Literature DB >> 35070323

Experimental exploration of five-qubit quantum error-correcting code with superconducting qubits.

Ming Gong1, Xiao Yuan1, Shiyu Wang1, Yulin Wu1, Youwei Zhao1, Chen Zha1, Shaowei Li1, Zhen Zhang2, Qi Zhao2, Yunchao Liu2, Futian Liang1, Jin Lin1, Yu Xu1, Hui Deng1, Hao Rong1, He Lu1, Simon C Benjamin3, Cheng-Zhi Peng1, Xiongfeng Ma2, Yu-Ao Chen1, Xiaobo Zhu1, Jian-Wei Pan1.   

Abstract

Quantum error correction is an essential ingredient for universal quantum computing. Despite tremendous experimental efforts in the study of quantum error correction, to date, there has been no demonstration in the realisation of universal quantum error-correcting code, with the subsequent verification of all key features including the identification of an arbitrary physical error, the capability for transversal manipulation of the logical state and state decoding. To address this challenge, we experimentally realise the [5, 1, 3] code, the so-called smallest perfect code that permits corrections of generic single-qubit errors. In the experiment, having optimised the encoding circuit, we employ an array of superconducting qubits to realise the [5, 1, 3] code for several typical logical states including the magic state, an indispensable resource for realising non-Clifford gates. The encoded states are prepared with an average fidelity of [Formula: see text] while with a high fidelity of [Formula: see text] in the code space. Then, the arbitrary single-qubit errors introduced manually are identified by measuring the stabilisers. We further implement logical Pauli operations with a fidelity of [Formula: see text] within the code space. Finally, we realise the decoding circuit and recover the input state with an overall fidelity of [Formula: see text], in total with 92 gates. Our work demonstrates each key aspect of the [5, 1, 3] code and verifies the viability of experimental realisation of quantum error-correcting codes with superconducting qubits.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of China Science Publishing & Media Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  error detection; five-qubit code; logical operation; quantum error-correcting code; superconducting qubit

Year:  2021        PMID: 35070323      PMCID: PMC8776549          DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwab011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Natl Sci Rev        ISSN: 2053-714X            Impact factor:   17.275


  24 in total

1.  Perfect Quantum Error Correcting Code.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Universal Quantum Simulators

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-08-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev A       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.140

4.  State preservation by repetitive error detection in a superconducting quantum circuit.

Authors:  J Kelly; R Barends; A G Fowler; A Megrant; E Jeffrey; T C White; D Sank; J Y Mutus; B Campbell; Yu Chen; Z Chen; B Chiaro; A Dunsworth; I-C Hoi; C Neill; P J J O'Malley; C Quintana; P Roushan; A Vainsencher; J Wenner; A N Cleland; John M Martinis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Genuine 12-Qubit Entanglement on a Superconducting Quantum Processor.

Authors:  Ming Gong; Ming-Cheng Chen; Yarui Zheng; Shiyu Wang; Chen Zha; Hui Deng; Zhiguang Yan; Hao Rong; Yulin Wu; Shaowei Li; Fusheng Chen; Youwei Zhao; Futian Liang; Jin Lin; Yu Xu; Cheng Guo; Lihua Sun; Anthony D Castellano; Haohua Wang; Chengzhi Peng; Chao-Yang Lu; Xiaobo Zhu; Jian-Wei Pan
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Experimental demonstration of a graph state quantum error-correction code.

Authors:  B A Bell; D A Herrera-Martí; M S Tame; D Markham; W J Wadsworth; J G Rarity
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Quantum error correction of a qubit encoded in grid states of an oscillator.

Authors:  P Campagne-Ibarcq; A Eickbusch; S Touzard; E Zalys-Geller; N E Frattini; V V Sivak; P Reinhold; S Puri; S Shankar; R J Schoelkopf; L Frunzio; M Mirrahimi; M H Devoret
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Detecting bit-flip errors in a logical qubit using stabilizer measurements.

Authors:  D Ristè; S Poletto; M-Z Huang; A Bruno; V Vesterinen; O-P Saira; L DiCarlo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Decoding quantum errors with subspace expansions.

Authors:  Jarrod R McClean; Zhang Jiang; Nicholas C Rubin; Ryan Babbush; Hartmut Neven
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Protecting quantum entanglement from leakage and qubit errors via repetitive parity measurements.

Authors:  C C Bultink; T E O'Brien; R Vollmer; N Muthusubramanian; M W Beekman; M A Rol; X Fu; B Tarasinski; V Ostroukh; B Varbanov; A Bruno; L DiCarlo
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  2 in total

1.  Fault-tolerant operation of a logical qubit in a diamond quantum processor.

Authors:  M H Abobeih; Y Wang; J Randall; S J H Loenen; C E Bradley; M Markham; D J Twitchen; B M Terhal; T H Taminiau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 69.504

2.  Optical demonstration of quantum fault-tolerant threshold.

Authors:  Kai Sun; Ze-Yan Hao; Yan Wang; Jia-Kun Li; Xiao-Ye Xu; Jin-Shi Xu; Yong-Jian Han; Chuan-Feng Li; Guang-Can Guo
Journal:  Light Sci Appl       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 20.257

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.