Luuk Rietbergen1, Jesse W P Kuiper1, Simon Walgrave2, Laura Hak1,3, Sascha Colen2,4. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre for Orthopaedic Research Alkmaar (CORAL), Alkmaar - The Netherlands. 2. University Hospitals Leuven, Pellenberg site, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pellenberg - Belgium. 3. Research Institute MOVE, Department of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam - The Netherlands. 4. Helios Klinikum Duisburg, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Duisburg - Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this review was to assess (health-related) quality of life ([HR]Qol) after 1-stage or 2-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection of the hip (PJI). Additionally, we compared (HR)QoL scores with normative population scores to assess whether QoL is reduced after revision for PJI. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in Embase, Cochrane and Pubmed. We included articles that reported (HR)QoL questionnaires after staged revision for hip PJI with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Methodological quality was assessed using the MINORS score. RESULTS: The search produced 11,195 results. We selected 12 papers describing 2-stage revisions. The mean MINORS score was 9.8. Average WOMAC scores of 185 patients with a mean follow-up of 69.8 months were 73.Average Short Form 36 (SF-36) scores of 159 patients with a mean follow-up of 40.7 months were 40.4 for the physical component score (PCS) and 51.6 for the mental component score (MCS). Average Short Form 12 (SF-12) scores of 154 patients with a mean follow-up of 73.4 months were: a PCS of 35.4 and a MCS of 49.1. The WOMAC, SF-12 (PCS) and SF-36 (PCS) were respectively 12%, 26.7% and 14.8% lower, compared to normative values. DISCUSSIONS: Patients who underwent 2-stage revision for hip PJI had substantially lower (physical component) (HR)QoL scores, but mental scores were comparable to the general population.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this review was to assess (health-related) quality of life ([HR]Qol) after 1-stage or 2-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection of the hip (PJI). Additionally, we compared (HR)QoL scores with normative population scores to assess whether QoL is reduced after revision for PJI. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in Embase, Cochrane and Pubmed. We included articles that reported (HR)QoL questionnaires after staged revision for hip PJI with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Methodological quality was assessed using the MINORS score. RESULTS: The search produced 11,195 results. We selected 12 papers describing 2-stage revisions. The mean MINORS score was 9.8. Average WOMAC scores of 185 patients with a mean follow-up of 69.8 months were 73.Average Short Form 36 (SF-36) scores of 159 patients with a mean follow-up of 40.7 months were 40.4 for the physical component score (PCS) and 51.6 for the mental component score (MCS). Average Short Form 12 (SF-12) scores of 154 patients with a mean follow-up of 73.4 months were: a PCS of 35.4 and a MCS of 49.1. The WOMAC, SF-12 (PCS) and SF-36 (PCS) were respectively 12%, 26.7% and 14.8% lower, compared to normative values. DISCUSSIONS: Patients who underwent 2-stage revision for hip PJI had substantially lower (physical component) (HR)QoL scores, but mental scores were comparable to the general population.
Authors: Jun Tan; Yang Liu; Sabrina Ehnert; Andreas K Nüssler; Yang Yu; Jianzhong Xu; Tao Chen Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 6.073
Authors: J Quayle; A Barakat; A Klasan; A Mittal; G Chan; J Gibbs; M Edmondson; P Stott Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2021-04-16 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Paul Ruckenstuhl; Georgi I Wassilew; Michael Müller; Christian Hipfl; Matthias Pumberger; Carsten Perka; Sebastian Hardt Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Jesse W P Kuiper; Christine M E Rustenburg; Jore H Willems; Steven J Verberne; Edgar J G Peters; Rachid Saouti Journal: J Bone Jt Infect Date: 2018-07-06