreef36, Danielle Vienneau37, Gerard Hoek38.   

Abstract

Satellite-derived (SAT) and chemical transport model (CTM) estimates of PM2.5 and NO2 are increasingly used in combination with Land Use Regression (LUR) models. We aimed to compare the contribution of SAT and CTM data to the performance of LUR PM2.5 and NO2 models for Europe. Four sets of models, all including local traffic and land use variables, were compared (LUR without SAT or CTM, with SAT only, with CTM only, and with both SAT and CTM). LUR models were developed using two monitoring data sets: PM2.5 and NO2 ground level measurements from the European Study of Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects (ESCAPE) and from the European AIRBASE network. LUR PM2.5 models including SAT and SAT+CTM explained ~60% of spatial variation in measured PM2.5 concentrations, substantially more than the LUR model without SAT and CTM (adjR2: 0.33-0.38). For NO2 CTM improved prediction modestly (adjR2: 0.58) compared to models without SAT and CTM (adjR2: 0.47-0.51). Both monitoring networks are capable of producing models explaining the spatial variance over a large study area. SAT and CTM estimates of PM2.5 and NO2 significantly improved the performance of high spatial resolution LUR models at the European scale for use in large epidemiological studies.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution; Exposure; Fine particulate matter; Nitrogen dioxide; Spatial modelling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27447442     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  24 in total

Review 1.  Incorporating Measurement Error from Modeled Air Pollution Exposures into Epidemiological Analyses.

Authors:  Evangelia Samoli; Barbara K Butland
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-12

2.  Assessing NO2 Concentration and Model Uncertainty with High Spatiotemporal Resolution across the Contiguous United States Using Ensemble Model Averaging.

Authors:  Qian Di; Heresh Amini; Liuhua Shi; Itai Kloog; Rachel Silvern; James Kelly; M Benjamin Sabath; Christine Choirat; Petros Koutrakis; Alexei Lyapustin; Yujie Wang; Loretta J Mickley; Joel Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Global Land Use Regression Model for Nitrogen Dioxide Air Pollution.

Authors:  Andrew Larkin; Jeffrey A Geddes; Randall V Martin; Qingyang Xiao; Yang Liu; Julian D Marshall; Michael Brauer; Perry Hystad
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and bladder cancer incidence in a pooled European cohort: the ELAPSE project.

Authors:  Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Gerard Hoek; Jie Chen; Sophia Rodopoulou; Maciej Strak; Kees de Hoogh; Tahir Taj; Aslak Harbo Poulsen; Zorana J Andersen; Tom Bellander; Jørgen Brandt; Emanuel Zitt; Daniela Fecht; Francesco Forastiere; John Gulliver; Ole Hertel; Barbara Hoffmann; Ulla Arthur Hvidtfeldt; W M Monique Verschuren; Jeanette T Jørgensen; Klea Katsouyanni; Matthias Ketzel; Anton Lager; Karin Leander; Shuo Liu; Petter Ljungman; Gianluca Severi; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Patrik K E Magnusson; Gabriele Nagel; Göran Pershagen; Annette Peters; Debora Rizzuto; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Evangelia Samoli; Mette Sørensen; Massimo Stafoggia; Anne Tjønneland; Gudrun Weinmayr; Kathrin Wolf; Bert Brunekreef
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 9.075

5.  Modeling spatial variation of gaseous air pollutants and particulate matters in a Metropolitan area using mobile monitoring data.

Authors:  Jia Xu; Wen Yang; Zhipeng Bai; Renyi Zhang; Jun Zheng; Meng Wang; Tong Zhu
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 8.431

Review 6.  Methods for Assessing Long-Term Exposures to Outdoor Air Pollutants.

Authors:  Gerard Hoek
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-12

7.  An Italian Network of Population-Based Birth Cohorts to Evaluate Social and Environmental Risk Factors on Pregnancy Outcomes: The LEAP Study.

Authors:  Teresa Spadea; Barbara Pacelli; Andrea Ranzi; Claudia Galassi; Raffaella Rusciani; Moreno Demaria; Nicola Caranci; Paola Michelozzi; Francesco Cerza; Marina Davoli; Francesco Forastiere; Giulia Cesaroni
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Annual and seasonal spatial models for nitrogen oxides in Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  Heresh Amini; Seyed-Mahmood Taghavi-Shahri; Sarah B Henderson; Vahid Hosseini; Hossein Hassankhany; Maryam Naderi; Solmaz Ahadi; Christian Schindler; Nino Künzli; Masud Yunesian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  EXPOsOMICS: final policy workshop and stakeholder consultation.

Authors:  Michelle C Turner; Paolo Vineis; Eduardo Seleiro; Michaela Dijmarescu; David Balshaw; Roberto Bertollini; Marc Chadeau-Hyam; Timothy Gant; John Gulliver; Ayoung Jeong; Soterios Kyrtopoulos; Marco Martuzzi; Gary W Miller; Timothy Nawrot; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; David H Phillips; Nicole Probst-Hensch; Jonathan Samet; Roel Vermeulen; Jelle Vlaanderen; Martine Vrijheid; Christopher Wild; Manolis Kogevinas
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Estimating the costs of air pollution to the National Health Service and social care: An assessment and forecast up to 2035.

Authors:  Laura Pimpin; Lise Retat; Daniela Fecht; Laure de Preux; Franco Sassi; John Gulliver; Annalisa Belloni; Brian Ferguson; Emily Corbould; Abbygail Jaccard; Laura Webber
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.