| Literature DB >> 27445999 |
Elisa Salvetti1, Stefano Campanaro2, Ilenia Campedelli1, Fabio Fracchetti3, Alex Gobbi1, Giovanni Battista Tornielli1, Sandra Torriani1, Giovanna E Felis1.
Abstract
Vitis vinifera L. cv. Corvina grape forms the basis for the production of unique wines, such as Amarone, whose distinctive sensory features are strongly linked to the post-harvest grape withering process. Indeed, this process increases sugar concentration and changes must characteristics. While microorganisms involved in must fermentation have been widely investigated, few data are available on the microbiota of withered grapes. Thus, in this paper, a whole metagenome sequencing (WMS) approach was used to analyse the microbial consortium associated with Corvina berries at the end of the withering process performed in two different conditions ("traditional withering," TW or "accelerated withering," AW), and to unveil whether changes of drying parameters could have an impact on microbial diversity. Samples of healthy undamaged berries were collected and washed, to recover microorganisms from the surface and avoid contamination with grapevine genetic material. Isolated DNA was sequenced and the data obtained were analyzed with several bioinformatics methods. The eukaryotic community was mainly composed by members of the phylum Ascomycota, including Eurotiomycetes, Sordariomycetes, and Dothideomycetes. Moreover, the distribution of the genera Aspergillus and Penicillium (class Eurotiomycetes) varied between the withered berry samples. Instead, Botryotinia, Saccharomyces, and other wine technologically useful microorganisms were relatively scarce in both samples. For prokaryotes, 25 phyla were identified, nine of which were common to both conditions. Environmental bacteria belonging to the class Gammaproteobacteria were dominant and, in particular, the TW sample was characterized by members of the family Pseudomonadaceae, while members of the family Enterobacteriaceae dominated the AW sample, in addition to Sphyngobacteria and Clostridia. Finally, the binning procedure discovered 15 putative genomes which dominated the microbial community of the two samples, and included representatives of genera Erwinia, Pantoea, Pseudomonas, Clostridium, Paenibacillus, and of orders Lactobacillales and Actinomycetales. These results provide insights into the microbial consortium of Corvina withered berries and reveal relevant variations attributable to post-harvest withering conditions, underling how WMS could open novel perspectives in the knowledge and management of the withering process of Corvina, with an impact on the winemaking of important Italian wines.Entities:
Keywords: bacteria; metagenomics; microbial diversity; microbiome; molds; post-harvest; withered grape; yeasts
Year: 2016 PMID: 27445999 PMCID: PMC4917526 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00937
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Coverage of the functional categories found in the two metagenomic datasets. A, RNA processing and modification; B, chromatin structure and dynamics; C, energy production and conversion; D, cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning; E, amino acid transport and metabolism; F, nucleotide transport and metabolism; G, carbohydrate transport and metabolism; H, coenzyme transport and metabolism; I, lipid transport and metabolism; J, translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis; K, transcription; L, replication, recombination, and repair; M, cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; N, cell motility; O, post-translational modification, protein turnover, and chaperones; P, inorganic ion transport and metabolism; Q, secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism; R, general function prediction only; S, function unknown; T, signal transduction mechanisms; U, intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; V, defense mechanisms; W, extracellular structures; Y, nuclear structure; Z, cytoskeleton.
Figure 2The ecological diversity of the eukaryotic population of traditional (A-TW) and accelerated (B-AW) withered berry samples estimated using MG-RAST software based on 2 million reads selected from each samples querying the NCBI .
Figure 3The composition of the Ascomycota population of traditional (A-TW) and accelerated (B-AW) withered berry samples estimated using MG-RAST software based on 2 million reads selected from each samples querying the NCBI .
Relative abundance of prokaryotic phyla associated with grape surfaces of the traditional and accelerated withering process obtained through the MetaPhlAn analyses.
| k__Bacteria;p__Proteobacteria | 97.6583 | 86.0501 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Bacteroidetes | 1.2162 | 4.7371 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Actinobacteria | 0.7383 | 0.0179 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Chlamydiae | 0.1423 | 0.4725 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Firmicutes | 0.0833 | 7.7888 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Chloroflexi | 0.0536 | 0.3574 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Thermi | 0.0431 | 0.0111 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Cyanobacteria | 0.0180 | 0.0009 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Acidobacteria | 0.0140 | 0.0128 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Verrucomicrobia | 0.0075 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Synergistetes | 0.0061 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Gemmatimonadetes | 0.0033 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Chlorobi | 0.0021 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Planctomycetes | 0.0021 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Lentisphaerae | 0.0014 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Chrysiogenetes | 0.0005 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Aquificae | 0.0000 | 0.0042 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Deferribacteres | 0.0000 | 0.0028 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Dictyoglomi | 0.0000 | 0.0008 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Fusobacteria | 0.0000 | 0.2326 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Nitrospirae | 0.0000 | 0.0009 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Spirochaetes | 0.0000 | 0.0257 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Tenericutes | 0.0000 | 0.1460 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Thermotogae | 0.0000 | 0.0101 |
| k__Bacteria;p__WWE1 | 0.0000 | 0.0001 |
Relative abundance of prokaryotic classes associated with grape surfaces of the traditional and accelerated withering process obtained through the MetaPhlAn analyses.
