Literature DB >> 2743986

Reference values for trabecular and cortical vertebral bone density in single and dual-energy quantitative computed tomography.

W A Kalender1, D Felsenberg, O Louis, P Lopez, E Klotz, M Osteaux, J Fraga.   

Abstract

The validity of reference values for vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) reported in the literature has frequently been questioned. The introduction of dual-energy methods, new calibration systems, and automated image evaluation algorithms, has also made it necessary for us to re-evaluate BMD values in a normal population. We present patient selection criteria, CT measurement and evaluation protocols and results of single energy (SEQCT) and dual energy quantitative CT (DEQCT) for trabecular (tBMD) and cortical (cBMD) bone density in 135 males and 139 females. For SEQCT, tBMD loss rates of 1.7 and 1.8 mg/ml per year for males and females, respectively, were determined by linear regression. The respective DEQCT data show smaller decrements with age. Different statistical models for tBMD in females were tested; models based on a multiphase variation of tBMD yielded an improvement of the fit. For cBMD the percent rate of loss with age is much smaller than for tBMD; females showed a significantly higher loss rate than males, however. A comparison of our results with published data is included.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2743986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  40 in total

1.  Bone quality.

Authors:  Ego Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Compact and trabecular components of the spine using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  T Sandor; D Felsenberg; W A Kalender; A Clain; E Brown
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Fracture risk: a role for compact bone.

Authors:  R B Mazess
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Effect of aging on trabecular and compact bone components of proximal and ultradistal radius.

Authors:  D Gatti; M Rossini; N Zamberlan; V Braga; E Fracassi; S Adami
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Bone status in elite male runners.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kemmler; Klaus Engelke; Heiko Baumann; Carola Beeskow; Simon von Stengel; Jürgen Weineck; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Bone imaging: traditional techniques and their interpretation.

Authors:  Holger F Boehm; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Hot stuff--can't get enough.

Authors:  E Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Bone loss in men.

Authors:  C Gennari; R Nuti
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Quantitative computed tomography for measuring bone mineral density in athletes.

Authors:  H Dinç; G Savci; A Demirci; M Y Sadikoğlu; E Tuncel; H Yavuz
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 10.  Nandrolone decanoate: pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in osteoporosis.

Authors:  P Geusens
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.