Literature DB >> 27440804

ACL Fibers Near the Lateral Intercondylar Ridge Are the Most Load Bearing During Stability Examinations and Isometric Through Passive Flexion.

Danyal H Nawabi1, Scott Tucker2, Kevin A Schafer2, Hendrik Aernout Zuiderbaan3, Joseph T Nguyen, Thomas L Wickiewicz3, Carl W Imhauser2, Andrew D Pearle3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The femoral insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has direct and indirect fiber types located within the respective high (anterior) and low (posterior) regions of the femoral footprint. HYPOTHESIS: The fibers in the high region of the ACL footprint carry more force and are more isometric than the fibers in the low region of the ACL footprint. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were mounted to a robotic manipulator. A 134-N anterior force at 30° and 90° of flexion and combined valgus (8 N·m) and internal (4 N·m) rotation torques at 15° of flexion were applied simulating tests of anterior and rotatory stability. The ACL was sectioned at the femoral footprint by detaching either the higher band of fibers neighboring the lateral intercondylar ridge in the region of the direct insertion or the posterior, crescent-shaped fibers in the region of the indirect insertion, followed by the remainder of the ACL. The kinematics of the ACL-intact knee was replayed, and the reduction in force due to each sectioned portion of insertion fibers was measured. Isometry was assessed at anteromedial, center, and posterolateral locations within the high and low regions of the femoral footprint.
RESULTS: With an anterior tibial force at 30° of flexion, the high fibers carried 83.9% of the total anterior ACL load compared with 16.1% in the low fibers (P < .001). The high fibers also carried more anterior force than the low fibers at 90° of flexion (95.2% vs 4.8%; P < .001). Under combined torques at 15° of flexion, the high fibers carried 84.2% of the anterior ACL force compared with 15.8% in the low fibers (P < .001). Virtual ACL fibers placed at the anteromedial portion of the high region of the femoral footprint were the most isometric, with a maximum length change of 3.9 ± 1.5 mm.
CONCLUSION: ACL fibers located high within the femoral footprint bear more force during stability testing and are more isometric during flexion than low fibers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: It may be advantageous to create a "higher" femoral tunnel during ACL reconstruction at the lateral intercondylar ridge.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Keywords:  ACL; direct insertion; femoral footprint; force; indirect insertion; isometry; lateral intercondylar ridge

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27440804     DOI: 10.1177/0363546516652876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  15 in total

1.  An In Vivo Prediction of Anisometry and Strain in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - A Combined Magnetic Resonance and Dual Fluoroscopic Imaging Analysis.

Authors:  Willem A Kernkamp; Nathan H Varady; Jing-Sheng Li; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Peter D Asnis; Ewoud R A van Arkel; Rob G H H Nelissen; Thomas J Gill; Samuel K Van de Velde; Guoan Li
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Transportal central femoral tunnel placement has a significantly higher revision rate than transtibial AM femoral tunnel placement in hamstring ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark Clatworthy; Steffen Sauer; Tim Roberts
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Combination of anterior tibial and femoral tunnels makes the signal intensity of antero-medial graft higher in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Daisuke Chiba; Yuji Yamamoto; Yuka Kimura; Shizuka Sasaki; Eiichi Tsuda; Yasuyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Arthroscopic primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: what the radiologist needs to know.

Authors:  Steven P Daniels; Jelle P van der List; J Jacob Kazam; Gregory S DiFelice
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  No differences in clinical outcomes and graft healing between anteromedial and central femoral tunnel placement after single bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Jiahao Zhang; Yong Ma; Chaonan Pang; Haijun Wang; Yanfang Jiang; Yingfang Ao
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Creating a Femoral Tunnel Aperture at the Anteromedial Footprint Versus the Central Footprint in ACL Reconstruction: Comparison of Contact Stress Patterns.

Authors:  Sung-Jae Kim; Si Young Song; Tae Soung Kim; Yoon Sang Kim; Seong-Wook Jang; Young-Jin Seo
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-29

7.  Transtibial Versus Anteromedial Portal ACL Reconstruction: Is a Hybrid Approach the Best?

Authors:  Jonathan K Jennings; Daniel P Leas; James E Fleischli; Donald F D'Alessandro; Richard D Peindl; Dana P Piasecki
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-08-07

Review 8.  Independent Versus Transtibial Drilling in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis With Meta-regression.

Authors:  Marco Cuzzolin; Davide Previtali; Marco Delcogliano; Giuseppe Filardo; Christian Candrian; Alberto Grassi
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-07-12

9.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury, Reconstruction, and the Optimization of Outcome.

Authors:  James Philip Bliss
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Positioning of the femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: functional anatomical reconstruction.

Authors:  Pedro Baches Jorge; Diego Escudeiro; Nilson Roberto Severino; Cláudio Santili; Ricardo de Paula Leite Cury; Aires Duarte Junior; Luiz Gabriel Betoni Guglielmetti
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2018-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.