| Literature DB >> 27446818 |
Petrus L B Madeira1, Letícia T Carvalho1, Marco A B Paschoal1, Eduardo M de Sousa2, Eduardo B Moffa1, Marcos A Dos Santos da Silva1, Rudys de Jesus Rodolfo Tavarez1, Letícia M Gonçalves1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether immersion of a denture surface in lemongrass extract (LGE) has effects on C. albicans biofilms, human cell viability and denture surface. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal fungicidal concentration (MFC) were performed for LGE against C. albicans. For biofilm analysis, discs were fabricated using a denture acrylic resin with surface roughness standardization. C. albicans biofilms were developed on saliva-coated discs, and the effects of LGE at MIC, 5XMIC, and 10XMIC were investigated during biofilm formation and after biofilm maturation. Biofilms were investigated for cell counting, metabolic activity, and microscopic analysis. The cytotoxicity of different concentrations of LGE to peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was analyzed using MTT. The effects of LGE on acrylic resin were verified by measuring changes in roughness, color and flexural strength after 28 days of immersion. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, followed by a Tukey test at a 5% significance level. The minimal concentration of LGE required to inhibit C. albicans growth was 0.625 mg/mL, while MFC was 2.5 mg/mL. The presence of LGE during biofilm development resulted in a reduction of cell counting (p < 0.05), which made the MIC sufficient to reduce approximately 90% of cells (p < 0.0001). The exposure of LGE after biofilm maturation also had a significant antifungal effect at all concentrations (p < 0.05). When compared to the control group, the exposure of PBMC to LGE at MIC resulted in similar viability (p > 0.05). There were no verified differences in color perception, roughness, or flexural strength after immersion in LGE at MIC compared to the control (p > 0.05). It could be concluded that immersion of the denture surface in LGE was effective in reducing C. albicans biofilms with no deleterious effects on acrylic properties at MIC. MIC was also an effective and safe concentration for use.Entities:
Keywords: C. albicans; biofilm; human cells; lemongrass extract
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27446818 PMCID: PMC4923188 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Effect of LGE on Number of cell counts when LGE was daily added to the fresh culture medium at different concentrations (MIC, 5XMIC, or 10XMIC) during 72 h biofilms formation; (B) Number of cell counts of a 72 h biofilm immersed for 8 h at different concentrations LGE (MIC, 5XMIC, or 10XMIC); (C) Metabolic activity of biofilms when mature biofilms were exposed to LGE. Different upper case letters represents statistically significant differences between groups (ANOVA one-way followed by Tukey test, p < 0.05).
Figure 2Representative microscope images of mature . The combined use of SYTO-9 and propidium iodide effectively labeled both live and dead yeast cells under different experimental conditions: distilled water (A), LEG at MIC (B) or LEG at 5XMIC (C). Images showed that mature biofilms exposed to LGE tended to be less densely celled (B,C) than the control group (A). Immersion in LGE at MIC (B) and 5XMIC (B) resulted in a large number of dead cells as well as a large number of black spaces, indicating the dispersion of biofilms.
Figure 3PBMC cells viability after exposure to different LGE concentrations. Different upper case letters represents statistically significant differences between groups (ANOVA one-way followed by Tukey test, p < 0.05).
Degree of color difference (ρE) of the acrylic surface after LGE exposure in different periods of time (.
| Distilled water | 3.24 ± 1.41 (A,a) | 3.33 ± 1.82 (A,a) | 3.25 ± 1.52 (A,a) | 3.22 ± 0.71 (A,a) |
| LEG at MIC | 3.36 ± 0.54 (A,a) | 3.05 ± 1.53 (A,a) | 3.15 ± 1.86 (A,a) | 3.25 ± 1.05 (A,a) |
| LEG at 5XMIC | 3.26 ± 1.38 (A,a) | 3.76 ± 0.97 (B,b) | 3.88 ± 0.27 (B,b) | 4.05 ± 0.61 (B,b) |
Different upper case letters indicate statistical significant differences between immersion solutions. Different lower case letters indicate statistical significant differences between immersion periods (ANOVA two-way for repeated measures followed by Tukey test, p < 0.05).
Figure 4Analysis of acrylic resin properties after immersion in LGE at different concentrations. (A) Surface roughness and (B) flexural strength after immersion in LGE at different time-points. There were no statistical differences between groups or periods of immersion (ANOVA two-way followed by Tukey test, p < 0.05).