| Literature DB >> 27437025 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dewlaps are iconic features of several ungulate species and, although a role in signalling has been postulated, their function remains largely unexplored. We recently failed to find any age-independent link between dewlap size and social status in the common eland (Tragelaphus oryx), pointing to the possibility that sexual selection may not be the primary cause of dewlap evolution in ungulates. Here I use a two-pronged approach to test hypotheses on the function of ungulate dewlaps: an interspecific comparative analysis of bovids and deer, and an intraspecific study of eland antelopes in the wild.Entities:
Keywords: Bovidae; Cervidae; Claw-marks; Female Mate Choice; Male competition; Mammalia; Natural selection; Ornaments; Signal evolution
Year: 2016 PMID: 27437025 PMCID: PMC4949748 DOI: 10.1186/s12983-016-0165-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Zool ISSN: 1742-9994 Impact factor: 3.172
Fig. 1Broadside display between two eland bulls
Fig. 2a A young male eland with claw-marks on his flank still bleeding. b An older male with claw-mark scars on his flank and hindquarters. c Claw-mark scars on the rump of a male estimated at 3 years old (2007). d The same scar as in c six years later (2013)
Predictors of the presence of dewlaps in males within the Bovidae and Cervidae (binary PGLMM: N = 133 species; phylogenetic signal: male body mass [log10]: s2 = 3.19, P < 0.001)
| Bivariate analyses | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient (±SEM) |
|
| Coefficient (±SEM) |
|
| |
| Male body mass (log10) | 3.59 ± 1.55 | 2.32 | 0.021 | 3.59 ± 1.55 | 2.32 | 0.021 |
| Sexual body-size dimorphism (log10) | 0.984 ± 2.538 | 0.39 | 0.698 | -620 ± 6.32 | -0.98 | 0.326 |
Fig. 3a Dewlap droop in males with and without claw-marks according to age. b Prevalence of claw-marks in relation to age. Columns and error bars indicate the mean and its standard error; numbers above columns refer to sample sizes
Predictive framework and results
| Predictions | Support? | Source |
|---|---|---|
| H1: Sexual selection hypothesis | ||
| P1: SSD predicts the presence of dewlaps (interspecific) | No | This study |
| P2: Dewlap size predicts dominance status (intraspecific) | ‘Yes’, but not after control for age | Bro-Jørgensen & Beeston (2015) |
| P3: Dewlap size predicts master bull status (intraspecific) | No | Bro-Jørgensen & Beeston (2015) |
| H2: Predator deterrence hypothesis | ||
| P1: Large dewlap size predicts the absence of claw-marks (intraspecific) | No, the opposite | This study |
| P2: If condition-dependent handicap, scars from predation attempts present on dewlaps (intraspecific) | No | This study |
| H3: Thermoregulation hypothesis | ||
| P1: Large body size predicts the presence of dewlaps (interspecific) | Yes (threshold approx. 400 kg) | This study |