Literature DB >> 27444141

Provider-Identified Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and Perceptions Toward Self-Collection of Human Papillomavirus in Southwest Virginia.

Christine Garcia1, Heather Lothamer2, Emma McKim Mitchell3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore health care workers identified barriers to cervical cancer screening in rural Southwest Virginia. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: A descriptive study utilizing telephone-based structured interviews and conventional content analysis. All free and federally funded health clinics within a 75 mile radius of Virginia's health Districts 1, 2, and 3 were contacted for participation in the study. MEASURES: Organizational information such as composition of clinical staff, services provided, cost of services, recorded compliance with current guidelines, and assessed individual barriers to accessing screening within the community.
RESULTS: With a 27% response rate, all but one clinic offered cervical cancer screening. The most common barriers to cervical cancer screening identified were lack of education and cost. The most important efforts to detect unscreened women and increase screening would involve clinic-based tracking, education and advertisements. Seventy percent of respondents felt that self-collection of HPV would be at least somewhat acceptable in their communities.
CONCLUSIONS: Public health nursing implications for the barriers of lack of education and high cost were found in this study. In Southwest Virginia, self-collection of HPV was perceived as acceptable by health care workers in the community, and might represent an avenue for increased outreach and education.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  barriers; cervical cancer; rural health nursing; screening; women's health

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27444141     DOI: 10.1111/phn.12285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nurs        ISSN: 0737-1209            Impact factor:   1.462


  5 in total

1.  Gender Differences in the Association between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Cancer.

Authors:  Héctor E Alcalá; A Janet Tomiyama; Ondine S von Ehrenstein
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2017-07-31

2.  Examining Acceptability of Self-Collection for Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Women and Healthcare Providers with a Broader Lens.

Authors:  Virginia Senkomago; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Cervical Cancer Screening in Iranian Women: Healthcare Practitioner Perceptions and Views

Authors:  Mansoureh Refaei; Nahid Dehghan Nayeri; Zohreh Khakbazan; Minoo Pakgohar
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-02-01

4.  Extrinsic and intrinsic factors acting as barriers or facilitators in nurses' implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a mixed-method systematic review.

Authors:  Chiara Gallione; Michela Barisone; Antonella Molon; Moreno Pavani; Cristina Torgano; Erika Bassi; Alberto Dal Molin
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-07-01

5.  Advancing engagement and capacity for rural cancer control: a mixed-methods case study of a Community-Academic Advisory Board in the Appalachia region of Southwest Virginia.

Authors:  Jamie M Zoellner; Kathleen J Porter; Donna-Jean P Brock; Emma Mc Kim Mitchell; Howard Chapman; Deborah Clarkston; Wendy Cohn; Lindsay Hauser; Dianne W Morris; Sarah Y Ramey; Brenna Robinson; Scott Schriefer; Noelle Voges; Kara P Wiseman
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2021-06-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.