Literature DB >> 27445151

Gamma and Beta Oscillations Define a Sequence of Neurocognitive Modes Present in Odor Processing.

Donald E Frederick1, Austin Brown2, Elizabeth Brim2, Nisarg Mehta3, Mark Vujovic3, Leslie M Kay4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Olfactory system beta (15-35 Hz) and gamma (40-110 Hz) oscillations of the local field potential in mammals have both been linked to odor learning and discrimination. Gamma oscillations represent the activity of a local network within the olfactory bulb, and beta oscillations represent engagement of a systemwide network. Here, we test whether beta and gamma oscillations represent different cognitive modes using the different demands of go/no-go and two-alternative choice tasks that previously were suggested to favor beta or gamma oscillations, respectively. We reconcile previous studies and show that both beta and gamma oscillations occur in both tasks, with gamma dominating the early odor sampling period (2-4 sniffs) and beta dominating later. The relative power and coherence of both oscillations depend separately on multiple factors within both tasks without categorical differences across tasks. While the early/gamma-associated period occurs in all trials, rats can perform above chance without the later/beta-associated period. Longer sampling, which includes beta oscillations, is associated with better performance. Gamma followed by beta oscillations therefore represents a sequence of cognitive and neural states during odor discrimination, which can be separately modified depending on the demands of a task and odor discrimination. Additionally, fast (85 Hz) and slow (70 Hz) olfactory bulb gamma oscillation sub-bands have been hypothesized to represent tufted and mitral cell networks, respectively (Manabe and Mori, 2013). We find that fast gamma favors the early and slow gamma the later (beta-dominated) odor-sampling period and that the relative contributions of these oscillations are consistent across tasks. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Olfactory system gamma (40-110 Hz) and beta (15-35 Hz) oscillations of the local field potential indicate different neural firing statistics and functional circuits. We show that gamma and beta oscillations occur in stereotyped sequence during odor sampling in associative tasks, with local gamma dominating the first 250 ms of odor sniffing, followed by systemwide beta as behavioral responses are prepared. Oscillations and coupling strength between brain regions are modulated by task, odor, and learning, showing that task features can dramatically adjust the dynamics of a cortical sensory system, which changes state every ∼250 ms. Understanding cortical circuits, even at the biophysical level, depends on careful use of multiple behavioral contexts and stimuli.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/367750-18$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coherence; neural oscillation; olfactory bulb; piriform cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27445151      PMCID: PMC4951578          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0569-16.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  62 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of odor discrimination: neurophysiological and behavioral approaches.

Authors:  Rainer W Friedrich
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Learning-induced oscillatory activities correlated to odour recognition: a network activity.

Authors:  Claire Martin; Rémi Gervais; Belkacem Messaoudi; Nadine Ravel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Olfactory bulb gamma oscillations are enhanced with task demands.

Authors:  Jennifer Beshel; Nancy Kopell; Leslie M Kay
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Chemical factors determine olfactory system beta oscillations in waking rats.

Authors:  Catherine A Lowry; Leslie M Kay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Differential modifications of synaptic weights during odor rule learning: dynamics of interaction between the piriform cortex with lower and higher brain areas.

Authors:  Yaniv Cohen; Donald A Wilson; Edi Barkai
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Lateral entorhinal modulation of piriform cortical activity and fine odor discrimination.

Authors:  Julie Chapuis; Yaniv Cohen; Xiaobin He; Zhijan Zhang; Sen Jin; Fuqiang Xu; Donald A Wilson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  For things needing your attention: the role of neocortical gamma in sensory perception.

Authors:  Dominique L Pritchett; Joshua H Siegle; Christopher A Deister; Christopher I Moore
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Centrifugal regulation of neuronal activity in the olfactory bulb of the waking rabbit as revealed by reversible cryogenic blockade.

Authors:  C M Gray; J E Skinner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  How global are olfactory bulb oscillations?

Authors:  Leslie M Kay; Philip Lazzara
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Chronux: a platform for analyzing neural signals.

Authors:  Hemant Bokil; Peter Andrews; Jayant E Kulkarni; Samar Mehta; Partha P Mitra
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  29 in total

1.  The Physiological Foresight in Freeman's Work: Predictions and Verifications.

Authors:  Leslie M Kay
Journal:  J Conscious Stud       Date:  2018

2.  Pharmacological manipulation of the olfactory bulb modulates beta oscillations: testing model predictions.

Authors:  Bolesław L Osinski; Alex Kim; Wenxi Xiao; Nisarg M Mehta; Leslie M Kay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Nasal Respiration Entrains Human Limbic Oscillations and Modulates Cognitive Function.

Authors:  Christina Zelano; Heidi Jiang; Guangyu Zhou; Nikita Arora; Stephan Schuele; Joshua Rosenow; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Inhibitory circuits of the mammalian main olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Shawn D Burton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Task-Demand-Dependent Neural Representation of Odor Information in the Olfactory Bulb and Posterior Piriform Cortex.

Authors:  Dejuan Wang; Penglai Liu; Xingfeng Mao; Zheng Zhou; Tiantian Cao; Jinshan Xu; Changcheng Sun; Anan Li
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Task-Dependent Behavioral Dynamics Make the Case for Temporal Integration in Multiple Strategies during Odor Processing.

Authors:  Donald E Frederick; Austin Brown; Stephanie Tacopina; Nisarg Mehta; Mark Vujovic; Elizabeth Brim; Tasneem Amina; Bethany Fixsen; Leslie M Kay
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Learning improves decoding of odor identity with phase-referenced oscillations in the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Justin Losacco; Daniel Ramirez-Gordillo; Jesse Gilmer; Diego Restrepo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Theta Oscillations Rapidly Convey Odor-Specific Content in Human Piriform Cortex.

Authors:  Heidi Jiang; Stephan Schuele; Joshua Rosenow; Christina Zelano; Josef Parvizi; James X Tao; Shasha Wu; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  How brains create the world: The dynamical legacy of Walter J Freeman in olfactory system physiology.

Authors:  Leslie M Kay
Journal:  Chaos Complex Lett       Date:  2017

10.  The Value of Homework: Exposure to Odors in the Home Cage Enhances Odor-Discrimination Learning in Mice.

Authors:  Gloria Fleming; Beverly A Wright; Donald A Wilson
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.