Literature DB >> 27442908

The Role of Education in the Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Emergency Medicine: A Research Agenda.

Esther H Chen1, Hemal K Kanzaria1, Kaoru Itakura2, Juanita Booker-Vaughns3, Kabir Yadav2, Bryan G Kane4.   

Abstract

Shared decision making (SDM) is a patient-centered communication skill that is essential for all physicians to provide quality care. Like any competency or procedural skill, it can and should be introduced to medical students during their clerkships (undergraduate medical education), taught and assessed during residency training (graduate medical education), and have documentation of maintenance throughout an emergency physician's career (denoted as continuing medical education). A subgroup representing academic emergency medicine (EM) faculty, residents, content experts, and patients convened at the 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on SDM to develop a research agenda toward improving implementation of SDM through sustainable education efforts. After developing a list of potential priorities, the subgroup presented the priorities in turn to the consensus group, to the EM program directors (CORD-EM), and finally at the conference itself. The two highest-priority questions were related to determining or developing EM-applicable available tools and on-shift interventions for SDM and working to determine the proportion of the broader SDM curriculum that should be taught and assessed at each level of training. Educating patients and the community about SDM was also raised as an important concept for consideration. The remaining research priorities were divided into high-, moderate-, and lower-priority groups. Moreover, there was consensus that the overall approach to SDM should be consistent with the high-quality educational design utilized for other pertinent topics in EM.
© 2016 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27442908     DOI: 10.1111/acem.13059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  6 in total

1.  The Effect of Shared Decisionmaking on Patients' Likelihood of Filing a Complaint or Lawsuit: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Shelby Mader; Connor Houghton; Robert Wenger; Marc A Probst; David A Schoenfeld; Peter K Lindenauer; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  A Qualitative Analysis of Attending Physicians' Use of Shared Decision-Making: Implications for Resident Education.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Sarah L Goff; Tala R Elia; Errel R Khordipour; Kye E Poronsky; Kelly A Nault; Peter K Lindenauer; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-02

Review 3.  Addressing overuse in emergency medicine: evidence of a role for greater patient engagement.

Authors:  Erika H Newton
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2017-12-30

4.  Impact of panelists' experience on script concordance test scores of medical students.

Authors:  Olivier Peyrony; Alice Hutin; Jennifer Truchot; Raphaël Borie; David Calvet; Adrien Albaladejo; Yousrah Baadj; Pierre-Emmanuel Cailleaux; Martin Flamant; Clémence Martin; Jonathan Messika; Alexandre Meunier; Mariana Mirabel; Victoria Tea; Xavier Treton; Sylvie Chevret; David Lebeaux; Damien Roux
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Applying Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Physicians' Shared Decision-Making With Patients With Acute Respiratory Infections in Primary Care: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Dan Wang; Xinping Zhang; Haihong Chen; Chenxi Liu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Shared Decision Making for the Emergency Provider: Engaging Patients When Seconds Count.

Authors:  Hemal K Kanzaria; Esther H Chen
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2020-08-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.