Literature DB >> 27437573

Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in superconducting circuits.

Nissim Ofek, Andrei Petrenko, Reinier Heeres, Philip Reinhold, Zaki Leghtas, Brian Vlastakis, Yehan Liu, Luigi Frunzio, S M Girvin, L Jiang, Mazyar Mirrahimi, M H Devoret, R J Schoelkopf.   

Abstract

Quantum error correction (QEC) can overcome the errors experienced by qubits and is therefore an essential component of a future quantum computer. To implement QEC, a qubit is redundantly encoded in a higher-dimensional space using quantum states with carefully tailored symmetry properties. Projective measurements of these parity-type observables provide error syndrome information, with which errors can be corrected via simple operations. The 'break-even' point of QEC--at which the lifetime of a qubit exceeds the lifetime of the constituents of the system--has so far remained out of reach. Although previous works have demonstrated elements of QEC, they primarily illustrate the signatures or scaling properties of QEC codes rather than test the capacity of the system to preserve a qubit over time. Here we demonstrate a QEC system that reaches the break-even point by suppressing the natural errors due to energy loss for a qubit logically encoded in superpositions of Schrödinger-cat states of a superconducting resonator. We implement a full QEC protocol by using real-time feedback to encode, monitor naturally occurring errors, decode and correct. As measured by full process tomography, without any post-selection, the corrected qubit lifetime is 320 microseconds, which is longer than the lifetime of any of the parts of the system: 20 times longer than the lifetime of the transmon, about 2.2 times longer than the lifetime of an uncorrected logical encoding and about 1.1 longer than the lifetime of the best physical qubit (the |0〉f and |1〉f Fock states of the resonator). Our results illustrate the benefit of using hardware-efficient qubit encodings rather than traditional QEC schemes. Furthermore, they advance the field of experimental error correction from confirming basic concepts to exploring the metrics that drive system performance and the challenges in realizing a fault-tolerant system.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27437573     DOI: 10.1038/nature18949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  22 in total

1.  Error Correcting Codes in Quantum Theory.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1996-07-29       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Hardware-efficient autonomous quantum memory protection.

Authors:  Zaki Leghtas; Gerhard Kirchmair; Brian Vlastakis; Robert J Schoelkopf; Michel H Devoret; Mazyar Mirrahimi
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Deterministically encoding quantum information using 100-photon Schrödinger cat states.

Authors:  Brian Vlastakis; Gerhard Kirchmair; Zaki Leghtas; Simon E Nigg; Luigi Frunzio; S M Girvin; Mazyar Mirrahimi; M H Devoret; R J Schoelkopf
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Observation of quantum jumps in a superconducting artificial atom.

Authors:  R Vijay; D H Slichter; I Siddiqi
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Experimental repetitive quantum error correction.

Authors:  Philipp Schindler; Julio T Barreiro; Thomas Monz; Volckmar Nebendahl; Daniel Nigg; Michael Chwalla; Markus Hennrich; Rainer Blatt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Quantum engineering. Confining the state of light to a quantum manifold by engineered two-photon loss.

Authors:  Z Leghtas; S Touzard; I M Pop; A Kou; B Vlastakis; A Petrenko; K M Sliwa; A Narla; S Shankar; M J Hatridge; M Reagor; L Frunzio; R J Schoelkopf; M Mirrahimi; M H Devoret
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Superconducting circuits for quantum information: an outlook.

Authors:  M H Devoret; R J Schoelkopf
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Universal control and error correction in multi-qubit spin registers in diamond.

Authors:  T H Taminiau; J Cramer; T van der Sar; V V Dobrovitski; R Hanson
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 39.213

9.  Demonstration of a quantum error detection code using a square lattice of four superconducting qubits.

Authors:  A D Córcoles; Easwar Magesan; Srikanth J Srinivasan; Andrew W Cross; M Steffen; Jay M Gambetta; Jerry M Chow
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Repeated quantum error correction on a continuously encoded qubit by real-time feedback.

Authors:  J Cramer; N Kalb; M A Rol; B Hensen; M S Blok; M Markham; D J Twitchen; R Hanson; T H Taminiau
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  37 in total

1.  Promising ways to encode and manipulate quantum information.

Authors:  Alessandro Ferraro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Experimental comparison of two quantum computing architectures.

Authors:  Norbert M Linke; Dmitri Maslov; Martin Roetteler; Shantanu Debnath; Caroline Figgatt; Kevin A Landsman; Kenneth Wright; Christopher Monroe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Protecting a bosonic qubit with autonomous quantum error correction.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Gertler; Brian Baker; Juliang Li; Shruti Shirol; Jens Koch; Chen Wang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three surface code.

Authors:  Sebastian Krinner; Nathan Lacroix; Ants Remm; Agustin Di Paolo; Elie Genois; Catherine Leroux; Christoph Hellings; Stefania Lazar; Francois Swiadek; Johannes Herrmann; Graham J Norris; Christian Kraglund Andersen; Markus Müller; Alexandre Blais; Christopher Eichler; Andreas Wallraff
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Experimental exploration of five-qubit quantum error-correcting code with superconducting qubits.

Authors:  Ming Gong; Xiao Yuan; Shiyu Wang; Yulin Wu; Youwei Zhao; Chen Zha; Shaowei Li; Zhen Zhang; Qi Zhao; Yunchao Liu; Futian Liang; Jin Lin; Yu Xu; Hui Deng; Hao Rong; He Lu; Simon C Benjamin; Cheng-Zhi Peng; Xiongfeng Ma; Yu-Ao Chen; Xiaobo Zhu; Jian-Wei Pan
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 17.275

6.  Quantum-enhanced radiometry via approximate quantum error correction.

Authors:  W Wang; Z-J Chen; X Liu; W Cai; Y Ma; X Mu; X Pan; Z Hua; L Hu; Y Xu; H Wang; Y P Song; X-B Zou; C-L Zou; L Sun
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  High coherence plane breaking packaging for superconducting qubits.

Authors:  Nicholas T Bronn; Vivekananda P Adiga; Salvatore B Olivadese; Xian Wu; Jerry M Chow; David P Pappas
Journal:  Quantum Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-07

8.  Silicon qubits move a step closer to achieving error correction.

Authors:  Ada Warren; Sophia E Economou
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Control and readout of a superconducting qubit using a photonic link.

Authors:  F Lecocq; F Quinlan; K Cicak; J Aumentado; S A Diddams; J D Teufel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 69.504

10.  Experimental demonstration of continuous quantum error correction.

Authors:  William P Livingston; Machiel S Blok; Emmanuel Flurin; Justin Dressel; Andrew N Jordan; Irfan Siddiqi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 17.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.