Literature DB >> 29912338

Relationship of weight gain with infrared temperatures in Nelore and F1 (Nelore × Angus) heifers reared in two forage production systems1.

Tiago P Paim1, Rodrigo de Oliveira Goulart1, Diego A L da Silva1, Janayna de Almeida Sousa1, Lucas F Gonçalves1, Flavio L Claudio1, Guido Calgaro Júnior1, Alexandra A Gléria1, Leonardo C Santos2, Estenio M Alves1.   

Abstract

Intensive production systems require high-yield genetics as obtained in Bos taurus × Bos indicus crossbreeding. Generally, high-producing taurine cattle are more susceptible to parasites and heat stress. This study evaluated animal performance, heat-stress measurement (infrared temperatures), and internal parasite infection with daily weight gain in heifers from 2 genetic groups (Nelore and F1-Nelore × Angus) reared in 2 forage production systems (with or without crop-livestock system) during 1 yr. The main objectives were to determine the relationship between infrared measures and animal performance and whether it differs between genetic groups and environments. Thirty-six heifers were randomly assigned to 2 forage production systems, one considered as high-input system with crop-livestock system and other exclusive livestock system considered as low input. At each 28 d, infrared thermography (IR) temperatures, weight, and internal parasite infection (fecal egg count) were measured. The temperatures of the eye, snout, forehead, dewlap, body, ground and squeeze chute were determined. F1 heifers had higher weight gain than Nelore (P < 0.05) and both did not differ in internal parasite infection (P > 0.05). F1 heifers had higher IR than Nelore (P < 0.05). The main body points that differentiate between genetic groups were dewlap, forehead, and eye. Higher dewlap IR temperature (DW) was associated with higher average daily gain (ADG) during dry season (independently of genetic groups) (ADG = -0.755 + 0.032 × DW; R2 = 0.44). Otherwise, the IR temperatures had a negative relationship with ADG during rainy season and low forehead IR temperature was related to higher average daily gain (ADG = 1.81 - 0.033 × forehead; R2 = 0.12 for F1 animals and ADG = 1.46 - 0.025 × forehead; R2 = 0.07 for Nelore). The infrared temperatures were more related to animal performance during the dry season, which had high temperature and low humidity. The infrared temperatures were able to identify the animal response to the environment challenge. Animals with higher temperatures (dewlap and forehead) had higher daily gain during the dry season.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bovine; crop-livestock; crossbreeding; gastrointestinal parasite; season; tropical

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29912338      PMCID: PMC6127773          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  16 in total

1.  Assessing feed efficiency in beef steers through feeding behavior, infrared thermography and glucocorticoids.

Authors:  Y R Montanholi; K C Swanson; R Palme; F S Schenkel; B W McBride; D Lu; S P Miller
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Eye temperature and heart rate variability of calves disbudded with or without local anaesthetic.

Authors:  M Stewart; K J Stafford; S K Dowling; A L Schaefer; J R Webster
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-12-04

Review 3.  Challenges of nematode control in ruminants: focus on Latin America.

Authors:  Marcelo Beltrão Molento; Fernanda Silva Fortes; Deborah Araujo Santos Pondelek; Fernando de Almeida Borges; Ana Carolina de Souza Chagas; Juan Felipe de J Torres-Acosta; Peter Geldhof
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.738

4.  Infrared thermography as a tool to evaluate body surface temperature and its relationship with feed efficiency in Bos indicus cattle in tropical conditions.

Authors:  Luciane Silva Martello; Saulo da Luz E Silva; Rodrigo da Costa Gomes; Rosana Ruegger Pereira da Silva Corte; Paulo Roberto Leme
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 5.  Environmental factors influencing transmission.

Authors:  B E Stromberg
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.738

6.  Resistance of beef cattle of two genetic groups to ectoparasites and gastrointestinal nematodes in the state of São Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  M C S Oliveira; M M Alencar; R Giglioti; M C D Beraldo; F F Aníbal; R O Correia; L Boschini; A C S Chagas; T B Bilhassi; H N Oliveira
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 2.738

7.  Monitoring the body temperature of cows and calves using video recordings from an infrared thermography camera.

Authors:  Gundula Hoffmann; Mariana Schmidt; Christian Ammon; Sandra Rose-Meierhöfer; Onno Burfeind; Wolfgang Heuwieser; Werner Berg
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.459

8.  Infrared Thermography to Evaluate Heat Tolerance in Different Genetic Groups of Lambs.

Authors:  Concepta McManus; Eliandra Bianchini; Tiago do Prado Paim; Flavia Gontijo de Lima; José Braccini Neto; Marlos Castanheira; Geisa Isilda Ferreira Esteves; Caio Cesar Cardoso; Vanessa Calderaro Dalcin
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Automated measurement of cattle surface temperature and its correlation with rectal temperature.

Authors:  HongXiang Kou; YiQiang Zhao; Kang Ren; XiaoLi Chen; YongQiang Lu; Dong Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Heat Tolerance in Curraleiro Pe-Duro, Pantaneiro and Nelore Cattle Using Thermographic Images.

Authors:  Caio Cesar Cardoso; Flávia Gontijo Lima; Maria Clorinda Soares Fioravanti; Andrea Alves do Egito; Flávia Cristina de Paula E Silva; Candice Bergmann Tanure; Vanessa Peripolli; Concepta McManus
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.