| k__Bacteria;p__Proteobacteria;c__Gammaproteobacteria | 94.0720 | 84.9150 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Proteobacteria;c__Alphaproteobacteria | 1.3884 | 0.1623 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Bacteroidetes;c__Sphingobacteria | 1.2101 | 4.6223 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Proteobacteria;c__Deltaproteobacteria | 1.1684 | 0.4152 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Proteobacteria;c__Betaproteobacteria | 1.0192 | 0.5203 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Actinobacteria;c__Actinobacteria | 0.7383 | 0.0179 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Chlamydiae;c__Chlamydiae | 0.1423 | 0.4725 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Chloroflexi;c__Thermomicrobia | 0.0465 | 0.3569 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia | 0.0359 | 6.48421 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Firmicutes;c__Bacilli | 0.0349 | 1.29394 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Thermi;c__Deinococci | 0.0344 | 0.01114 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Cyanobacteria;c__Cyanophyceae | 0.0157 | 0.0009 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Firmicutes;c__Negativicutes | 0.0126 | 0.0070 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Acidobacteria;c__Acidobacteria | 0.0118 | 0.0128 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Thermi;c__Thermi | 0.0088 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Proteobacteria;c__Epsilonproteobacteria | 0.0076 | 0.0369 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Bacteroidetes;c__Bacteroidia | 0.0061 | 0.0191 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Synergistetes;c__Synergistia | 0.0061 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Verrucomicrobia;c__Opitutae | 0.0043 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Chloroflexi;c__Chloroflexi | 0.0036 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Gemmatimonadetes;c__Gemmatimonadetes | 0.0033 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Verrucomicrobia;c__Spartobacteria | 0.0029 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Proteobacteria;c__Zetaproteobacteria | 0.0028 | 0.0004 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Chloroflexi;c__Anaerolineae | 0.0024 | 0.0005 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Cyanobacteria;c__Gloeobacteria | 0.0023 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Acidobacteria;c__Solibacteres | 0.0022 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Chlorobi;c__Chlorobia | 0.0021 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Planctomycetes;c__Planctomycetacia | 0.0021 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Lentisphaerae;c__Lentisphaerae_uncl | 0.0014 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Chloroflexi;c__Dehalococcoidetes | 0.0011 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Chrysiogenetes;c__Chrysiogenetes | 0.0005 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Verrucomicrobia;c__Verrucomicrobiae | 0.0003 | 0.0000 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Aquificae;c__Aquificae | 0.0000 | 0.0042 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Bacteroidetes;c__Cytophagia | 0.0000 | 0.0002 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Deferribacteres;c__Deferribacteres | 0.0000 | 0.0028 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Dictyoglomi;c__Dictyoglomia | 0.0000 | 0.0008 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Firmicutes;c__Erysipelotrichi | 0.0000 | 0.0037 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Bacteroidetes;c__Flavobacteria | 0.0000 | 0.0956 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Fusobacteria;c__Fusobacteria | 0.0000 | 0.2326 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Tenericutes;c__Mollicutes | 0.0000 | 0.1460 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Nitrospirae;c__Nitrospira | 0.0000 | 0.0009 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Spirochaetes;c__Spirochaetes | 0.0000 | 0.0257 |
| k__Bacteria;p__Thermotogae;c__Thermotogae | 0.0000 | 0.0101 |
| k__Bacteria;p__WWE1;c__WWE1_uncl | 0.0000 | 0.0001 |
Figure 4Taxonomic cladogram reporting all clades present in the traditional (A-TW) and accelerated (B-AW) withered berry samples. Circle size is proportional to the log of the average abundance; colors represent microbial species comprised in the same taxonomic group.
Figure 5Sequence composition-independent binning using metagenome coverage of the traditional (TW) and accelerated (AW) withered berry samples. The nodes represent scaffolds and the color of circles around nodes indicates the phylum. The circle size is proportional to the scaffold bp content. Numbered circles represent potential genome bins.
Assembly information of the 13 extracted genome bins.
| AW | 1 | 112 | 4,456,330 | 30.9 | 105/105 | 100 | 2521.4 | 81.5 | 66.4 | |
| AW | 2 | 103 | 5,268,949 | 29.1 | 105/105 | 100 | 2521.4 | 89.3 | 86.5 | |
| AW | 3 | Lactobacillales sp. UNIVR03 strain | 270 | 3,864,387 | 42.3 | 72/105 | 69 | 645,474.2 | 83.3 | 62.1 |
| AW | 4 | 173 | 4,663,534 | 54.7 | 80/105 | 76 | 137.2 | 99.4 | 98.1 | |
| AW | 5 | 189 | 4,663,534 | 55 | 40/105 | 38 | 1448.1 | 99.2 | 97.2 | |
| TW | 6 | 172 | 4,234,112 | 55.4 | 89/105 | 85 | 8.6 | 93.9 | 87.8 | |
| TW | 7 | 233 | 8,444,622 | 60.6 | 66/105 | 63 | 630.3 | 93.1 | 88.1 | |
| TW | 8 | 177 | 4,540,557 | 59.2 | 68/105 | 65 | 97 | 98.6 | 97.1 | |
| TW | 9 | 224 | 4,145,951 | 59.2 | 14/105 | 13 | 274.4 | 94.1 | 90.05 | |
| TW | 10 | 57 | 5,684,618 | 40.9 | 68/105 | 65 | 5042.8 | 81.7 | 86.5 | |
| TW | 11 | 70 | 6,879,406 | 45.9 | 104/105 | 99 | 5042.8 | 84 | 63.8 | |
| TW | 12 | Actinomycetales sp. UNIVR12 strain | 246 | 3,863,727 | 63.9 | 80/105 | 76 | 4390 | 83.2 | 75.7 |
| TW | 13 | 96 | 3,898,344 | 60.4 | 75/105 | 71 | 207.9 | 92.4 | 89.1 |
The number of the essential genes was estimated using 105 HMM models protein coding essential single copy genes conserved in 95% of all bacteria (Dupont et al., 2012).
Figure ID correspond to the number in Figure 5.
Genome bins completeness and coverage were calculated as described in the Section Materials and Methods.
BlastP and BlastN similarity values based on essential genes.