Literature DB >> 27443343

Depth of Cochlear Implant Array Within the Cochlea and Performance Outcome.

Ohad Hilly1, Leah Smith2, Euna Hwang2, David Shipp2, Sean Symons3, Julian M Nedzelski2, Joseph M Chen2, Vincent Y W Lin2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the depth of cochlear implant array within the cochlea affects performance outcomes 1 year following cochlear implantation.
METHODS: A retrospective case review of 120 patients who were implanted with the Advanced Bionics HiFocus 1J. Post-implantation plain-radiographs were retrospectively reviewed, and the depth of insertion was measured in degrees from the round window to the electrode tip. Correlation between the depth of insertion and 1-year post-activation Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) scores was analyzed. Intrascala position was not assessed.
RESULTS: Depth of electrode insertion ranged from 180° to 720°, and HINT scores ranged from 0% to 100%. A Mann-Whitney U test demonstrated significantly improved 1-year post-activation HINT scores in patients with an insertion depth of 360° or more in comparison with patients with insertion depth of less than 360° (81% vs 61%, P = .048). Patients with 13 to 15 contacts within cochlear turns performed as well as patients with full insertion of all 16 contacts, while patients with only 12 contacts performed poorly.
CONCLUSIONS: Insertion depth of the AB HiFocus 1J electrode of less than 360° is associated with reduced 1-year post-activation HINT scores when compared with deeper insertions. Partial insertion of 13 active contacts or more led to similar results as full insertion.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implant trials; cochlear implantation; depth of insertion; hearing in noise test; outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27443343     DOI: 10.1177/0003489416660111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  6 in total

1.  CT-scan contouring technique allows for direct and reliable measurements of the cochlear duct length: implication in cochlear implantation with straight electrode-arrays.

Authors:  Thi Hau Vu; Chiara Perazzini; Mathilde Puechmaille; Aurélie Bachy; Aurélien Mulliez; Louis Boyer; Thierry Mom; Jean Gabrillargues
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Hybrid active shape and deep learning method for the accurate and robust segmentation of the intracochlear anatomy in clinical head CT and CBCT images.

Authors:  Yubo Fan; Dongqing Zhang; Rueben Banalagay; Jianing Wang; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-11-24

3.  Effectiveness of skull X-RAY to determine cochlear implant insertion depth.

Authors:  Vinay Fernandes; Yiqiao Wang; Robert Yeung; Sean Symons; Vincent Lin
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-09-03

4.  Angular Electrode Insertion Depth and Speech Perception in Adults With a Cochlear Implant: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Floris Heutink; Simone R de Rijk; Berit M Verbist; Wendy J Huinck; Emmanuel A M Mylanus
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Detection of Extracochlear Electrodes in Cochlear Implants with Electric Field Imaging/Transimpedance Measurements: A Human Cadaver Study.

Authors:  Simone R de Rijk; Yu C Tam; Robert P Carlyon; Manohar L Bance
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  Effect of Electrode Insertion Angle on Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Adult and Children Patients with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Ting Fan; Meng-Ya Xiang; Yang Li; Jia-Min Gong; Tao Wu; Yue Wang; Jin Xu; Yun-Feng Wang; Jian Li
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 7.310

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.