Literature DB >> 29847235

Pharmacological manipulation of the olfactory bulb modulates beta oscillations: testing model predictions.

Bolesław L Osinski1,2, Alex Kim3, Wenxi Xiao4, Nisarg M Mehta2, Leslie M Kay2,5.   

Abstract

The mammalian olfactory bulb (OB) generates gamma (40-100 Hz) and beta (15-30 Hz) local field potential (LFP) oscillations. Gamma oscillations arise at the peak of inhalation supported by dendrodendritic interactions between glutamatergic mitral cells (MCs) and GABAergic granule cells (GCs). Beta oscillations are induced by odorants in learning or odor sensitization paradigms, but their mechanism and function are still poorly understood. When centrifugal OB inputs are blocked, beta oscillations disappear, but gamma oscillations persist. Centrifugal inputs target primarily GABAergic interneurons in the GC layer (GCL) and regulate GC excitability, suggesting a causal link between beta oscillations and GC excitability. Our previous modeling work predicted that convergence of excitatory/inhibitory inputs onto MCs and centrifugal inputs onto GCs increase GC excitability sufficiently to produce beta oscillations primarily through voltage dependent calcium channel-mediated GABA release, independently of NMDA channels. We test some of the predictions of this model by examining the influence of NMDA and muscarinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptors, which affect GC excitability in different ways, on beta oscillations. A few minutes after intrabulbar infusion, scopolamine (muscarinic antagonist) suppressed odor-evoked beta in response to a strong stimulus but increased beta power in response to a weak stimulus, as predicted by our model. Pyriform cortex (PC) beta power was unchanged. Oxotremorine (muscarinic agonist) suppressed all oscillations, likely from overinhibition. APV, an NMDA receptor antagonist, suppressed gamma oscillations selectively (in OB and PC), lending support to the model's prediction that beta oscillations can be supported independently of NMDA receptors. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Olfactory bulb local field potential beta oscillations appear to be gated by GABAergic granule cell excitability. Reducing excitability with scopolamine reduces beta induced by strong odors but increases beta induced by weak odors. Beta oscillations rely on the same synapse as gamma oscillations but, unlike gamma, can persist in the absence of NMDA receptor activation. Pyriform cortex beta oscillations maintain power when olfactory bulb beta power is low, and the system maintains beta band coherence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NMDA receptors; acetylcholine; beta oscillations; gamma oscillations; granule cell excitability; muscarinic ACh receptors; olfactory bulb; pyriform cortex

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29847235      PMCID: PMC6171064          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00090.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  53 in total

1.  Activation of heteroliganded mouse muscle nicotinic receptors.

Authors:  Gustav Akk; Lorin S Milescu; Manfred Heckmann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain.

Authors:  Ed S Lein; Michael J Hawrylycz; Nancy Ao; Mikael Ayres; Amy Bensinger; Amy Bernard; Andrew F Boe; Mark S Boguski; Kevin S Brockway; Emi J Byrnes; Lin Chen; Li Chen; Tsuey-Ming Chen; Mei Chi Chin; Jimmy Chong; Brian E Crook; Aneta Czaplinska; Chinh N Dang; Suvro Datta; Nick R Dee; Aimee L Desaki; Tsega Desta; Ellen Diep; Tim A Dolbeare; Matthew J Donelan; Hong-Wei Dong; Jennifer G Dougherty; Ben J Duncan; Amanda J Ebbert; Gregor Eichele; Lili K Estin; Casey Faber; Benjamin A Facer; Rick Fields; Shanna R Fischer; Tim P Fliss; Cliff Frensley; Sabrina N Gates; Katie J Glattfelder; Kevin R Halverson; Matthew R Hart; John G Hohmann; Maureen P Howell; Darren P Jeung; Rebecca A Johnson; Patrick T Karr; Reena Kawal; Jolene M Kidney; Rachel H Knapik; Chihchau L Kuan; James H Lake; Annabel R Laramee; Kirk D Larsen; Christopher Lau; Tracy A Lemon; Agnes J Liang; Ying Liu; Lon T Luong; Jesse Michaels; Judith J Morgan; Rebecca J Morgan; Marty T Mortrud; Nerick F Mosqueda; Lydia L Ng; Randy Ng; Geralyn J Orta; Caroline C Overly; Tu H Pak; Sheana E Parry; Sayan D Pathak; Owen C Pearson; Ralph B Puchalski; Zackery L Riley; Hannah R Rockett; Stephen A Rowland; Joshua J Royall; Marcos J Ruiz; Nadia R Sarno; Katherine Schaffnit; Nadiya V Shapovalova; Taz Sivisay; Clifford R Slaughterbeck; Simon C Smith; Kimberly A Smith; Bryan I Smith; Andy J Sodt; Nick N Stewart; Kenda-Ruth Stumpf; Susan M Sunkin; Madhavi Sutram; Angelene Tam; Carey D Teemer; Christina Thaller; Carol L Thompson; Lee R Varnam; Axel Visel; Ray M Whitlock; Paul E Wohnoutka; Crissa K Wolkey; Victoria Y Wong; Matthew Wood; Murat B Yaylaoglu; Rob C Young; Brian L Youngstrom; Xu Feng Yuan; Bin Zhang; Theresa A Zwingman; Allan R Jones
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Cholinergic modulation in the olfactory bulb influences spontaneous olfactory discrimination in adult rats.

Authors:  Nathalie Mandairon; Casara Jean Ferretti; Conor M Stack; Daniel B Rubin; Thomas A Cleland; Christiane Linster
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Dendritic action potentials connect distributed dendrodendritic microcircuits.

Authors:  M Migliore; Gordon M Shepherd
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Olfactory bulb gamma oscillations are enhanced with task demands.

Authors:  Jennifer Beshel; Nancy Kopell; Leslie M Kay
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Centrifugal drive onto local inhibitory interneurons of the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Aurélie Mouret; Kerren Murray; Pierre-Marie Lledo
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Cholinergic mechanisms in a simple test of olfactory learning in the rat.

Authors:  A J Hunter; T K Murray
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  How global are olfactory bulb oscillations?

Authors:  Leslie M Kay; Philip Lazzara
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Chronux: a platform for analyzing neural signals.

Authors:  Hemant Bokil; Peter Andrews; Jayant E Kulkarni; Samar Mehta; Partha P Mitra
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  In vivo whole-cell recording of odor-evoked synaptic transmission in the rat olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Jianhua Cang; Jeffry S Isaacson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  5 in total

1.  Network Dynamics in the Developing Piriform Cortex of Unanesthetized Rats.

Authors:  Zihao Zhang; Donald Chad Collins; Joost X Maier
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Active Dendrites and Local Field Potentials: Biophysical Mechanisms and Computational Explorations.

Authors:  Manisha Sinha; Rishikesh Narayanan
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Network and synaptic mechanisms underlying high frequency oscillations in the rat and cat olfactory bulb under ketamine-xylazine anesthesia.

Authors:  Władysław Średniawa; Jacek Wróbel; Ewa Kublik; Daniel Krzysztof Wójcik; Miles Adrian Whittington; Mark Jeremy Hunt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Connectivity and dynamics in the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  David E Chen Kersen; Gaia Tavoni; Vijay Balasubramanian
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 5.  COVID-19 and olfactory dysfunction: a looming wave of dementia?

Authors:  Leslie M Kay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 2.974

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.